Now that Franken has resigned...

Yea, another nonsensical conspiracy theory in order to save Trump's reputation.

The anything but Trump movement will stop at nothing.

We've already seen that.

How bout that fake Hillary dossier that got the ball rolling with Mueller?
The “fake” dossier? Some of it’s been confirmed by the FBI.

No. It's a fake and the guy who confirmed it has been demoted and taken off the investigation.

Top DOJ official demoted amid probe of contacts with Trump dossier firm

Until Wednesday morning, Bruce G. Ohr held two titles at DOJ: associate deputy attorney general, a post that placed him four doors down from his boss, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein; and director of the Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Forces (OCDETF), a program described by the department as “the centerpiece of the attorney general’s drug strategy.”

Ohr will retain his OCDETF title but has been stripped of his higher post and ousted from his office on the fourth floor of “Main Justice.”

There is no mention in your link about 'the guy who confirmed it'.

So far, two of the agents who presented the dossier and verified it have been dismissed from the investigation. You might personally want to hang on to this loser but everyone else is running.

Nope, sorry, your link doesn't say what you think it does.
 
When will Trump follow his lead and do the same. I mean, they both have admitted to sexual misconduct. Shouldn't we hold all elected officials to the same standards?

Franken made it clear in his resignation speech that Trump was the target.

In fact, I would wager that all of these "sex scandals" were started just to take Trump out.

Don't believe me? Well men like Conyers and Weinstein were known to have these issues for decades, yet no one did anything about it. That is, till Trump won and had similar baggage from the past. Now all of a sudden we all care about women's rights?

Michelle Obama gave a speech about Weinstein regarding what a wonderful human being he was, despite everyone knowing he was a sexual predator. I don't buy for a minute that anything has changed other than Trump getting elected.



Thank Trump for all of these men being left out to dry, they are just sacrificial lambs who will never see jail time.


Yea, another nonsensical conspiracy theory in order to save Trump's reputation.


The anything but Trump movement will stop at nothing.

We've already seen that.

How bout that fake Hillary dossier that got the ball rolling with Mueller?

The “fake” dossier? Some of it’s been confirmed by the FBI.







Oh? Which part is that?
 
When will Trump follow his lead and do the same. I mean, they both have admitted to sexual misconduct. Shouldn't we hold all elected officials to the same standards?

Franken made it clear in his resignation speech that Trump was the target.

In fact, I would wager that all of these "sex scandals" were started just to take Trump out.

Don't believe me? Well men like Conyers and Weinstein were known to have these issues for decades, yet no one did anything about it. That is, till Trump won and had similar baggage from the past. Now all of a sudden we all care about women's rights?

Michelle Obama gave a speech about Weinstein regarding what a wonderful human being he was, despite everyone knowing he was a sexual predator. I don't buy for a minute that anything has changed other than Trump getting elected.



Thank Trump for all of these men being left out to dry, they are just sacrificial lambs who will never see jail time.

Yup Trump was just an innocent dupe and they were all lying. After all how else can you justify knowingly voting him into office while denouncing the opposition for the same thing? Strange how they are always liars when it is the other guy. Now let’s redirect to Obama. We can’t find a sex scandal on him but we can a statement to smear his wife by linking her to Weinstein and implying she had to know.


Trump never denounced anyone during the campaign, and leftwing starlets and congressional staff are the ones turning in the Dim sexual predators. It isn't the right.

Really...so he didnt have Clinton's accuse rs involved...? Denouncing old Bill?
 
Let's see: Join date last month? check.

Low post count, likes received, trophy points, and ratings? check.

Doesn't look to me like you've been around internet forums much , noob. Come back when you figure out how they work.

Let's see:
171 posts in one month?
You have a total of 4,855, with a join date of 2011, for an average of 809 posts a year, so at the rate I am going, I'll be passing you by in a fraction of the time, because in six more years I'll have a total three times larger...12,312.

Now let's try trophy points!
IN ONE MONTH I earned 31 trophy points. If I keep at it for six years at the same rate, I'll be at 2,322 trophy points compared to your 380 over YOUR six year tenure.

You don't have the foggiest notion how long I've been in other forums, and your scores aren't that great for someone who's been irritating people with your Ayn Rand worship for six years, so if I were you, I'd probably take it on the chin and watch and see what this Strangler guy is all about before shooting your wad.

You don't have the patience of Howard Roark, you don't have the critical thinking skills of Ms. Rand, you don't have a track record worth mentioning (a lot of folks who have been at USMB for six years have TENS of thousands of posts and THOUSANDS of trophy points) and you have a tendency to not look before you leap.


Why you change your handle?

I know exactly who you are on the other boards, your writing style is obvious
 
When will Trump follow his lead and do the same. I mean, they both have admitted to sexual misconduct. Shouldn't we hold all elected officials to the same standards?

Franken made it clear in his resignation speech that Trump was the target.

In fact, I would wager that all of these "sex scandals" were started just to take Trump out.

Don't believe me? Well men like Conyers and Weinstein were known to have these issues for decades, yet no one did anything about it. That is, till Trump won and had similar baggage from the past. Now all of a sudden we all care about women's rights?

Michelle Obama gave a speech about Weinstein regarding what a wonderful human being he was, despite everyone knowing he was a sexual predator. I don't buy for a minute that anything has changed other than Trump getting elected.



Thank Trump for all of these men being left out to dry, they are just sacrificial lambs who will never see jail time.


Yea, another nonsensical conspiracy theory in order to save Trump's reputation.


The anything but Trump movement will stop at nothing.

We've already seen that.

How bout that fake Hillary dossier that got the ball rolling with Mueller?

The “fake” dossier? Some of it’s been confirmed by the FBI.







Oh? Which part is that?

Don’t know. The news only reported that some parts were confirmed by the FBI.
 
Franken made it clear in his resignation speech that Trump was the target.

In fact, I would wager that all of these "sex scandals" were started just to take Trump out.

Don't believe me? Well men like Conyers and Weinstein were known to have these issues for decades, yet no one did anything about it. That is, till Trump won and had similar baggage from the past. Now all of a sudden we all care about women's rights?

Michelle Obama gave a speech about Weinstein regarding what a wonderful human being he was, despite everyone knowing he was a sexual predator. I don't buy for a minute that anything has changed other than Trump getting elected.



Thank Trump for all of these men being left out to dry, they are just sacrificial lambs who will never see jail time.


Yea, another nonsensical conspiracy theory in order to save Trump's reputation.


The anything but Trump movement will stop at nothing.

We've already seen that.

How bout that fake Hillary dossier that got the ball rolling with Mueller?

The “fake” dossier? Some of it’s been confirmed by the FBI.







Oh? Which part is that?

Don’t know. The news only reported that some parts were confirmed by the FBI.







So far I have seen nothing credible that ANY part of the dossier was factual. There are multiple claims that have however been PROVEN false. In a Court of Law the rule is "if one part is a lie, all parts are lies" applies very well to this "document".
 
Yea, another nonsensical conspiracy theory in order to save Trump's reputation.

The anything but Trump movement will stop at nothing.

We've already seen that.

How bout that fake Hillary dossier that got the ball rolling with Mueller?
The “fake” dossier? Some of it’s been confirmed by the FBI.






Oh? Which part is that?
Don’t know. The news only reported that some parts were confirmed by the FBI.






So far I have seen nothing credible that ANY part of the dossier was factual. There are multiple claims that have however been PROVEN false. In a Court of Law the rule is "if one part is a lie, all parts are lies" applies very well to this "document".

Can you site that rule?
 
When will Trump follow his lead and do the same. I mean, they both have admitted to sexual misconduct. Shouldn't we hold all elected officials to the same standards?

There's big difference between a do-nothing Senator from Minnesota, and the greatest President this country has ever seen.

Are there pictures of these things Trump said he did, or was it just locker talk? And why are women not coming out of the woodwork to accuse him, like there were Franken?

Frankens election was full of questions as well.

What does one expect from a leftover from SNL???


True. There were suspicions of voter fraud when he was elected.
 
I’ve heard women I know do it a few times, for sure. Boasting how great their sex life is, how well hung a guy is, etc and come to find out they really aren’t having any. Lol
As a maintenance guy girls do it worse ..
Boasting about one’s Sex life is one thing. Boasting about sexual assault is quite another.

These cretins don't know the difference. It's what makes them Republicans.

It's you who doesn't know the difference. "They let you" means it's not assault. It's voluntary. How many times does that have to be repeated before it penetrates the skulls of morons like you?
Rightard.... the assaulter saying they wanted it is like OJ saying his ex-wife wanted her throat slit.


Karma will always get you
 
Franken didn't express remorse. He blamed everyone but himself. He isn't sorry for what he did. He's just bitter because he got caught and his Party bosses forced him out. He had a chance to show some honor and dignity, but he chose instead to go the classless route. He's truly not sorry for what he did. He's a very bad person. Period, end of story.
 
Let's see: Join date last month? check.

Low post count, likes received, trophy points, and ratings? check.

Doesn't look to me like you've been around internet forums much , noob. Come back when you figure out how they work.

Let's see:
171 posts in one month?
You have a total of 4,855, with a join date of 2011, for an average of 809 posts a year, so at the rate I am going, I'll be passing you by in a fraction of the time, because in six more years I'll have a total three times larger...12,312.

Now let's try trophy points!
IN ONE MONTH I earned 31 trophy points. If I keep at it for six years at the same rate, I'll be at 2,322 trophy points compared to your 380 over YOUR six year tenure.

You don't have the foggiest notion how long I've been in other forums, and your scores aren't that great for someone who's been irritating people with your Ayn Rand worship for six years, so if I were you, I'd probably take it on the chin and watch and see what this Strangler guy is all about before shooting your wad.

You don't have the patience of Howard Roark, you don't have the critical thinking skills of Ms. Rand, you don't have a track record worth mentioning (a lot of folks who have been at USMB for six years have TENS of thousands of posts and THOUSANDS of trophy points) and you have a tendency to not look before you leap.


Why you change your handle?

I know exactly who you are on the other boards, your writing style is obvious

----I've used this handle for many years...I've BEEN using my real name on some boards.
DO we know each other?
Are we buddies? :bye1:
 
Thanks for changing topics which would be an admission by you that you were wrong.

He also seems hesitant to answer my question, which was: What exactly do you think Affirmative Action does?

when you respond to someone, you shouldn't delete the link to their post. I have no idea what you're responding to.
Point taken, and in my defense, I am just not that good at trimming multiple replies yet so I finally just did the blind quote to get the response on there.
 
Michelle Obama gave a speech about Weinstein regarding what a wonderful human being he was, despite everyone knowing he was a sexual predator. I don't buy for a minute that anything has changed other than Trump getting elected.



Thank Trump for all of these men being left out to dry, they are just sacrificial lambs who will never see jail time.


If Hillary had given that speech, I could almost buy your theory, because Bill and Hillz DID have a ton of Hollywood friends, for MANY years.
Barack and Michelle, not so much until he became a candidate back in 2008.

And as regards, "everyone knowing" Harvey was a predator, you can say that about insiders, people IN "the industry".
Yes, when it came to people "in the industry" it was something of an open secret.
The OTHER open secret, which was actually an OPEN FACT, was that Weinstein was literally the 800 pound gorilla in the industry and could make or break almost anyone. He was an actual Hollywood "kingmaker" almost the likes of which only used to exist in the days of the old Hollywood Studio System.

But unless you hob-nobbed with Hollywood types all day long, and you were just in the normal circles on the periphery, the most you were likely to hear were rumors, vague ones, because those "in the industry" were kind of hesitant to point the spotlight on Harvey.

I know, I WAS in the industry, and you didn't want to poke the bear, unless you wanted to be eaten.

So my point is, if Michelle was even coached at all for that speech, and I suspect she would have been, she was probably coached to sweeten it for Harvey, because that would make Harvey do nice things.


They joked about Harvey at the Oscars on camera openly.

You really don't think the Obama's knew?

I reckon Barak learned about it just like the IRS scandal and VA scandal, on the 6 o'clock news like the rest of us.

Hilarious.


Neither of us know how much they knew.
I know how much my peers knew...some knew plenty, some only knew folklore, but many feared to poke the bear. In my very young early days in the industry I got a chance to do a PERSONAL project for Les Moonves.
His aging father's birthday, and Les wanted to assemble some footage and have some graphics.
He stressed that he wanted a large font..."the LARGEST FONT"
I underestimated how large the font should be.
Les LOVED the way I edited the footage together, and had I just gone with the absolute biggest font available he would have loved the entire project, and I would have had a killer job, maybe for life...I was a KID.
I went two sizes smaller, Les was PISSED, and I was OUT THE DOOR five minutes later and never saw hide nor hair of him again.
Les Moonves, look him up.
Like I said, don't poke the bear.

Harvey Weinstein could put you on top of the world or send you to Hell in this industry on a whim.
 
Read the rules. If you wish to have a discussion without all the flames open a thread in the Clean Debate Zone. None of that crap is allowed and we monitor it closely.

Point taken!
It doesn't even APPROACH the level that would be dubbed "flaming", by the way.
In order to be worthy of that sobriquet, it would have to have some value, even if only comic value.
So in other words, you're PROUD that USMB's quality resembles the comments section on YouTube, or Craigslist Rants and Raves.
 
I find it hilarious that all you had to do was ask a bitch what is it they think affirmative action is and watch the Republican flee like his ass was on fire.

LoLz!

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

It was an honest question, wasn't it?
When people find out what Affirmative Action really is, it sounds like the honorable thing to do.

MYTH: Affirmative Action GIVES jobs to people who don't deserve them, provides openings for unqualified candidates to fudge scores, and knocks deserving qualified people out of the running, because at its heart, Affirmative Action is a form of reverse discrimination.

FACT: Affirmative Action merely PLACES candidates at an appropriate place in line as if there were no ethnic or racial criteria being observed. It is a de facto anonymizer.
Affirmative Action puts candidates face to face with opportunities which have been historically unavailable to them due to historic discrimination factors.
Once an Affirmative Action candidate gets that opportunity, they have to earn it like anyone else, and by that I mean, if they get a job, or get placement in higher education, and they don't perform, the school or employer is under NO OBLIGATION, legal or otherwise, TO KEEP that candidate or employee.
The free market takes over once an Affirmative Action candidate is placed.
It is a corrective measure only.
 
Last edited:
Tell me this: How does someone "dumb as a sack of rocks" become a multi-billionaire, marry a super model, and become the greatest President America has ever had?

The truly dumb one is the schmuck who ends up being a do-nothing Senator from a worthless socialist state where every other person you see is from Somalia. A Senator who is no longer a Senator, I might add. Now that's pretty damned dumb.

Hi daddy gave him money and he still has managed to file for Chapter 11 on more than 6 occasions.

Models love rich men, no matter how ugly they are. Trump is proof of that.

And he became the worst president in the history of the USA because Bernie Sanders voters threw their toys out of the cot, and Deplorables got out in huge numbers. Still, 3 million more wanted Hillary. Fact.
 
I find it hilarious that all you had to do was ask a bitch what is it they think affirmative action is and watch the Republican flee like his ass was on fire.

LoLz!

Sent from my SM-T587P using Tapatalk

Affirmative action is legal discrimination against white anglo saxon males.

Is that what you call "fleeing?"

If an employer hires someone via Affirmative Action, and they cannot perform, is the employer legally required to keep that employee?
 
The anything but Trump movement will stop at nothing.

We've already seen that.

How bout that fake Hillary dossier that got the ball rolling with Mueller?
The “fake” dossier? Some of it’s been confirmed by the FBI.






Oh? Which part is that?
Don’t know. The news only reported that some parts were confirmed by the FBI.






So far I have seen nothing credible that ANY part of the dossier was factual. There are multiple claims that have however been PROVEN false. In a Court of Law the rule is "if one part is a lie, all parts are lies" applies very well to this "document".

Can you site that rule?






Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus Is the term, the Ninth most recently used it in a immigration case.


Enying Li v. Holder, 738 F.3d 1160, 1168 (9th Cir. 2013).
 
The “fake” dossier? Some of it’s been confirmed by the FBI.






Oh? Which part is that?
Don’t know. The news only reported that some parts were confirmed by the FBI.






So far I have seen nothing credible that ANY part of the dossier was factual. There are multiple claims that have however been PROVEN false. In a Court of Law the rule is "if one part is a lie, all parts are lies" applies very well to this "document".

Can you site that rule?






Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus Is the term, the Ninth most recently used it in a immigration case.


Enying Li v. Holder, 738 F.3d 1160, 1168 (9th Cir. 2013).

That's applicable to witness testimony only. Nice try but fail.
 

Forum List

Back
Top