Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We had this subject on another thread yesterday.
btw it is not fully public finianced I think the current level of taxpayer funding is 10% or less.
Ame®icano;1871657 said:
no.
nice avatar. did it come with a hood?
We had this subject on another thread yesterday.
btw it is not fully public finianced I think the current level of taxpayer funding is 10% or less.
If it gets .000000000000001% it should remain nonpartisan.
Obama feels he can bailout GM and tell them how to run their business.
I think we should be able to tell NPR what their programming can be.
We had this subject on another thread yesterday.
btw it is not fully public finianced I think the current level of taxpayer funding is 10% or less.
If it gets .000000000000001% it should remain nonpartisan.
Obama feels he can bailout GM and tell them how to run their business.
I think we should be able to tell NPR what their programming can be.
You mean that it can get worse than the bellyaching about Fix News?Really smart...and really unethical. If the shoe was on the other food imagine the whining in Washington that we would be hearing about using taxpayer dollars to elect Republicans.
Ame®icano;1871657 said:
We had this subject on another thread yesterday.
btw it is not fully public finianced I think the current level of taxpayer funding is 10% or less.
If it gets .000000000000001% it should remain nonpartisan.
Obama feels he can bailout GM and tell them how to run their business.
I think we should be able to tell NPR what their programming can be.
so you believe in censorship?
well, AQ agreed with you regarding cartoons depicting mohammed.
tell me how you're better than them again.
If it gets .000000000000001% it should remain nonpartisan.
Obama feels he can bailout GM and tell them how to run their business.
I think we should be able to tell NPR what their programming can be.
so you believe in censorship?
well, AQ agreed with you regarding cartoons depicting mohammed.
tell me how you're better than them again.
I think censorship is bad.
I think giving both sides equal time is only fair.
After all....I'm not afraid of debating issues many Libs claim are closed to discussion.
Nope.Ame®icano;1871657 said:
Stll funny as heck, but most humor is biased.
Comparing lawn mowers to apples is irrelevant.so you believe in censorship?
well, AQ agreed with you regarding cartoons depicting mohammed.
tell me how you're better than them again.
I think censorship is bad.
I think giving both sides equal time is only fair.
After all....I'm not afraid of debating issues many Libs claim are closed to discussion.
so you support the Fairness Doctrine?
Comparing lawn mowers to apples is irrelevant.I think censorship is bad.
I think giving both sides equal time is only fair.
After all....I'm not afraid of debating issues many Libs claim are closed to discussion.
so you support the Fairness Doctrine?