Lewdog
Gold Member
You didn't give a definition first, you just said that all politicians are prideful. You're such a dipshit. You've been proven to not know what you are talking about, and this coming after you jumped into the conversation with your little quip. All politicians may be prideful, but that doesn't mean that it will result in hubris. They are not the same thing.
Trump is so prideful of himself and thinks he is so smart, that when Clinton said he didn't pay any taxes as an insult, instead of defending himself, he took his vanity of being so smart, and admitted guilt through it. That's hubris to a "t."
I'm sorry you can't understand the difference. Pick up a book every once in awhile other than a dictionary, you'll learn something.
Prideful is an acceptable term for hubris.
and FYI hubris is not a result.
Prideful is an element of hubris.
Hubris is extreme pride and arrogance shown by a character that ultimately brings about his downfall.
Hubris - Examples and Definition of Hubris
Same as I said before. It's a concept, a literary device, an act, not an adjective.
Now on to discussing things worthwhile.
It's a noun not an adjective.
And the literary device is a use of the word not the definition of the word
Dude...the literary device was created long before it was ever given a definition and put in a dictionary.
the word had to be defined before it could be used as a literary device
Do you think the ancient Greeks didn't have definitions of words?
Haha...look. I said Trump's actions were the definition of hubris. Some people here understood the reference, you didn't. You interjected your quip that all politicians are prideful, which though may be true, isn't what the act of hubris is as a whole, and not what Trump's actions completely were. You're wrong, why can't you just admit it and move on? Seriously? Do you think the longer you argue that all of a sudden the past is going to change and make you correct? Just give up. you're wrong. Move on. Find some other subject to troll about.