- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,823
- 350
Typical liberal bullshit. It's no wonder they push abortion. Of course, it's predominently lib women, mostly minorities, who choose that route. So, the left realized that not enough Republicans were aborting children and that is why they decided to take over schools and start indoctrinating children because they can't tolerate dissenting views. They are against homeschooling because they can't stop parents from teaching their values and morals to their children. The left wants to control what people think and they start early. I am guessing they feel overwhelmed since many parents still take their responsibilites seriously, so now they will try to shame people out of having children. And it's a matter of time before school kids start hearing about how they shouldn't grow up and become parents. Schools will preach for years that it's wrong to bring more children into the world and the left will fight for tax paid birth control and abortions in the school nurse's office. Seriously, they want to do this. They already made rules that allow young girls to have abortions or get birth control without the consent or knowledge of parents. You can't give a kid a fucking Tylenol without forms being signed, but they can have a potentially risky surgery to aid with the liberal's population control.
"Should We Be Having Kids In The Age of Climate Change?"
That was the audacious question NPR’s website and All Things Considered radio show asked on Aug. 18, as it promoted a college professor’s "radical" proposal that people need to have fewer children because of the "prospect of climate catastrophe."
The academic proposed a "carbon tax" on children, to decentivize procreation, in wealthy nations.
NPR correspondent Jennifer Ludden reported that Professor Travis Rieder presented "moral" arguments to James Madison University students, claiming the best way to protect future generations from the threat of climate change is "by not having them."
A philosopher, Rieder told them that having fewer children reduces carbon emissions more effectively than not eating meat, driving hybrid cars, and using eco-friendly appliances. Ludden’s article posted on the NPR website about the interview with Rieder was even more positive. In it she wrote that his claims "sound pretty persuasive in the classroom."
Such anti-life arguments are typical of the left, including the environmental left.
According to the article, Rieder and his Georgetown University colleagues, Colin Hickey and Jake Earl, have a plan to save the earth which was described as "carrots for the poor, sticks for the rich."
They are asking richer nations to "do away with tax breaks for having children and actually penalize new parents."
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/business/mira-ebersole/2016/08/19/
"Should We Be Having Kids In The Age of Climate Change?"
That was the audacious question NPR’s website and All Things Considered radio show asked on Aug. 18, as it promoted a college professor’s "radical" proposal that people need to have fewer children because of the "prospect of climate catastrophe."
The academic proposed a "carbon tax" on children, to decentivize procreation, in wealthy nations.
NPR correspondent Jennifer Ludden reported that Professor Travis Rieder presented "moral" arguments to James Madison University students, claiming the best way to protect future generations from the threat of climate change is "by not having them."
A philosopher, Rieder told them that having fewer children reduces carbon emissions more effectively than not eating meat, driving hybrid cars, and using eco-friendly appliances. Ludden’s article posted on the NPR website about the interview with Rieder was even more positive. In it she wrote that his claims "sound pretty persuasive in the classroom."
Such anti-life arguments are typical of the left, including the environmental left.
According to the article, Rieder and his Georgetown University colleagues, Colin Hickey and Jake Earl, have a plan to save the earth which was described as "carrots for the poor, sticks for the rich."
They are asking richer nations to "do away with tax breaks for having children and actually penalize new parents."
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/business/mira-ebersole/2016/08/19/