Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,072
- 1,130
- Thread starter
- #41
"I know the discussions can be tense and decisions are difficult and I know how angry some people are about the predicament they've been put in by big nations that have benefited from industrialization for a long period of time," Kerry saidThe following is a quote from Kerry, is it just me or does this not make a lick of sense?
"The Paris pact, he added, would not be "the silver bullet that eliminates this threat but I think everyone here can agree that we certainly won't eliminate it without an agreement," added Kerry."
So, will the agreement solve a problem or not? If not then why bother at all?
Maybe I am just being a conspriacy theory nut but it seems to me that the whole goal is control over all of the world's economy. Also it is being used to bring America down and third world countries up to some sort of standard the left wing has set.
No time to quarrel Kerry warns of climate tragedy - Yahoo News
The developed nations who are responsible for most of the problem are asking the undeveloped nations to make the big cuts while they do practically nothing. And Kerry questions why they are pissed?
America is doing nothing? Shutting our industrial base under Obama is nothing?
This graph seems to indicate by plan or not we are doing something: