Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I will have an issue with this if it passes in Colorado:
For example, while an in-state student at the University of Colorado at Boulder would pay $9,152 for 30 hours of credit under the bill, an illegal immigrant would pay $11,012 for the same number of hours.
An out-of-state student would pay $30,330 per year in tuition.
Read more: Colorado tuition bill for illegal immigrants clears House committee but still faces death threat - The Denver Post Colorado tuition bill for illegal immigrants clears House committee but still faces death threat - The Denver Post
Read The Denver Post's Terms of Use of its content: Terms of Use - The Denver Post
what is the inscription on the statue of liberty?
So where is the fine, jail and/or deportation going on?? Not hard to find the illegals...
And all humans huh??? Even the unborn ones?? Good to hear
And nobody is saying that even the illegals don't have a right to be alive or whatever... what is being said is they do not have a right to be here, they do not have a right to suck off the government tit, and they do not have a right to get away with their crimes
Okay, your points are all built on some seriously high-piled bullshit.
For starters, immigration, legal or otherwise, has been stagnant for YEARS. There is not a big invading force, and there aren't waves of people surging over the border.
Secondly, the abortion jab is lame and irrelevant to this discussion. I would argue that it's better to care for that human life once it's you know, born, than it is to put all the emphasis on its rights when it is scientifically not much more than a microscopic symbiote. Maybe if you could prove to me that a zygote could live if we took it from its host uterus at less than 20 weeks I'd buy your religious dogma. Until then?
Lastly, there is no possible way to distinguish, from a statistical point of view, the legal from the illegal immigrants in terms of what kind of goods and services they use. So this nonsense of them sucking us dry is just that...nonsense.
Who do you think costs the taxpayers more: illegal immigrants or Exxon?
Totally uninformed assertion. Any resident of southeastern AZ will tell you otherwise. A simple observation of the area exposes your bullshit.
While I agree that this tactic is wrong- perhaps even illegal- I empathize with the intended outcome. This is to say that I cannot hold these young people responsible for the actions of their parents.
The memo said the government would not pursue immigrants who met five criteria. Individuals must:
Have come to the United States under the age of 16,
Be no older than 30,
Be currently enrolled in school, have graduated high school or served in the military,
Have been in the country for five continuous years, and
Have a clean criminal record.
That's what I thought, it is OK for everyone else to support an Illegal, but you don't want them living with you ... not so liberal are you
.
liberalism has nothing to do with it, most illegals work and provide their own or live with host families.
They pay taxes too.
Okay, your points are all built on some seriously high-piled bullshit.
For starters, immigration, legal or otherwise, has been stagnant for YEARS. There is not a big invading force, and there aren't waves of people surging over the border.
Secondly, the abortion jab is lame and irrelevant to this discussion. I would argue that it's better to care for that human life once it's you know, born, than it is to put all the emphasis on its rights when it is scientifically not much more than a microscopic symbiote. Maybe if you could prove to me that a zygote could live if we took it from its host uterus at less than 20 weeks I'd buy your religious dogma. Until then?
Lastly, there is no possible way to distinguish, from a statistical point of view, the legal from the illegal immigrants in terms of what kind of goods and services they use. So this nonsense of them sucking us dry is just that...nonsense.
Who do you think costs the taxpayers more: illegal immigrants or Exxon?
Totally uninformed assertion. Any resident of southeastern AZ will tell you otherwise. A simple observation of the area exposes your bullshit.
This isn't assertion, dummy. This is unbiased statistical information. That kind of shit matters to some of us.
While I agree that this tactic is wrong- perhaps even illegal- I empathize with the intended outcome. This is to say that I cannot hold these young people responsible for the actions of their parents.
I agree in concept. However, when the rubber hits the road, how can these factors be proven?
The memo said the government would not pursue immigrants who met five criteria. Individuals must:
Have come to the United States under the age of 16,
Be no older than 30,
Be currently enrolled in school, have graduated high school or served in the military,
Have been in the country for five continuous years, and
Have a clean criminal record.
Totally uninformed assertion. Any resident of southeastern AZ will tell you otherwise. A simple observation of the area exposes your bullshit.
This isn't assertion, dummy. This is unbiased statistical information. That kind of shit matters to some of us.
20 or so million illegals trumps your bullshit assertion
While I agree that this tactic is wrong- perhaps even illegal- I empathize with the intended outcome. This is to say that I cannot hold these young people responsible for the actions of their parents.
I agree in concept. However, when the rubber hits the road, how can these factors be proven?
The memo said the government would not pursue immigrants who met five criteria. Individuals must:
Have come to the United States under the age of 16,
Be no older than 30,
Be currently enrolled in school, have graduated high school or served in the military,
Have been in the country for five continuous years, and
Have a clean criminal record.
Not only that, but it's too easy to see where this is headed. Start with the kids, then claim that it's just too cruel to separate them from their parents, so of course we have to let the parents stay. Full on amnesty.
Okay, your points are all built on some seriously high-piled bullshit.
For starters, immigration, legal or otherwise, has been stagnant for YEARS. There is not a big invading force, and there aren't waves of people surging over the border.
Secondly, the abortion jab is lame and irrelevant to this discussion. I would argue that it's better to care for that human life once it's you know, born, than it is to put all the emphasis on its rights when it is scientifically not much more than a microscopic symbiote. Maybe if you could prove to me that a zygote could live if we took it from its host uterus at less than 20 weeks I'd buy your religious dogma. Until then?
Lastly, there is no possible way to distinguish, from a statistical point of view, the legal from the illegal immigrants in terms of what kind of goods and services they use. So this nonsense of them sucking us dry is just that...nonsense.
Who do you think costs the taxpayers more: illegal immigrants or Exxon?
Totally uninformed assertion. Any resident of southeastern AZ will tell you otherwise. A simple observation of the area exposes your bullshit.
This isn't assertion, dummy. This is unbiased statistical information. That kind of shit matters to some of us.
liberalism has nothing to do with it, most illegals work and provide their own or live with host families.
They pay taxes too.
And send billions to Mexico when it should be going back into the US economy.
I love it when Obama jerks the tea party's chain and they start frothing at the mouth.
The INS needs to concentrate on securing the boarders and deporting those that are actually doing harm. We should not deport people that were brought to this country by their parents and are now productive members of society or are attempting to be. These people should be documented as all legal residents are, taxed, and monitored by the INS, and given a chance to make something of themselves in the country they call home.
Obama is a disgusting liar. Then again, everyone knows that:
Flashback: Obama said he wouldnt do executive order on deportations; weve got three branches of government
Flashback: Obama said he wouldnt do executive order on deportations; weve got three branches of government | The Daily Caller
