Mueller can say anything but there is no proof or evidence of any wrongdoing. Yeah, I read it and there is no proof of anything.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
"No collusion......No obstruction......Completely cleared"?????
- Thread starter nat4900
- Start date
Mueller can say anything but there is no proof or evidence of any wrongdoing. Yeah, I read it and there is no proof of anything.
Who woulda figured that many voters would be voting for an unindicted two felony candidate for the WH....someone who will probably be indicted and possibly arrest when he is out of office....
"HAVE YOU NO SHAME?"
No....I guess you don't....
Except, there are no felonies. It's your tds emotions running wild.
Who woulda figured that many voters would be voting for an unindicted two felony candidate for the WH....someone who will probably be indicted and possibly arrest when he is out of office....
"HAVE YOU NO SHAME?"
No....I guess you don't....
Except, there are no felonies. It's your tds emotions running wild.
Ten instances of Obstruction of Justice....all felonies....ALL OF THEM!
How do you know trump meets with putin and no one is there to take notes.So why did he say he did not exonerate him?The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....
So, the questions then arise as to...........
a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?
b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?
c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?
Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.
Lock him up! Lock him up!
No, there was no evidence. No, there was no collusion, no, there was no obstruction. Keep yearning and wringing those little fingers in desperation.
Read the 448 pages?
NO?
Mueller can say anything but there is no proof or evidence of any wrongdoing. Yeah, I read it and there is no proof of anything.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on hillary, not because of adoptions which is what they originally said it was about.
That’s like saying no proof oj killed Nicole and Ron.
How do you know trump meets with putin and no one is there to take notes.So why did he say he did not exonerate him?The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....
So, the questions then arise as to...........
a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?
b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?
c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?
Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.
Lock him up! Lock him up!
No, there was no evidence. No, there was no collusion, no, there was no obstruction. Keep yearning and wringing those little fingers in desperation.
Read the 448 pages?
NO?
Mueller can say anything but there is no proof or evidence of any wrongdoing. Yeah, I read it and there is no proof of anything.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on hillary, not because of adoptions which is what they originally said it was about.
That’s like saying no proof oj killed Nicole and Ron.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on Hillary,
That was awesome!!
What was the name of the Russian dossier on Hillary?
How is the Justice departments investigation on that going?How do you know trump meets with putin and no one is there to take notes.So why did he say he did not exonerate him?Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.
Lock him up! Lock him up!
No, there was no evidence. No, there was no collusion, no, there was no obstruction. Keep yearning and wringing those little fingers in desperation.
Read the 448 pages?
NO?
Mueller can say anything but there is no proof or evidence of any wrongdoing. Yeah, I read it and there is no proof of anything.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on hillary, not because of adoptions which is what they originally said it was about.
That’s like saying no proof oj killed Nicole and Ron.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on Hillary,
That was awesome!!
What was the name of the Russian dossier on Hillary?
How is the Justice departments investigation on that going?How do you know trump meets with putin and no one is there to take notes.So why did he say he did not exonerate him?No, there was no evidence. No, there was no collusion, no, there was no obstruction. Keep yearning and wringing those little fingers in desperation.
Read the 448 pages?
NO?
Mueller can say anything but there is no proof or evidence of any wrongdoing. Yeah, I read it and there is no proof of anything.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on hillary, not because of adoptions which is what they originally said it was about.
That’s like saying no proof oj killed Nicole and Ron.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on Hillary,
That was awesome!!
What was the name of the Russian dossier on Hillary?
Slowly.
I'm looking for results when Pence is sworn in for his 2nd term, January 2029.
You guys thought that back when newt was around. How did that work out?How is the Justice departments investigation on that going?How do you know trump meets with putin and no one is there to take notes.So why did he say he did not exonerate him?
Read the 448 pages?
NO?
Mueller can say anything but there is no proof or evidence of any wrongdoing. Yeah, I read it and there is no proof of anything.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on hillary, not because of adoptions which is what they originally said it was about.
That’s like saying no proof oj killed Nicole and Ron.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on Hillary,
That was awesome!!
What was the name of the Russian dossier on Hillary?
Slowly.
I'm looking for results when Pence is sworn in for his 2nd term, January 2029.
You guys thought that back when newt was around. How did that work out?How is the Justice departments investigation on that going?How do you know trump meets with putin and no one is there to take notes.Mueller can say anything but there is no proof or evidence of any wrongdoing. Yeah, I read it and there is no proof of anything.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on hillary, not because of adoptions which is what they originally said it was about.
That’s like saying no proof oj killed Nicole and Ron.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on Hillary,
That was awesome!!
What was the name of the Russian dossier on Hillary?
Slowly.
I'm looking for results when Pence is sworn in for his 2nd term, January 2029.
Hillary isn't President…..
was that when he was getting blown in his car by his mistress?You guys thought that back when newt was around. How did that work out?How is the Justice departments investigation on that going?How do you know trump meets with putin and no one is there to take notes.Mueller can say anything but there is no proof or evidence of any wrongdoing. Yeah, I read it and there is no proof of anything.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on hillary, not because of adoptions which is what they originally said it was about.
That’s like saying no proof oj killed Nicole and Ron.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on Hillary,
That was awesome!!
What was the name of the Russian dossier on Hillary?
Slowly.
I'm looking for results when Pence is sworn in for his 2nd term, January 2029.
leftwinger
Diamond Member
The Mules pathetic crippled brain dead performance explains clearly why the "report" is written as mostly gibberish. No facts, no conclusions. Just a lot of "may have" "appeared" "possibly" etc. any real judge would not tolerate an opinion piece in court. Phony Russian names may have hacked the DNC? You LW fruitcakes have found your leader, the Mule.
How do you know trump meets with putin and no one is there to take notes.So why did he say he did not exonerate him?The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....
So, the questions then arise as to...........
a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?
b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?
c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?
Even if Mueller’s testimony was a bit lifeless, his matter-of-fact, yes-or-no answers did provide some damning soundbites. No, the president was not exonerated. Yes, the Office of Legal Counsel decision about not indicting a sitting president prevented him from considering charges against Trump. Yes, Trump could be charged once he leaves office. Yes, the campaign accepted help from Russian affiliates. Yes, Trump associates tried to cover that up. Yes, Russia tried to influence the election for Trump. No, they haven’t stopped.
Lock him up! Lock him up!
No, there was no evidence. No, there was no collusion, no, there was no obstruction. Keep yearning and wringing those little fingers in desperation.
Read the 448 pages?
NO?
Mueller can say anything but there is no proof or evidence of any wrongdoing. Yeah, I read it and there is no proof of anything.
Trump and his crime family met with Russians because they had dirt on hillary, not because of adoptions which is what they originally said it was about.
That’s like saying no proof oj killed Nicole and Ron.
No, not at all. There is no actual proof. Just liberal dreams.
So you read the 448 pages?The Mules pathetic crippled brain dead performance explains clearly why the "report" is written as mostly gibberish. No facts, no conclusions. Just a lot of "may have" "appeared" "possibly" etc. any real judge would not tolerate an opinion piece in court. Phony Russian names may have hacked the DNC? You LW fruitcakes have found your leader, the Mule.
Seemed clear to me
The Mules pathetic crippled brain dead performance explains clearly why the "report" is written as mostly gibberish. No facts, no conclusions. Just a lot of "may have" "appeared" "possibly" etc. any real judge would not tolerate an opinion piece in court. Phony Russian names may have hacked the DNC? You LW fruitcakes have found your leader, the Mule.
I missed where you got your PhD from
No facts?
Did the Pres refuse to testify?
Yes
What more do you want?
skews13
Diamond Member
- Mar 18, 2017
- 9,433
- 11,856
- 2,265
The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....
So, the questions then arise as to...........
a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?
b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?
c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?
The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....
So, the questions then arise as to...........
a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?
b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?
c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?
The 1980s called, they want their foreign policy back....hehe hehe.
leftwinger
Diamond Member
The Mules pathetic crippled brain dead performance explains clearly why the "report" is written as mostly gibberish. No facts, no conclusions. Just a lot of "may have" "appeared" "possibly" etc. any real judge would not tolerate an opinion piece in court. Phony Russian names may have hacked the DNC? You LW fruitcakes have found your leader, the Mule.
I missed where you got your PhD from
No facts?
Did the Pres refuse to testify?
Yes
What more do you want?
Did the Pres refuse to testify?
Why would he? With 20 angry Criminal DEMS? He answered in writing. 2000 supenoa, 4million pages. 500 witness' Over, done, cleanest man in history.
Worry about Tax fraud, Minn rep Omar now. There is legal trouble.
Not for DJT.
Kilroy2
Gold Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 6,296
- 2,129
- 210
The mantra stated in the thread's title is from Trump himself............and, of course, from his lackeys and stooges like Barr, Don Jr., Conway, Hickabee-Sanders, Hannity, et al....
So, the questions then arise as to...........
a) WHY would Trump claim "executive privilege" in keeping Mueller from testifying?
b) Why would Trump claim "attorney-client privilege" in keeping McGahn from testifying before the House committee.......bearing in mind that McGahn NOT only has already testified before Mueller.....but McGahn is also long gone from the WH ....AND was the WH attorney and NOT Trump's personal one?
c) WHY would Trump claim that Don Jr. is being "harassed" when asked by a republican-led Senate committee to testify?
Because he lies and then denies and then tries to silence those who will not say nice thinks about him.
Well he should learn to say nice thing about others and then maybe they will say nice things about him
Executive privilege to keep negative stuff about Trump from being heard by the public is obstruction of justice as he hides behind executive privileged
Example McGahn has given statements to the Mueller and it is general public knowledge so why can'the go before congress and say the same thing that is know
Executive privilege is the power of the president of the United States and other members of the executive branch of the United States Government to resist certain subpoenas and other interventions by the legislative and judicial branches of government in pursuit of information or personnel relating to confidential communications that would impair governmental functions.
McGahn statements that Trump want him to fire Mueller is not confidential communications
Trump continue to abuse his power by denying the right of others to speak while he speaks all the time of how innocent he is
Similar threads
- Replies
- 29
- Views
- 692
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 546
- Views
- 8K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 29
- Replies
- 102
- Views
- 444
- Replies
- 28
- Views
- 109
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8052
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-