Obama Becoming A Joke...

[daws101]

odd I never said anything about plagiarizing.. you did! so how could I be lying ?
I did however neglect to post the address on my first draft...which if you weren't trying so hard and failing to cover your inadequacies, you'd would have noticed that I remedied that mistake....

You denied plagiarizing.

You lied.

And, you plagiarized.

Dishonest hack.

Thief.






And, don't do it again here. It's against one of the few rules we have, for good reason - it's copyright infringement. Not YOUR intellectual property, thief.

The problem is that he may not know what plagiarism is.

A sphincter says what!?

 

[Si modo]

odd I never said anything about plagiarizing.. you did! so how could I be lying ?
I did however neglect to post the address on my first draft...which if you weren't trying so hard and failing to cover your inadequacies, you'd would have noticed that I remedied that mistake....

You denied plagiarizing.

You lied.

And, you plagiarized.

Dishonest hack.

Thief.






And, don't do it again here. It's against one of the few rules we have, for good reason - it's copyright infringement. Not YOUR intellectual property, thief.

no I did not
you accused me of it.... would bet good money that you did not investigate to find that information that you just posted.

That makes you a plagiarist - a thief."SI assclown"

it's been ask and answered and your ass is in a crack


__________________

"And you'd be wrong". Your words.

You plagiarized, then when asked about it, you lied and denied that you did. But, keep lying about plagiarizing.

I would bet good money that you did not investigate to find that information that you just posted.

That makes you a plagiarist - a thief.

and you'd be wrong , ....

 

[daws101]

You denied plagiarizing.

You lied.

And, you plagiarized.

Dishonest hack.

Thief.






And, don't do it again here. It's against one of the few rules we have, for good reason - it's copyright infringement. Not YOUR intellectual property, thief.

no I did not
you accused me of it.... would bet good money that you did not investigate to find that information that you just posted.

That makes you a plagiarist - a thief."SI assclown"

it's been ask and answered and your ass is in a crack


__________________

"And you'd be wrong". Your words.

You plagiarized, then when asked about it, you lied and denied that you did. But, keep lying about plagiarizing.

I would bet good money that you did not investigate to find that information that you just posted.

That makes you a plagiarist - a thief.

and you'd be wrong , ....

[/QUOTE] and you were! wrong.... man up and admit your mistake .


"and you'd be wrong , when dealing with people like everything has to be researched as most of what you print is bullshit or cherry picked.


http://tpzoo.wordpress.com/2008/12/1...dministration/

 

[Si modo]

and you were! wrong.... man up and admit your mistake .

Nah. You DID plagiarize. YOU posted work done by others without referencing them.

That's plagiarism.

Idiot.

 

[daws101]

and you were! Wrong.... Man up and admit your mistake .

nah. You did plagiarize. You posted work done by others without referencing them.

That's plagiarism.

Idiot.

only if it's intentional, it was not.... And it was fixed ...ass clown...
Now, since you made the accusation, you must prove it was done with intent to defraud.. If you can't, how bout we talk to the mods about you're attempt to commit slander?

 

[Si modo]

and you were! Wrong.... Man up and admit your mistake .

nah. You did plagiarize. You posted work done by others without referencing them.

That's plagiarism.

Idiot.

only if it's intentional,

.....

Nope.

Stealing is not 'only wrong' whenever it is intentional, either.

Then you lied about copying it.

Wow. Such dishonesty.

 

[daws101]

nah. You did plagiarize. You posted work done by others without referencing them.

That's plagiarism.

Idiot.

only if it's intentional,

.....

nope.

Stealing is not 'only wrong' whenever it is intentional, either.

Then you lied about copying it.

Wow. Such dishonesty.

yes. Another unprovable accusation. Talk about dishonest.

 

[Si modo]

only if it's intentional,

.....

nope.

Stealing is not 'only wrong' whenever it is intentional, either.

Then you lied about copying it.

Wow. Such dishonesty.

yes. Another unprovable accusation. Talk about dishonest.

OMG. What a fucking moron you are. Intent is not a requirement, idiot.

Keep lying. I'm loving exposing your dishonesty. (And, apparently your propensity to project your dishonesty. )

Here, learn something - if that's possible:

What is Plagiarism?

Many people think of plagiarism as copying another's work, or borrowing someone else's original ideas. But terms like "copying" and "borrowing" can disguise the seriousness of the offense:
According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, to "plagiarize" means

to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own
to use (another's production) without crediting the source
to commit literary theft
to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source.

In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else's work and lying about it afterward.
But can words and ideas really be stolen?

According to U.S. law, the answer is yes. The expression of original ideas is considered intellectual property, and is protected by copyright laws, just like original inventions. Almost all forms of expression fall under copyright protection as long as they are recorded in some way (such as a book or a computer file).
All of the following are considered plagiarism:

turning in someone else's work as your own
copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on "fair use" rules)

Most cases of plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed, and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source, is usually enough to prevent plagiarism. See our section on citation for more information on how to cite sources properly.
​

Plagiarism.org : Learning Center : Plagiarism Definitions, Tips on avoiding Plagiarism, Guidelines for proper citation, & Help Indentifying Plagairism

 

[daws101]

nope.

Stealing is not 'only wrong' whenever it is intentional, either.

Then you lied about copying it.

Wow. Such dishonesty.

yes. Another unprovable accusation. Talk about dishonest.

OMG. What a fucking moron you are. Intent is not a requirement, idiot.

Keep lying. I'm loving exposing your dishonesty. (And, apparently your propensity to project your dishonesty. )

Here, learn something - if that's possible:

What is Plagiarism?

Many people think of plagiarism as copying another's work, or borrowing someone else's original ideas. But terms like "copying" and "borrowing" can disguise the seriousness of the offense:
According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, to "plagiarize" means

to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own
to use (another's production) without crediting the source
to commit literary theft
to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source.

In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else's work and lying about it afterward.
But can words and ideas really be stolen?

According to U.S. law, the answer is yes. The expression of original ideas is considered intellectual property, and is protected by copyright laws, just like original inventions. Almost all forms of expression fall under copyright protection as long as they are recorded in some way (such as a book or a computer file).
All of the following are considered plagiarism:

turning in someone else's work as your own
copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on "fair use" rules)

Most cases of plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed, and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source, is usually enough to prevent plagiarism. See our section on citation for more information on how to cite sources properly.
​

Plagiarism.org : Learning Center : Plagiarism Definitions, Tips on avoiding Plagiarism, Guidelines for proper citation, & Help Indentifying Plagairism

your point?
since I corrected that mistake, any other comments you have on the subject are moot!

you are wrong admit it!

 

[Si modo]

yes. Another unprovable accusation. Talk about dishonest.

OMG. What a fucking moron you are. Intent is not a requirement, idiot.

Keep lying. I'm loving exposing your dishonesty. (And, apparently your propensity to project your dishonesty. )

Here, learn something - if that's possible:

What is Plagiarism?

Many people think of plagiarism as copying another's work, or borrowing someone else's original ideas. But terms like "copying" and "borrowing" can disguise the seriousness of the offense:
According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, to "plagiarize" means

to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own
to use (another's production) without crediting the source
to commit literary theft
to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source.

In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else's work and lying about it afterward.
But can words and ideas really be stolen?

According to U.S. law, the answer is yes. The expression of original ideas is considered intellectual property, and is protected by copyright laws, just like original inventions. Almost all forms of expression fall under copyright protection as long as they are recorded in some way (such as a book or a computer file).
All of the following are considered plagiarism:

turning in someone else's work as your own
copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on "fair use" rules)

Most cases of plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed, and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source, is usually enough to prevent plagiarism. See our section on citation for more information on how to cite sources properly.
​

Plagiarism.org : Learning Center : Plagiarism Definitions, Tips on avoiding Plagiarism, Guidelines for proper citation, & Help Indentifying Plagairism

your point?
since I corrected that mistake, any other comments you have on the subject are moot!

you are wrong admit it!

You corrected ONLY after I caught you plagiarizing, and you DENIED that you plagiarized, even when caught red-handed doing so. Then, you tried to sell the lie that you didn't 'intend' to copy what you copied, so it wasn't plagiarism. And, you were lying again.



Dishonest fuck.

 

[daws101]

OMG. What a fucking moron you are. Intent is not a requirement, idiot.

Keep lying. I'm loving exposing your dishonesty. (And, apparently your propensity to project your dishonesty. )

Here, learn something - if that's possible:

What is Plagiarism?

Many people think of plagiarism as copying another's work, or borrowing someone else's original ideas. But terms like "copying" and "borrowing" can disguise the seriousness of the offense:
According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, to "plagiarize" means

to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one's own
to use (another's production) without crediting the source
to commit literary theft
to present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source.

In other words, plagiarism is an act of fraud. It involves both stealing someone else's work and lying about it afterward.
But can words and ideas really be stolen?

According to U.S. law, the answer is yes. The expression of original ideas is considered intellectual property, and is protected by copyright laws, just like original inventions. Almost all forms of expression fall under copyright protection as long as they are recorded in some way (such as a book or a computer file).
All of the following are considered plagiarism:

turning in someone else's work as your own
copying words or ideas from someone else without giving credit
failing to put a quotation in quotation marks
giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation
changing words but copying the sentence structure of a source without giving credit
copying so many words or ideas from a source that it makes up the majority of your work, whether you give credit or not (see our section on "fair use" rules)

Most cases of plagiarism can be avoided, however, by citing sources. Simply acknowledging that certain material has been borrowed, and providing your audience with the information necessary to find that source, is usually enough to prevent plagiarism. See our section on citation for more information on how to cite sources properly.
​

Plagiarism.org : Learning Center : Plagiarism Definitions, Tips on avoiding Plagiarism, Guidelines for proper citation, & Help Indentifying Plagairism

your point?
since I corrected that mistake, any other comments you have on the subject are moot!

you are wrong admit it!

You corrected ONLY after I caught you plagiarizing, and you DENIED that you plagiarized, even when caught red-handed doing so.



Dishonest fuck.

wrong again,you caught no one at nothing.
your right, your reply reminded me that I forgot the link,but any relationship to reality ends there. any less delusional poster would have simply asked for the link.
all your actions after that prove you were attempting to stir up unwarranted and unnecessary shit.... and that's the very pinnacle of dishonesty .

 

[BasicGreatGuy]

The demise of the Republic due to political whores and political cowards is no joke.

When the President, and the other political hacks in Washington talk about creating jobs for the private citizens of the respective states (which they are not authorized to do under the Constitution, not to mention incapable of directly creating jobs) that is code for "we need to expand the size, scope, and power of the federal government, in order to redistribute wealth through current and future regulations, whereby you and your children's children, will forever be in debt to foreign countries."

The same pathetic whore of a entitlement wipe your butt for you government that helped create the demise of the Republic, is claiming to be the savior of the same government the working so hard to transform into some kind of purple barney socialist utpopia. Forget that. I want no part of it.

 

[Stephanie]

your point?
since I corrected that mistake, any other comments you have on the subject are moot!

you are wrong admit it!

You corrected ONLY after I caught you plagiarizing, and you DENIED that you plagiarized, even when caught red-handed doing so.



Dishonest fuck.

wrong again,you caught no one at nothing.
your right, your reply reminded me that I forgot the link,but any relationship to reality ends there. any less delusional poster would have simply asked for the link.
all your actions after that prove you were attempting to stir up unwarranted and unnecessary shit.... and that's the very pinnacle of dishonesty .

give it up already...I asked you how the Bush administration AFFECTED YOU PERSONALLY, and how your life became worst by it....and you post some LIST..
That's ok, maybe you can SLEEP on it and post it tomorrow..

 

[Si modo]

your point?
since I corrected that mistake, any other comments you have on the subject are moot!

you are wrong admit it!

You corrected ONLY after I caught you plagiarizing, and you DENIED that you plagiarized, even when caught red-handed doing so.



Dishonest fuck.

wrong again,you caught no one at nothing.
your right, your reply reminded me that I forgot the link,

.....

And, that's plagiarism.

Moron.

Not even addressing the fact that you didn't even answer Steph's question.

 

[daws101]

You corrected ONLY after I caught you plagiarizing, and you DENIED that you plagiarized, even when caught red-handed doing so.



Dishonest fuck.

wrong again,you caught no one at nothing.
your right, your reply reminded me that I forgot the link,but any relationship to reality ends there. any less delusional poster would have simply asked for the link.
all your actions after that prove you were attempting to stir up unwarranted and unnecessary shit.... and that's the very pinnacle of dishonesty .

give it up already...I asked you how the Bush administration AFFECTED YOU PERSONALLY, and how your life became worst by it....and you post some LIST..
That's ok, maybe you can SLEEP on it and post it tomorrow..

you're also wrong or have English comprehension problems: "assume much?where I live the the unemployment rate is 13%
my wife ( AN engineer) was unemployed for nearly 2 years due to GW'S AND THE GOP'S DISINTEREST IN INFRASTRUCTURE i.E. The company could get no contracts so layoff's were inevitable.
My career was stymied when the bush admin cut funding to THE N.E.A (THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENTS FOR THE ARTS)
Luckily I knew some people who could hook me up with some part work..
then I was diagnosed with leukemia."

 

[daws101]

You corrected ONLY after I caught you plagiarizing, and you DENIED that you plagiarized, even when caught red-handed doing so.



Dishonest fuck.

wrong again,you caught no one at nothing.
your right, your reply reminded me that I forgot the link,

.....

And, that's plagiarism.

Moron.

Not even addressing the fact that you didn't even answer Steph's question.

yes I did:assume much?where I live the the unemployment rate is 13%
my wife ( AN engineer) was unemployed for nearly 2 years due to GW'S AND THE GOP'S DISINTEREST IN INFRASTRUCTURE i.E. The company could get no contracts so layoff's were inevitable.
My career was stymied when the bush admin cut funding to THE N.E.A (THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENTS FOR THE ARTS)
Luckily I knew some people who could hook me up with some part work..
then I was diagnosed with leukemia.: not only dishonest but not very obsevant either.

WHAT I really said: "wrong again,you caught no one at nothing.
your right, your reply reminded me that I forgot the link,but any relationship to reality ends there. any less delusional poster would have simply asked for the link.
all your actions after that prove you were attempting to stir up unwarranted and unnecessary shit.... and that's the very pinnacle of dishonesty ."

Cherry picking is cheap and dishonest.

 

[Stephanie]

wrong again,you caught no one at nothing.
your right, your reply reminded me that I forgot the link,but any relationship to reality ends there. any less delusional poster would have simply asked for the link.
all your actions after that prove you were attempting to stir up unwarranted and unnecessary shit.... and that's the very pinnacle of dishonesty .

give it up already...I asked you how the Bush administration AFFECTED YOU PERSONALLY, and how your life became worst by it....and you post some LIST..
That's ok, maybe you can SLEEP on it and post it tomorrow..

you're also wrong or have English comprehension problems: "assume much?where I live the the unemployment rate is 13%
my wife ( AN engineer) was unemployed for nearly 2 years due to GW'S AND THE GOP'S DISINTEREST IN INFRASTRUCTURE i.E. The company could get no contracts so layoff's were inevitable.
My career was stymied when the bush admin cut funding to THE N.E.A (THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENTS FOR THE ARTS)
Luckily I knew some people who could hook me up with some part work..
then I was diagnosed with leukemia."

what the fxxk, dude.
Due to Bush and the Gops DISINTEREST IN INFRASTRUCTURE. couldn't YOUR WIFE find a job somewhere else.?? why would she BE relying on the Goverment? And just how do you JUSTIFY US TAXPAYERS funding a job for you THROUGH the Goverment...........FOR ART?




I'm sorry about your leukemia, I hope you pull through that.

 

[Si modo]

wrong again,you caught no one at nothing.
your right, your reply reminded me that I forgot the link,

.....

And, that's plagiarism.

Moron.

Not even addressing the fact that you didn't even answer Steph's question.

yes I did:assume much?where I live the the unemployment rate is 13%
my wife ( AN engineer) was unemployed for nearly 2 years due to GW'S AND THE GOP'S DISINTEREST IN INFRASTRUCTURE i.E. The company could get no contracts so layoff's were inevitable.
My career was stymied when the bush admin cut funding to THE N.E.A (THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENTS FOR THE ARTS)
Luckily I knew some people who could hook me up with some part work..
then I was diagnosed with leukemia.: not only dishonest but not very obsevant either.

WHAT I really said: "wrong again,you caught no one at nothing.
your right, your reply reminded me that I forgot the link,but any relationship to reality ends there. any less delusional poster would have simply asked for the link.
all your actions after that prove you were attempting to stir up unwarranted and unnecessary shit.... and that's the very pinnacle of dishonesty ."

Cherry picking is cheap and dishonest.

I did give you a chance to post the link when I said that I would bet good money that you didn't research the data you posted and that would be plagiarism.

Would you have preferred that I didn't even give you a chance to have you post a link and just reported your post? Next time, I will. I promise.

Then you said - YOUR WORDS - "You'd be wrong". Then you posted a link PROVING that I wasn't wrong.

What a fucking moron you are. And, a pathological liar.

As I said, I can pick them out from a mile away at this point.

You plagiarized and lied about doing it, quite lamely lied.

Deal with it, or keep trying to lie out of it. You could have just given the link and moved on, but you kept trying to lie your way out of it. Good grief. If that is worth exposing additional dishonesty on your part, great, I suppose. Odd, in reality.

But, it does give everyone a chance to see what you are, so that's a plus.

 

[Charles_Main]

Obama a Joke? Nothing new there. He Became a Joke shorty after taking office when it became clear everything he said about being open, and Honest, and Bi-Partisan and not just Politics as usual was Pure Horse shit.

His latest lame ass Joke is this Jobs bill, and how he is going around trying to make it look like it would pass if not for Republican Opposition. When the truth is It has not even come up for a Vote in the Senate because Obama can Barley get half the Democrats in the Senate to support his bill.

Americans should be insulted that this Guy thinks he can repackage stimulus again, and then ignore the fact that his own parts is split on the issue and try to Blame Republicans for not passing it, then ride that to Re-Elections.

The Man thinks you are stupid.

 

[daws101]

give it up already...I asked you how the Bush administration AFFECTED YOU PERSONALLY, and how your life became worst by it....and you post some LIST..
That's ok, maybe you can SLEEP on it and post it tomorrow..

you're also wrong or have English comprehension problems: "assume much?where I live the the unemployment rate is 13%
my wife ( AN engineer) was unemployed for nearly 2 years due to GW'S AND THE GOP'S DISINTEREST IN INFRASTRUCTURE i.E. The company could get no contracts so layoff's were inevitable.
My career was stymied when the bush admin cut funding to THE N.E.A (THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENTS FOR THE ARTS)
Luckily I knew some people who could hook me up with some part work..
then I was diagnosed with leukemia."

what the fxxk, dude.
Due to Bush and the Gops DISINTEREST IN INFRASTRUCTURE. couldn't YOUR WIFE find a job somewhere else.?? why would she BE relying on the Goverment? And just how do you JUSTIFY US TAXPAYERS funding a job for you THROUGH the Goverment...........FOR ART?




I'm sorry about your leukemia, I hope you pull through that.

what the fuck Stephanie..my wife did find other jobs.
90% of the engineering field is a public (government) private partnership..when one has no work ,neither has the other.
the same goes for the arts.
the us taxpayers prior to reagan generously supported the arts.. btw my ART is movies and theatre. so unless it's supported by the people or your in the top 10% of people in the film and tv biz it's a hard life.
why is it the consevatives hate the arts?