protectionist
Diamond Member
- Oct 20, 2013
- 57,810
- 18,732
- 2,250
- Thread starter
- #81
First you were first talking about my quotation of another threads title, and attributing it to me. Now, you are mentioning another sentence in the OP, which yes of course I take responsibility for it, 100%. I think I can speak for theDum dum, those weren't MY words. They were a quotation of the title of a USMB OP from about a year ago. Try reading the OP before you post.Get that? Here's one guy, speaking for all Republicans. Wonder if he was "elected".
ROLL TAPE.
I'm now answering that by saying No, Republicans don't believe Muslims should be allowed to serve in public office, elected or not. Furthermore, no American should be OK with Muslims serving in public office.
You took DIRECT responsibility for it. Were you lying then or are you lying now?
overwhelming majority of Republicans, and safely be accurate to say >>
Republicans don't believe Muslims should be allowed to serve in public office, elected or not.Only a fool or irresponsible ignoramus would willingly grant Muslims the power of government office, which is exactly what they need to fulfill their Koranic commanded missions to overthrow US society and replace it with an Islamic state.(as Obama's Muslim Brotherhood appointees are all sworn to do)
The process of settlement [of Islam in the United States] is a "Civilization-Jihadist" process with all that the word means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood in North America] must understand that all their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" their miserable house by their hands, and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated, and Allah's religion is made victorious over all religions."
Mohamed Akram, "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America" May 22, 1991, Government Exhibit 003-0085, United States vs. Holy Land Foundation, et al. 7 (21).
Last edited: