The crazy hobo on my corner who says Jesus speaks to him is a more credible source than Infowars.
Wow can you come up with a better dodge to a question. Again where is CNNs credibility when they're leaking questions behind the scenes to the candidates they want?? This is coming from someone who thinks infowars is shit, and I believe I was the first In this thread to point it out. Still they weren't leaking info to a candidate for a nationally televised debate...which is a far bigger breach of our democratic system than anything Russia was able to conjure up.
Your question itself was a "dodge".
No matter how uncredible CNN is, they're miles above Infowars.
Which is the only statement I've made on the subject.
I asked a question that was never answered...how am I capable of dodging.
Again infowars was never guilty of leaking questions during nationally televised programming. They probably would, but they don't have the capability. But CNN still
did that, they obviously go out of the way for their candidates in ways that have drastic effects...how are they any better? And CNN is suppose to be one of the gatekeepers of American media.
I'm sorry but you cannot criticize infowars while still defending CNN. They're both turds, and depending on what side you're on one is more polished than the other, they are still both indefensible.
I'm not defending CNN. I don't give a shit about CNN.
You're attempting to put words into my mouth to distract from what I actually did say.
Well you said CNN is miles ahed. And when comparing turds, how is one miles ahed of the other? CNN is just a bigger company that uses the same tactics printed in a prettier picture.
They are. So is the hobo around the corner.
You're not understanding my point - either deliberately, or accidentally.
I am not "defending" CNN. Stating that they are more credible than Infowars is not a "defense" of CNN, because just about anything is more credible than Infowars. It's not a high bar to cross.