Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hmm 850 billion divided by 297,000 jobs..... yeah that Obama he dun gut
40% of which were tax cuts.
So..not sure what you are saying. Tax cuts work? Or they don't?
Obamanomics don't work.
Businesses started hiring as soon as the Progressive Jihad on Free Enterprise was halted by the November 2010 Tsunami
40% of which were tax cuts.
So..not sure what you are saying. Tax cuts work? Or they don't?
Obamanomics don't work.
Businesses started hiring as soon as the Progressive Jihad on Free Enterprise was halted by the November 2010 Tsunami
but i thought it was already determined on here that policy doesnt affect job creation? is the right back tracking on that statement now?
and seeing as how none of the newly elected were in power yet, nor was there a tax compromise on the books, the credit for the 297,000 jobs created goes solely to Obama and the democratic congress.
Obamanomics don't work.
Businesses started hiring as soon as the Progressive Jihad on Free Enterprise was halted by the November 2010 Tsunami
but i thought it was already determined on here that policy doesnt affect job creation? is the right back tracking on that statement now?
and seeing as how none of the newly elected were in power yet, nor was there a tax compromise on the books, the credit for the 297,000 jobs created goes solely to Obama and the democratic congress.
The economy started to tank the day Nancy picked up the gavel and its looks like recovery started as soon as she handed it back
if that is the case, then no policy he pushed had anything to do with itbut i thought it was already determined on here that policy doesnt affect job creation? is the right back tracking on that statement now?
and seeing as how none of the newly elected were in power yet, nor was there a tax compromise on the books, the credit for the 297,000 jobs created goes solely to Obama and the democratic congress.
The economy started to tank the day Nancy picked up the gavel and its looks like recovery started as soon as she handed it back
the recovery actually started soon after Obama took office.
in 2008 the GDP was at 0.6% when Bush left office
in Dec 2010 the GDP was 2.6%.
A full time job without a specified end date, as opposed to a temp job which is for a limited term.
but i thought it was already determined on here that policy doesnt affect job creation? is the right back tracking on that statement now?
and seeing as how none of the newly elected were in power yet, nor was there a tax compromise on the books, the credit for the 297,000 jobs created goes solely to Obama and the democratic congress.
The economy started to tank the day Nancy picked up the gavel and its looks like recovery started as soon as she handed it back
the recovery actually started soon after Obama took office.
in 2008 the GDP was at 0.6% when Bush left office
in Dec 2010 the GDP was 2.6%.
Let's clear up the these-are-seasonal-jobs crap about this report once and for all.
This is directly from ADP's website (uh, they did the report in case you're not paying attention)
Private-sector employment increased by 297,000 from November to December on a seasonally adjusted basis, according to the latest ADP National Employment Report® released today.
Now let's add this from the same site:
The data for both reports is collected for pay periods that can be interpolated to include the week of the 12th of each month, and processed with statistical methodologies similar to those used by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics to compute employment from its monthly survey of establishments.
Now do you need that explained to you? Anyone?
ADP Employment Report
Now, we can all enjoy this falling on deaf ears and all the ignorant wingnuts will continue their dismissals of the report as if the reality of the above doesn't exist.
Nice try, but I've already posted that info. It will never sink in. Wingnuts are immune to facts.
Good grief, that whole post^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^STUPID.
Good grief, that whole post^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^STUPID.
How can you argue with stupid Steph? It's simply incredible there's obama ass lickers in here trying to sound as though obama has been/is good for job creation, when he took office and unemployment was 5.4%, and now it's 9.6%. They must live in an alternate universe or a time warp bubble. I've never seen such a display of outright ignorance and blind kool aide drunk.
A full time job without a specified end date, as opposed to a temp job which is for a limited term.
So you post this now..after posting I was wrong about posting the very same thing.
Gosh..
Which is it?
Because according two your previous post..we are both wrong.
In the week ending Jan. 1, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 409,000, an increase of 18,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 391,000.
well since job losses peaked in Jan 09, right after Obama took control, he has been instrumental in reversing the trend of job losses under Bush. Although this chart only goes until March of 2010, it still shows the Obama trend.
Good grief, that whole post^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^STUPID.
How can you argue with stupid Steph? It's simply incredible there's obama ass lickers in here trying to sound as though obama has been/is good for job creation, when he took office and unemployment was 5.4%, and now it's 9.6%. They must live in an alternate universe or a time warp bubble. I've never seen such a display of outright ignorance and blind kool aide drunk.
Good grief, that whole post^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^STUPID.
well since job losses peaked in Jan 09, right after Obama took control, he has been instrumental in reversing the trend of job losses under Bush. Although this chart only goes until March of 2010, it still shows the Obama trend.
Your chart doesn't prove that either Bush or Obama are responsible for the job losses or gains that took place.
