RetiredGySgt
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
An ass-backwards redneck clown like you doesn't know anything. Maybe you should provide a little evidence before opening your mouth and babbling, idiot.
Well this can be readily solved...
Agnapostate, are you stating, as a fact, that you never implied, nor did you seek to encourage an inference that children should be allowed to engage in coitus at their own discretion, with whomever fell into their favor?
Answer that with a definitive yes or no and we'll examine the record of your posts... if what you declare to be factual is true, then you'll have a public vindication; if what you say is false; then you will be certified as a lying child fucker of the first order; an advocate of the normalization of sexual abnormality; a sexual deviant and a danger to children and whatever culture in which you are found at any given moment.
So what it is sis... Yay or nay?
The whole exercise shouldn't take long...
(Aggrevated-Prostate will now be struck with a severe reticence... a distinct lack of interests in this discussion... for what should be obvious reasons.)
This is a dumb post.
He clearly indicates that he debates the rationality of the standard definition of minority. In that context, your question doesn't make any sense, as you and he are obviously using different definitions of "childhood."
I am guessing based on the silly and childish (by either definition I would think) insistence on a "yay or nay" answer that you realize how silly your question is. If you hadn't realized it before (and that would make you pretty dim), you should now.
Ya so like a guy that justifies screwing children, he thinks it is ok to screw children cause he believes they can give informed consent. Sorry legally and morally they can NOT.
There is no objective way to "test" for adulthood in teens. Further using his logic we should be able to try any teen we want under adult laws when they commit crimes cause after all he insists they are adults.