NOW THIS IS PROBABLY THE CRAZIEST POLICE STORY YOU'RE GOING TO HEAR. PERIOD.

ClosedCaption

Diamond Member
Sep 15, 2010
53,233
6,719
1,830
Unarmed Man Is Charged With Wounding Bystanders Shot by Police Near Times Square

An unarmed, emotionally disturbed man shot at by the police as he was lurching around traffic near Times Square in September has been charged with assault, on the theory that he was responsible for bullet wounds suffered by two bystanders, according to an indictment unsealed in State Supreme Court in Manhattan on Wednesday.

A curious crowd grew. Police officers arrived and tried to corral Mr. Broadnax, a 250-pound man. When he reached into his pants pocket, two officers, who, the police said, thought he was pulling a gun, opened fire, missing Mr. Broadnax, but hitting two nearby women. Finally, a police sergeant knocked Mr. Broadnax down with a Taser.

The shootings once again raised questions about the police use of firearms in crowded areas and drew comparisons to a shooting a year ago, when officers struck nine bystanders in front of the Empire State Building when they killed an armed murder suspect.

Initially Mr. Broadnax was arrested on misdemeanor charges of menacing, drug possession and resisting arrest. But the Manhattan district attorney’s office persuaded a grand jury to charge Mr. Broadnax with assault, a felony carrying a maximum sentence of 25 years. Specifically, the nine-count indictment unsealed on Wednesday said Mr. Broadnax “recklessly engaged in conduct which created a grave risk of death.”

(Because remember folks prosecutors can indict a ham sandwich

“The defendant is the one that created the situation that injured innocent bystanders,” said an assistant district attorney, Shannon Lucey.

The two police officers, who have not been identified, have been placed on administrative duty and their actions are still under investigation by the district attorney’s office, law enforcement officials said. They also face an internal Police Department inquiry.

Mr. Broadnax’s lawyer, Rigodis Appling, said Mr. Broadnax suffered from anxiety and depression and had been disoriented and scared when the police shot at him. He was reaching for his wallet, not a gun, she said. “Mr. Broadnax never imagined his behavior would ever cause the police to shoot at him,” she said.

After his arrest, Mr. Broadnax was taken to Bellevue Hospital Center, where he told a detective that “he was talking to dead relatives in his head and that he tried throwing himself in front of cars to kill himself,” according to a court document released on Wednesday.

A judge ordered a mental evaluation, and a psychiatrist later found Mr. Broadnax competent to stand trial, Ms. Appling said.

On Wednesday, Justice Gregory Carro set bail at $100,000 bond or $50,000 cash.

Mariann Wang, a lawyer representing Sahar Khoshakhlagh, one of the women who was wounded, said the district attorney should be pursuing charges against the two officers who fired their weapons in a crowd, not against Mr. Broadnax. “It’s an incredibly unfortunate use of prosecutorial discretion to be prosecuting a man who didn’t even injure my client,” she said. “It’s the police who injured my client.”


 
This is just the standard felony murder rule. Nothing to get excited about.
 
Dont worry guys. Slowly but surely the cops are standing down. They'll soon only respond to very serious crimes.

You all.get to fend for yourselves the rest of the time.

GOOD LUCK!
 
Dont worry guys. Slowly but surely the cops are standing down. They'll soon only respond to very serious crimes.

You all.get to fend for yourselves the rest of the time.

GOOD LUCK!

Can we start somewhere in the middle? Like just dont shoot into crowds and charge others for it?
 
If he is trying to kill himself, how can he be responsible for resisting arrest? It is expected that an officer would need to become physical to stop someone in traffic from suicide. This assault charge is a total farce.
 
.

We can always count on the PC Police to attack the real police, to find stories that support their loathing, to ignore all the good.

I suspect their constant quest for control has them a little jealous of the men and women in blue.

.


I was thinking about this last night. The problem is that whenever something like this happens and someone reports it then people who support the police no matter what say its not true, dont know the whole story etc.

So in response people on the "this is true" side find more cases to bolster their stance on it.

Instead of the constant defenders admitting that it is true and this happens. They (you) get upset that they are now proving it happens more than you think so you brand them as cop haters.

Its simple defense. If you accused someone of not having a job. And then they brought you their paychecks as proof. You could just claim that person hates people without jobs or something..
 
There is always going to be some case of police being out of order.

Yes, there are times when cops do things that piss me off. But most of the time they are all doing a fantastic job putting up with the low life scum of society on a daily basis.

It can't be easy being a police officer.
 

Forum List

Back
Top