NOBEL Prize Winners Say NO to AGW........

[TyroneSlothrop]

Do you think that trying divine OPINION from shuffling academic papers around

I am pretty sure only you are wise enough informed enough and Scientific enough to know truth....

 

[flacaltenn]

Do ALL these scientists agree on what the MULTIPLIERS are? Nope. /QUOTE]
.

I am not into Gish Galloping with wing nuts sorry bro...ask your multipliers question when they are giving you the Nobel Prize ...any day now your absolute genius will be recognized..

So in other words, you are yet another partisan spinster with NO INTEREST in any aspect of the theory you support. Where DID those projections of 6 or 8 degC rise by 2100 come from? When were they made, and what are they TODAY... Fuck your oil company conspiracy theory. The Warmers have pretty much destroyed themselves with their exaggerated claims and screwing with open scientific process. Didn't NEED Exxon money to FAIL at VIRTUALLY EVERY PREDICTION they've made -- in just 3 decades. No more accurate than Nobel Prize winner Al Gore on the topic.. Smarter? Sure -- but they got on a gravy train of unlimited money for anything Global Warming and HAD to Exaggerate to make the sponsors happy..

 

[Crick]

So you're all in for the global conspiracy theory? Good to know.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The Mainau Declaration 2015 on Climate Change The Lindau Nobel Laureate Meetings

I can see why Billy is melting down. 36 Nobel laureates for, and only one against. That even beats 97%.

Giaver, the sole dissenter, is 86 years old. His climate science just stinks, the same dumb denier fallacies that have been debunked so many times. It's hilarious how the best the deniers can do now is getting one senile scientist on their side. They're actually bragging about it. I guess when that's all you've got, you have to fixate on it.

Fucktard hairball lies again.... there were 65 (that's sixty five) attendees. Got to laugh at your lying and intentional misdirection. Right on cue...

 

[Billy_Bob]

But...but...but...consensus...settled science!

Figure 3: Distribution of the number of researchers convinced by the evidence ofanthropogenicclimate change(green) and unconvinced by the evidence (red) with a given number of totalclimatepublications(Anderegg 2010).

BWhaaaaaaa COOK ET AL.... Epic FAIL

 

[Billy_Bob]

The meme that 97% of scientists support AGW is a lie.

Why not?

prove its a lie right now ...prove it....you are just another drooler prove that scientist are on your side of this issue asshole

In the scientific field of climate studies – which is informed by many different disciplines – the consensus is demonstrated by the number of scientists who have stopped arguing about what is causing climate change– and that’s nearly all of them. A survey of 928 peer-reviewed abstracts on the subject 'global climate change' published between 1993 and 2003 shows that not a single paper rejected the consensus position that global warming is man caused(Oreskes 2004).

Cook Et Al is a perfect example of the lie. Cook took all papers written on the subject (11,964 to be exact) threw out all but 74 (because they did not conform to his agenda) and then claimed that only 3 papers dissented. Giving him his 97% number.

Legates Et Al contacted the researchers of those papers and discussed at length their real positions. They also contacted many others of the discarded papers. they found out that Cook misrepresented their positions in nearly all cases and that only 3 papers of the indicated that MAN was the sole cause of our current warming...

COOK LIED! and all the papers supporting Cooks lie are also fabricated.

When all papers are considered the percentage of papers which claimed man is the sole cause was 0.03%.

Now that is an EPIC FAIL...

 

[MisterBeale]

Something is Affecting the Entire Solar System

PLANETOPHYSICAL STATE OF THE EARTH AND LIFE
A doubling of the Sun's coronal magnetic field during the past 100 years
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v399/n6735/full/399437a0.html
The solar wind is an extended ionized gas of very high electrical conductivity, and therefore drags some magnetic flux out of the Sun to fill the heliosphere with a weak interplanetary magnetic field1,2. Magnetic reconnection—the merging of oppositely directed magnetic fields—between the interplanetary field and the Earth's magnetic field allows energy from the solar wind to enter the near-Earth environment. The Sun's properties, such as its luminosity, are related to its magnetic field, although the connections are still not well understood3,4. Moreover, changes in the heliospheric magnetic field have been linked with changes in total cloud cover over the Earth, which may influence global climate5. Here we show that measurements of the near-Earth interplanetary magnetic field reveal that the total magnetic flux leaving the Sun has risen by a factor of 1.4 since 1964: surrogate measurements of the interplanetary magnetic field indicate that the increase since 1901 has been by a factor of 2.3. This increase may be related to chaotic changes in the dynamo that generates the solar magnetic field. We do not yet know quantitatively how such changes will influence the global environment.


First Photos of Water Ice on Mercury Captured by NASA Spacecraft
First Photos of Water Ice on Mercury Captured by NASA Spacecraft
More than 20 years ago, Earth-based radar imaging first spotted signs of water ice near Mercury's north and south poles — a surprise, perhaps, given that temperatures on the solar system's innermost planet can top 800 degrees Fahrenheit (427 degrees Celsius).

Many more links are in the video for those who are really curious about nature, and the fact that our solar system IS in fact traveling around the Galactic Core. As it does, it experiences changes. Our ancestors knew this, and warned us that these changes were coming and to be prepared. In many different cultures they knew these global changes were in store. They are now happening. Get used to it.

The fact that some elites realize that these changes are happening, and are hiding the causes from the masses, and the fact that they have decided to use them to create a global government with global taxation on the poor and middle class, to use these changes as a mechanism to tighten their political control on the masses, is analogous to the shaman and the chief of a stone aged tribes realizing that a solar eclipse is a natural phenomena, but none the less using it's prediction as a sign that they are divinely endowed by the spirits and the gods with the right to rule over their people.

It's despicable is what it is.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Facts are facts and you have none.

Fact number one

Heartland Institute has Zero Scientific credibility

Fact Number two
your big scientist expert has never ever written any papers on Climate ...never

Fact number 3...Consensus
I have presented links showing that a survey of Climate Scientific papers has shown no papers presented denying Climate change

Fact Number Four
The Japanese Meteorological Agency'
The UK Meteorological Agency
NASA and NOAA in the US
97 percent of Climate Scientist
Pope Francis
all agree with me

You are squirrel with a bag of nuts... And you are nuttier than hell.

You use Ad-hominum attacks right off the top. You do not address the science and go right to attacking the professional demeanor and his knowledge, when you haven't a clue about any of it. The man is one of the smartest people on the planet in the physics world. Yet without even a shred of credible evidence you attack him.

You are a left wing idiot shill. Nothing more.

As you can not refute his science with logic and cognitive thought why dont you go play with yourself..

 

[MisterBeale]

The fact is, none of the scientists and none of the politicians KNOW what is going to happen. Why? Because none of us have ever been here before.

 

[Billy_Bob]

For you Right winger the word "anthropogenic" means caused by folk's activities...us humans

Of more than 4,000 academic papers published over 20 years, 97.1% agreed that climate change is anthropogenic

Climate research nearly unanimous on human causes survey finds Environment The Guardian

BULL SHIT

Cook’s 97% consensus is a case study of Agnotology – ignorance and misinformation.

In the latest volley, from Legates et al 2013, John Cook’s “97% consensus” survey has become the case study in agnotology. Based on incorrect results, a flawed method, and a logical fallacy, it kept key facts hidden while sloppily blending vague language into a form that is easily and actively misinterpreted. That it passed peer-review is another damning indictment of peer review.

Cook still refuses to provide about half the data, but the data that has been made public shows (after some digging) that a mere 41 papers out of 12,000 was called a 97% consensus. The trick is that Cook et al interchangeably use different definitions of consensus.

Source

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

As you can not refute his science with logic and cognitive thought why dont you go play with yourself..

Pull yourself together man you are hysterical...

Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Consensus

Temperature data from four international science institutions. All show rapid warming in the past few decades and that the last decade has been the warmest on record.

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Global surface temperature estimates from NASA GISS.

The latest global temperature data are breaking records

You use the same altered and manufactured data Old Fraud uses..

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Consensus

AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)2

• 
  
  American Association for the Advancement of Science
  "The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (2006)3
  
  
• 
  
  American Chemical Society
  "Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem." (2004)4
  
  
• 
  
  American Geophysical Union
  "Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007, 2012, 2013)5
  
  
• 
  
  American Medical Association
  "Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant." (2013)6
  
  
• 
  
  American Meteorological Society
  "It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7
  
  
• 
  
  American Physical Society
  "The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (2007)8
  
  
• 
  
  The Geological Society of America
  "The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse‐gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s." (2006; revised 2010)9

SCIENCE ACADEMIES
International academies: Joint statement
"Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)." (2005, 11 international science academies)10

• 
  
  U.S. National Academy of Sciences
  "The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify taking steps to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere." (2005)11

U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

• 
  
  U.S. Global Change Research Program
  "The global warming of the past 50 years is due primarily to human-induced increases in heat-trapping gases. Human 'fingerprints' also have been identified in many other aspects of the climate system, including changes in ocean heat content, precipitation, atmospheric moisture, and Arctic sea ice." (2009, 13 U.S. government departments and agencies)12

INTERGOVERNMENTAL BODIES

• 
  
  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level.”13
  
  “Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely* due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.”14
  
  *IPCC defines ‘very likely’ as greater than 90 percent probability of occurrence.

OTHER RESOURCES
List of worldwide scientific organizations
The following page lists the nearly 200 worldwide scientific organizations that hold the position that climate change has been caused by human action.
Office of Planning and Research - List of Organizations



U.S. agencies
The following page contains information on what federal agencies are doing to adapt to climate change.
http://www.c2es.org/docUploads/federal-agencies-adaptation.pdf

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Global surface temperature estimates from NASA GISS.

The latest global temperature data are breaking records

You use the same altered and manufactured data Old Fraud uses..

LOL look at the list of Agencies in consensus with Me

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

Global surface temperature estimates from NASA GISS.

The latest global temperature data are breaking records

You use the same altered and manufactured data Old Fraud uses..

what are you posting goofy.....

 

[Billy_Bob]

Do ALL these scientists agree on what the MULTIPLIERS are? Nope. /QUOTE]
.

I am not into Gish Galloping with wing nuts sorry bro...ask your multipliers question when they are giving you the Nobel Prize ...any day now your absolute genius will be recognized..

So in other words, you are yet another partisan spinster with NO INTEREST in any aspect of the theory you support. Where DID those projections of 6 or 8 degC rise by 2100 come from? When were they made, and what are they TODAY... Fuck your oil company conspiracy theory. The Warmers have pretty much destroyed themselves with their exaggerated claims and screwing with open scientific process. Didn't NEED Exxon money to FAIL at VIRTUALLY EVERY PREDICTION they've made -- in just 3 decades. No more accurate than Nobel Prize winner Al Gore on the topic.. Smarter? Sure -- but they got on a gravy train of unlimited money for anything Global Warming and HAD to Exaggerate to make the sponsors happy..

You know your asking an idiot to provide facts and logic, dont you? He will not address the theroy he is spouting with any real facts or support his position with reasoned thought. Because the Consensus is now shown fraud in professional circles they are in all out attack mode. they can not allow the fact that most scientist do not believe in CAGW and its lies to get out.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Consensus

AMERICAN SCIENTIFIC SOCIETIES
Statement on climate change from 18 scientific associations
"Observations throughout the world make it clear that climate change is occurring, and rigorous scientific research demonstrates that the greenhouse gases emitted by human activities are the primary driver." (2009)2

• 
  
  American Association for the Advancement of Science
  "The scientific evidence is clear: global climate change caused by human activities is occurring now, and it is a growing threat to society." (2006)3
  
  
• 
  
  American Chemical Society
  "Comprehensive scientific assessments of our current and potential future climates clearly indicate that climate change is real, largely attributable to emissions from human activities, and potentially a very serious problem." (2004)4
  
  
• 
  
  American Geophysical Union
  "Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007, 2012, 2013)5
  
  
• 
  
  American Medical Association
  "Our AMA ... supports the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s fourth assessment report and concurs with the scientific consensus that the Earth is undergoing adverse global climate change and that anthropogenic contributions are significant." (2013)6
  
  
• 
  
  American Meteorological Society
  "It is clear from extensive scientific evidence that the dominant cause of the rapid change in climate of the past half century is human-induced increases in the amount of atmospheric greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), chlorofluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide." (2012)7
  
  
• 
  
  American Physical Society
  "The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earth’s physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now." (2007)8
  
  
• 
  
  The Geological Society of America
  "The Geological Society of America (GSA) concurs with assessments by the National Academies of Science (2005), the National Research Council (2006), and the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2007) that global climate has warmed and that human activities (mainly greenhouse‐gas emissions) account for most of the warming since the middle 1900s." (2006; revised 2010)9

SCIENCE ACADEMIES
International academies: Joint statement
"Climate change is real. There will always be uncertainty in understanding a system as complex as the world’s climate. However there is now strong evidence that significant global warming is occurring. The evidence comes from direct measurements of rising surface air temperatures and subsurface ocean temperatures and from phenomena such as increases in average global sea levels, retreating glaciers, and changes to many physical and biological systems. It is likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activities (IPCC 2001)." (2005, 11 international science academies)10

• 
  
  U.S. National Academy of Sciences
  "The scientific understanding of climate change is now sufficiently clear to justify taking steps to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere." (2005)11

U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES

• 
  
  U.S. Global Change Research Program
  "The global warming of the past 50 years is due primarily to human-induced increases in heat-trapping gases. Human 'fingerprints' also have been identified in many other aspects of the climate system, including changes in ocean heat content, precipitation, atmospheric moisture, and Arctic sea ice." (2009, 13 U.S. government departments and agencies)12

INTERGOVERNMENTAL BODIES

• 
  
  Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
  “Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as is now evident from observations of increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level.”13
  
  “Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely* due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.”14
  
  *IPCC defines ‘very likely’ as greater than 90 percent probability of occurrence.

OTHER RESOURCES
List of worldwide scientific organizations
The following page lists the nearly 200 worldwide scientific organizations that hold the position that climate change has been caused by human action.
Office of Planning and Research - List of Organizations



U.S. agencies
The following page contains information on what federal agencies are doing to adapt to climate change.
http://www.c2es.org/docUploads/federal-agencies-adaptation.pdf

NIce cut and paste.

Every one of those organizations have a very small group of POLITICIANS in charge of them and they NEVER get the information form those they purport to represent about what it is they actually believe. In other words your appeal to authority is BULL SHIT!

The AGU is a prime example of the "controlling body" being out of touch with reality and those whom they represent.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

The AGU is a prime example of the "controlling body" being out of touch with reality and those whom they represent.

Your appeal to the stupid and to the Ignorant is pathetic but very very much part of the Right wing mind set....

 

[flacaltenn]

As you can not refute his science with logic and cognitive thought why dont you go play with yourself..

Pull yourself together man you are hysterical...

Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Consensus

Temperature data from four international science institutions. All show rapid warming in the past few decades and that the last decade has been the warmest on record.

Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals1show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position. The following is a partial list of these organizations, along with links to their published statements and a selection of related resources.

The period from 1920 to 1940 was FOR THEM -- "also the warmest on record" It's ludicrous to compare our modern instrumented records to what we know of the past 1000s of years. Because THOSE studies are incapable of recording a 50 or 60 year spike like we're seeing now.. The public has been fed the exaggerated Sesame Street version of what's happened in Climate Science over the past 30 years or so.

The scientific orgs issuing those public statements never polled their membership or put the issue up for discussion. These are front office statements akin to the impact of a HallMark card. In the few instances where these statements HAVE been opened up to the membership -- it gets so contentious -- that no NEW statements are released.

 

[emilynghiem]

From the link........

Giaever said his climate research was eye opening. “I was horrified by what I found” after researching the issue in 2012, he noted.

“Global warming really has become a new religion. Because you cannot discuss it. It’s not proper. It is like the Catholic Church.”

The same way God is faith based, can neither be proven nor disproven but always requiring faith;
And the same way both Evolution and Creation require faith because none of us was there to
witness the Big Bang or any other stages either, so that is faith based and never fully proven or disproven;
why isn't it clear, by just the logic alone, that belief or disbelief in "Global Warming" is faith based,
and can never be fully proven or disproven. Thus, if we cannot depend on this to be established or
agreed upon, as either true false proven or disproven, it makes sense NOT to depend on it and
to operate so effectively that we AGREE what is ethical, sustainable, and in best interests of the greater
good WITHOUT relying on any conditions that "Global Warming" "God" "Creation/Evolution" is true or false.

We should act independent of these, and figure out where we agree on the best solutions and actions anyway!
Why impose a faith-based condition that isn't going to be met or resolved.

You might as well judge people by whether or not they believe in Jesus, which is faith based also.
If that is a free choice, to interpret Christ Jesus as True Justice, the so should Global Warming or any other faith-based concept be recognized as such, and up to the free will and choice of people without fear of insult or attack.