Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yeah--this happens all of the time. Women in order to snag a boyfriend for life will purposefully "forget" --cough-cough on purpose-to take contraceptives-in order to get pregnant. When the boyfriend cuts out and or tells her there is no way he wants the baby--it's time to run in and get an abortion.
This happens more often that NOT. Planned Parenthood was started to council those PLANNING a family--but it has turned into an abortion clinic for these type women.
As far as I know she never had an abortion with my brother - at the same time I'm sure she did...
Besides, that stupid doped out bitch wasn't capable of being a mother. If they did conceive a child my pro-life parents would have taken the child....
That happens a lot too. Grandparents becoming parents again--because of their loser kids bringing home babies they're incapable of taking care of themselves.
As far as I know she never had an abortion with my brother - at the same time I'm sure she did...
Besides, that stupid doped out bitch wasn't capable of being a mother. If they did conceive a child my pro-life parents would have taken the child....
See this is a good reason for Birth control. Some people shouldn't have children.
I think my son-in-law has the best idea. Sterilize everyone at birth--until they go through examinations of being an adult--financially secure--dope free--and emotionally stable before you unsterilize them to have a baby.
The wording by liberal's on issues they care about is absolutely hysterical. The first paragraph alone uses these hilarious phrases - " reproductive healthcare", "right to choose", and "reproductive health services".
First, since when is MURDER a "service"? You're killing a baby, but because it's so awful, you can't even refer to it as what it is. If something is so awful, you have to avoid what it is and give it a code word (like "service" :lol), maybe you shouldn't be doing it. Can you imagine if if the GOP legalized the rape of women and then started referring to rape as "sexual services"? The liberals would go fucking ape shit. But take a human life, call it "reproductive services" and in the very flawed "logic" of a liberal, that's ok.
Second, I just looked up the word "reproductive" and it says "Producing New Life Or Offspring". Since abortion is the exact opposite of that definition, how can liberals refer to this issue as "reproductive rights" or "reproductive services"?!? You are not producing new life, you are taking a life! You are preventing a life. There is nothing "reproductive" about it you wingnuts!
This is how disingenuous, unhinged, and radical the left has become. They can't even call it what it is (murder, aborting life, etc.) and have an honest discussion about the issue. Does anyone really wonder why there is gridlock in Washington? Who the fuck can work with and compromise with a party that calls killing babies "reproductive healthcare services"????
One thing that always stands out about you anti-choice psychos - you rarely, if ever, mention anything about the mental/physical/financial welfare of the mother. To you zealots, the mother is just an expendable incubator - a pod.
The wording by liberal's on issues they care about is absolutely hysterical. The first paragraph alone uses these hilarious phrases - " reproductive healthcare", "right to choose", and "reproductive health services".
First, since when is MURDER a "service"? You're killing a baby, but because it's so awful, you can't even refer to it as what it is. If something is so awful, you have to avoid what it is and give it a code word (like "service" :lol), maybe you shouldn't be doing it. Can you imagine if if the GOP legalized the rape of women and then started referring to rape as "sexual services"? The liberals would go fucking ape shit. But take a human life, call it "reproductive services" and in the very flawed "logic" of a liberal, that's ok.
Second, I just looked up the word "reproductive" and it says "Producing New Life Or Offspring". Since abortion is the exact opposite of that definition, how can liberals refer to this issue as "reproductive rights" or "reproductive services"?!? You are not producing new life, you are taking a life! You are preventing a life. There is nothing "reproductive" about it you wingnuts!
This is how disingenuous, unhinged, and radical the left has become. They can't even call it what it is (murder, aborting life, etc.) and have an honest discussion about the issue. Does anyone really wonder why there is gridlock in Washington? Who the fuck can work with and compromise with a party that calls killing babies "reproductive healthcare services"????
One thing that always stands out about you anti-choice psychos - you rarely, if ever, mention anything about the mental/physical/financial welfare of the mother. To you zealots, the mother is just an expendable incubator - a pod.
Dr Spencer opens a fresh pack of shiny instruments. He's an extremely calm, softly spoken man, which somehow makes his words all the more devastating. "The foetus can't come out in one go. We haven't dilated sufficiently for that. The foetal parts are soft enough to break apart as they are being removed..."
In other words, he has to dismember the foetus inside the uterus and pull it out, bit by bit. He uses an ultrasound scan to guide him. Even then, some body parts are too large to come out intact.
To illustrate what happens, Dr Spencer grips his thumb between the surgical forceps and squeezes gently. "Those parts are the skull and then the spine and pelvis, and in fact they are crushed..."
Can you imagine the person who would base their vote for someone on whether they support Abortion? or the pretty words for it, a woman's CHOICE
what a sad society we have become
The wording by liberal's on issues they care about is absolutely hysterical. The first paragraph alone uses these hilarious phrases - " reproductive healthcare", "right to choose", and "reproductive health services".
First, since when is MURDER a "service"? You're killing a baby, but because it's so awful, you can't even refer to it as what it is. If something is so awful, you have to avoid what it is and give it a code word (like "service" :lol), maybe you shouldn't be doing it. Can you imagine if if the GOP legalized the rape of women and then started referring to rape as "sexual services"? The liberals would go fucking ape shit. But take a human life, call it "reproductive services" and in the very flawed "logic" of a liberal, that's ok.
Second, I just looked up the word "reproductive" and it says "Producing New Life Or Offspring". Since abortion is the exact opposite of that definition, how can liberals refer to this issue as "reproductive rights" or "reproductive services"?!? You are not producing new life, you are taking a life! You are preventing a life. There is nothing "reproductive" about it you wingnuts!
This is how disingenuous, unhinged, and radical the left has become. They can't even call it what it is (murder, aborting life, etc.) and have an honest discussion about the issue. Does anyone really wonder why there is gridlock in Washington? Who the fuck can work with and compromise with a party that calls killing babies "reproductive healthcare services"????
One thing that always stands out about you anti-choice psychos - you rarely, if ever, mention anything about the mental/physical/financial welfare of the mother. To you zealots, the mother is just an expendable incubator - a pod.
The wording by liberal's on issues they care about is absolutely hysterical. The first paragraph alone uses these hilarious phrases - " reproductive healthcare", "right to choose", and "reproductive health services".
First, since when is MURDER a "service"? You're killing a baby, but because it's so awful, you can't even refer to it as what it is. If something is so awful, you have to avoid what it is and give it a code word (like "service" :lol), maybe you shouldn't be doing it. Can you imagine if if the GOP legalized the rape of women and then started referring to rape as "sexual services"? The liberals would go fucking ape shit. But take a human life, call it "reproductive services" and in the very flawed "logic" of a liberal, that's ok.
Second, I just looked up the word "reproductive" and it says "Producing New Life Or Offspring". Since abortion is the exact opposite of that definition, how can liberals refer to this issue as "reproductive rights" or "reproductive services"?!? You are not producing new life, you are taking a life! You are preventing a life. There is nothing "reproductive" about it you wingnuts!
This is how disingenuous, unhinged, and radical the left has become. They can't even call it what it is (murder, aborting life, etc.) and have an honest discussion about the issue. Does anyone really wonder why there is gridlock in Washington? Who the fuck can work with and compromise with a party that calls killing babies "reproductive healthcare services"????
One thing that always stands out about you anti-choice psychos - you rarely, if ever, mention anything about the mental/physical/financial welfare of the mother. To you zealots, the mother is just an expendable incubator - a pod.
The wording by liberal's on issues they care about is absolutely hysterical. The first paragraph alone uses these hilarious phrases - " reproductive healthcare", "right to choose", and "reproductive health services".
First, since when is MURDER a "service"? You're killing a baby, but because it's so awful, you can't even refer to it as what it is. If something is so awful, you have to avoid what it is and give it a code word (like "service" :lol), maybe you shouldn't be doing it. Can you imagine if if the GOP legalized the rape of women and then started referring to rape as "sexual services"? The liberals would go fucking ape shit. But take a human life, call it "reproductive services" and in the very flawed "logic" of a liberal, that's ok.
Second, I just looked up the word "reproductive" and it says "Producing New Life Or Offspring". Since abortion is the exact opposite of that definition, how can liberals refer to this issue as "reproductive rights" or "reproductive services"?!? You are not producing new life, you are taking a life! You are preventing a life. There is nothing "reproductive" about it you wingnuts!
This is how disingenuous, unhinged, and radical the left has become. They can't even call it what it is (murder, aborting life, etc.) and have an honest discussion about the issue. Does anyone really wonder why there is gridlock in Washington? Who the fuck can work with and compromise with a party that calls killing babies "reproductive healthcare services"????
One thing that always stands out about you anti-choice psychos - you rarely, if ever, mention anything about the mental/physical/financial welfare of the mother. To you zealots, the mother is just an expendable incubator - a pod.
The wording by liberal's on issues they care about is absolutely hysterical. The first paragraph alone uses these hilarious phrases - " reproductive healthcare", "right to choose", and "reproductive health services".
First, since when is MURDER a "service"? You're killing a baby, but because it's so awful, you can't even refer to it as what it is. If something is so awful, you have to avoid what it is and give it a code word (like "service" :lol), maybe you shouldn't be doing it. Can you imagine if if the GOP legalized the rape of women and then started referring to rape as "sexual services"? The liberals would go fucking ape shit. But take a human life, call it "reproductive services" and in the very flawed "logic" of a liberal, that's ok.
Second, I just looked up the word "reproductive" and it says "Producing New Life Or Offspring". Since abortion is the exact opposite of that definition, how can liberals refer to this issue as "reproductive rights" or "reproductive services"?!? You are not producing new life, you are taking a life! You are preventing a life. There is nothing "reproductive" about it you wingnuts!
This is how disingenuous, unhinged, and radical the left has become. They can't even call it what it is (murder, aborting life, etc.) and have an honest discussion about the issue. Does anyone really wonder why there is gridlock in Washington? Who the fuck can work with and compromise with a party that calls killing babies "reproductive healthcare services"????
One thing that always stands out about you anti-choice psychos - you rarely, if ever, mention anything about the mental/physical/financial welfare of the mother. To you zealots, the mother is just an expendable incubator - a pod.
It depends.
How about within our innercities it's legal? Or how about leaving it up to the states? The consitution never gave this kind of powers to the federal government in the first place.
The Roe v. Wade Supreme Court said differently.
My brothers ex-girlfriend was just as bad....... 10-years ago the told my sister that it was ok to fuck around because she could "always get an abortion.".... I just learned that recently.
Oh, and I only had to live with this bitch for about 5 years.. She is gone now and I'm happy.. I never want to see her mug ever again...
Yeah--this happens all of the time. Women in order to snag a boyfriend for life will purposefully "forget" --cough-cough on purpose-to take contraceptives-in order to get pregnant. When the boyfriend cuts out and or tells her there is no way he wants the baby--it's time to run in and get an abortion.
This happens more often that NOT. Planned Parenthood was started to council those PLANNING a family--but it has turned into an abortion clinic for these type women.
Really? Do you have "credible" facts to support that claim?
The poll numbers are worse for Romney among women. In Pennsylvania, Obama leads him among females by a 59 to 35 percent margin; in Florida, 51 to 44; and in Ohio, 58 to 37.
Poll: Obama leads Romney among women voters in key swing states - Yahoo! News
Most eye-popping are the 20-plus-point leads he holds in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Fifty-eight percent of women choose Obama in Ohio, compared with 37 percent for Romney. In Pennsylvania, the 59-35 margin is even greater. And a 7-point lead in Florida is significant, as well.
Women Prefer Obama Over Romney At Staggering Rates - Business Insider
No sane person would deny that abortion is ugly and traumatic, and I've never met anyone who is pro-abortion. However, I know lots of folks who are pro-choice.
Who has priority: Mother or fetus? Roe v. Wade gives the mother priority. Anti-choice zealots want to give the fetus priority.
What say you?
Roe v Wade has been around for 50 years now. It's not going to change. Romney/Ryan have much more important issues on their minds versus birth control pills and what you do with your uterus.
In fact ROMNEY has stated that:
FactCheck.org : Twisting Romneys Abortion StanceDuring a 2007 debate, Romney was asked if he would sign legislation to ban all abortion assuming, hypothetically, that Roe v. Wade had been overturned. He said hed be delighted to sign it, if there was a national consensus for it. But, he said, thats not where America is today. Meanwhile, Romney made clear both before and after that debate that his fuller position was that he opposes abortion except in cases of rape, incest or to save the life of the mother.
Now--I really don't care what women do with their own bodies. I have no intention of paying for your face lift--your boob lift--your liposucktion--or your choice to have an abortion.
I understand the need for an abortion in the instance of rape, incest or the life of the mother--but when you make a choice to have an abortion--I figure it's because you did not make the CHOICE to use birth control contraceptives that prevent pregnancy--and I don't want to pay for your mistakes.
"If you don't have a record to run on, you need to paint your opponent as someone people should run from"--Barack Obama
Just to be clear, what you're saying is your stance on murdering babies is: it's not OK to murder some babies but-----but murdering other babies is A-OK, did I get that right?
hmmm, that's so Romneyesque of you.
Still waiting to find out what rights women think are going to be lost when Romney becomes POTUS.
Still waiting to find out what rights women think are going to be lost when Romney becomes POTUS.
