Ninth Circuit Judges Rule In Favor Of Bullies

[Clementine]

Yup. American flags are dangerous in schools, according to the judges. There are bullies who will threaten other students who display the flag, show any kind of American pride or wear patriotic apparel. Instead of putting the bullies in their place, we are suppose to just continue to humor them and let them run roughshod over our freedom of expression. So, the Mexican flag can fly and Cinco de Mayo will be celebrated each year, but don't try to show any love for America or you'll be suspended.

Tolerance must go both ways. If those who have allegiance to another country don't like American flags or our culture, it's up to them to change or leave. They are free to do as they will, but have no right to impose their will on the rest of us. The judges just ruled that anti-American assholes can force us to stop displaying American pride. Fuck them.

http://www.caintv.com/ninth-circuit-rules-american-f

 

[Plasmaball]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

The judges just ruled that anti-American assholes can force us to stop displaying American pride. Fuck them.

the judges ruled how they always rule in these cases you moron

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Simple solution.

School uniforms.

 

[Rikurzhen]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.

 

[Plasmaball]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.

tough shit. schools are not free speech zones, and thus you are subject to those "rules" the school wants to promote.
neat you are taking the nationalistic patriotism angle. That is just as dangerous as a religious zealot.

 

[Clementine]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.

Yup, being patriotic is considered offensive by the far lefties. They tolerate things from people who are hostile to us and I wonder how many left radicals share the hatred of America that many other enemies do.

In this case, the disruption comes from Hispanic students who dislike Americans and threaten to beat kids up if they wear patriotic clothing or display flags on their bicycles. It's the bullies that present the problem, yet the solution is designed to appease them. If this were the other way around and Hispanics wearing flag t-shirts were threatened, the bullying students would be sent to re-education classes to teach them about tolerance.

Instead of addressing the ones making these threats, the school officials chose to limit the freedom of expression for the American students. It's the same method the administration applies to radical Muslims. Don't get mad at them for making death threats, beheading people and plotting attacks, just stop upsetting them. It's insane.

Schools, like many liberal politicians, don't have the same rules for all students. Some are given preferential treatment. Hispanics are allowed to fly flags and celebrate Cinco de Mayo. the bias rules allows some students to enjoy freedoms denied to others.

At a college, some sorority members were in trouble because they had a Mexican themed party where they wore sombreros and ate tacos. They were accused of racism. Schools are following the liberal platform. Preach about equality and the U.S. being a melting pot, then favor some groups over others and keep people separated by blaming them for participating in various cultural activities. The message is that tacos and sombreros are a Mexican thing and you've no right to partake. Wouldn't want people sharing or getting along, so keep throwing around accusations of racism whenever someone steps out of line. Of course, the rules are different depending on the color of your skin, so it would be nice if they sent us all a list of rules for our race so we can dutifully obey.

Groups, like La Raza and other radicals, often have a hand in shit like this. Some believe that the Hispanics have more right to be here and, therefore, don't have to respect us and yet they can do what they want. Liberal politicians and judges are often sympathetic to them and will twist the laws to advance their beliefs.

 

[LoneLaugher]

There are people in this land who are big enough assholes that they can turn something as positive as pride for ones nation into a fucking passive aggressive lame cry for attention.

Thinking people can spot these assholes. When we do....we make it so they don't ruin it for the rest of us.

 

[Rikurzhen]

There are people in this land who are big enough assholes that they can turn something as positive as pride for ones nation into a fucking passive aggressive lame cry for attention.

Thinking people can spot these assholes. When we do....we make it so they don't ruin it for the rest of us.

You're a Tricky Dick. I see how you tried to pull one over on us.

 

[Plasmaball]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.

Yup, being patriotic is considered offensive by the far lefties. They tolerate things from people who are hostile to us and I wonder how many left radicals share the hatred of America that many other enemies do.

In this case, the disruption comes from Hispanic students who dislike Americans and threaten to beat kids up if they wear patriotic clothing or display flags on their bicycles. It's the bullies that present the problem, yet the solution is designed to appease them. If this were the other way around and Hispanics wearing flag t-shirts were threatened, the bullying students would be sent to re-education classes to teach them about tolerance.

Instead of addressing the ones making these threats, the school officials chose to limit the freedom of expression for the American students. It's the same method the administration applies to radical Muslims. Don't get mad at them for making death threats, beheading people and plotting attacks, just stop upsetting them. It's insane.

Schools, like many liberal politicians, don't have the same rules for all students. Some are given preferential treatment. Hispanics are allowed to fly flags and celebrate Cinco de Mayo. the bias rules allows some students to enjoy freedoms denied to others.

At a college, some sorority members were in trouble because they had a Mexican themed party where they wore sombreros and ate tacos. They were accused of racism. Schools are following the liberal platform. Preach about equality and the U.S. being a melting pot, then favor some groups over others and keep people separated by blaming them for participating in various cultural activities. The message is that tacos and sombreros are a Mexican thing and you've no right to partake. Wouldn't want people sharing or getting along, so keep throwing around accusations of racism whenever someone steps out of line. Of course, the rules are different depending on the color of your skin, so it would be nice if they sent us all a list of rules for our race so we can dutifully obey.

Groups, like La Raza and other radicals, often have a hand in shit like this. Some believe that the Hispanics have more right to be here and, therefore, don't have to respect us and yet they can do what they want. Liberal politicians and judges are often sympathetic to them and will twist the laws to advance their beliefs.

you have a serious problem with your bigotry towards muslims and anything non-white. You should have that checked out.

 

[Rikurzhen]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.

Yup, being patriotic is considered offensive by the far lefties. They tolerate things from people who are hostile to us and I wonder how many left radicals share the hatred of America that many other enemies do.

In this case, the disruption comes from Hispanic students who dislike Americans and threaten to beat kids up if they wear patriotic clothing or display flags on their bicycles. It's the bullies that present the problem, yet the solution is designed to appease them. If this were the other way around and Hispanics wearing flag t-shirts were threatened, the bullying students would be sent to re-education classes to teach them about tolerance.

Instead of addressing the ones making these threats, the school officials chose to limit the freedom of expression for the American students. It's the same method the administration applies to radical Muslims. Don't get mad at them for making death threats, beheading people and plotting attacks, just stop upsetting them. It's insane.

Schools, like many liberal politicians, don't have the same rules for all students. Some are given preferential treatment. Hispanics are allowed to fly flags and celebrate Cinco de Mayo. the bias rules allows some students to enjoy freedoms denied to others.

At a college, some sorority members were in trouble because they had a Mexican themed party where they wore sombreros and ate tacos. They were accused of racism. Schools are following the liberal platform. Preach about equality and the U.S. being a melting pot, then favor some groups over others and keep people separated by blaming them for participating in various cultural activities. The message is that tacos and sombreros are a Mexican thing and you've no right to partake. Wouldn't want people sharing or getting along, so keep throwing around accusations of racism whenever someone steps out of line. Of course, the rules are different depending on the color of your skin, so it would be nice if they sent us all a list of rules for our race so we can dutifully obey.

Groups, like La Raza and other radicals, often have a hand in shit like this. Some believe that the Hispanics have more right to be here and, therefore, don't have to respect us and yet they can do what they want. Liberal politicians and judges are often sympathetic to them and will twist the laws to advance their beliefs.

you have a serious problem with your bigotry towards muslims and anything non-white. You should have that checked out.

All noise and zero signal in your comment. You didn't add anything, not one thing, to the discussion. Is that because you're boxed in and can't rebut his points so you have to resort to name-calling?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.

When certain symbols are misused to celebrate patriotism in a away that is harmful to some of the citizens, yeah, the jingoists can be told to sit down and behave.

 

[Plasmaball]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.

Yup, being patriotic is considered offensive by the far lefties. They tolerate things from people who are hostile to us and I wonder how many left radicals share the hatred of America that many other enemies do.

In this case, the disruption comes from Hispanic students who dislike Americans and threaten to beat kids up if they wear patriotic clothing or display flags on their bicycles. It's the bullies that present the problem, yet the solution is designed to appease them. If this were the other way around and Hispanics wearing flag t-shirts were threatened, the bullying students would be sent to re-education classes to teach them about tolerance.

Instead of addressing the ones making these threats, the school officials chose to limit the freedom of expression for the American students. It's the same method the administration applies to radical Muslims. Don't get mad at them for making death threats, beheading people and plotting attacks, just stop upsetting them. It's insane.

Schools, like many liberal politicians, don't have the same rules for all students. Some are given preferential treatment. Hispanics are allowed to fly flags and celebrate Cinco de Mayo. the bias rules allows some students to enjoy freedoms denied to others.

At a college, some sorority members were in trouble because they had a Mexican themed party where they wore sombreros and ate tacos. They were accused of racism. Schools are following the liberal platform. Preach about equality and the U.S. being a melting pot, then favor some groups over others and keep people separated by blaming them for participating in various cultural activities. The message is that tacos and sombreros are a Mexican thing and you've no right to partake. Wouldn't want people sharing or getting along, so keep throwing around accusations of racism whenever someone steps out of line. Of course, the rules are different depending on the color of your skin, so it would be nice if they sent us all a list of rules for our race so we can dutifully obey.

Groups, like La Raza and other radicals, often have a hand in shit like this. Some believe that the Hispanics have more right to be here and, therefore, don't have to respect us and yet they can do what they want. Liberal politicians and judges are often sympathetic to them and will twist the laws to advance their beliefs.

you have a serious problem with your bigotry towards muslims and anything non-white. You should have that checked out.

All noise and zero signal in your comment. You didn't add anything, not one thing, to the discussion. Is that because you're boxed in and can't rebut his points so you have to resort to name-calling?

Clem is a female..far as i know, and i added plenty. All she is doing is professing the typical arguments from a bigoted moron. Patriotic with a mix of persecution and bigotry because she thinks everyone is out to get white loving americans.

One you actually understand this fact that schools are not freedom of speech zones you will understand their no argument for her to have period. Schools can enforce dress codes and case law supports me, not you.

 

[SmarterThanTheAverageBear]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.

When certain symbols are misused to celebrate patriotism in a away that is harmful to some of the citizens, yeah, the jingoists can be told to sit down and behave.

Of course the problem with that in THIS specific case is that the Mexican flag shirts were allowed. That's bullshit , no matter how you slice it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Case law does not support Clemmy. The Court is correct, and she is wrong.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.

When certain symbols are misused to celebrate patriotism in a away that is harmful to some of the citizens, yeah, the jingoists can be told to sit down and behave.

Of course the problem with that in THIS specific case is that the Mexican flag shirts were allowed. That's bullshit , no matter how you slice it.

Yes, that should not be allowed either if it disrupts the educational process. Equal treatment.

 

[alan1]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

The judges just ruled that anti-American assholes can force us to stop displaying American pride. Fuck them.

the judges ruled how they always rule in these cases you moron

Good point.
No more gay rallies at school.

 

[Rikurzhen]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

You fundamentally misunderstand the issue, as did the judges. When expression of love for one's country is speech that is deemed controversial on school property, then elevating an orderly environment over a patriotic culture is the wrong way to go. Some speech on school grounds can be disorderly and it's right to restrict that speech in order to defuse tensions and return to educating the children. Celebrating one's patriotism SHOULD never be considered disruptive speech. If disruption does arise, then the school needs to address and correct the students who find such speech offensive and make this corrective action a lesson for all other students. Patriotism is a higher value than an orderly school environment. That's where the 9th erred - they're liberals and their values are all screwed up.

Yup, being patriotic is considered offensive by the far lefties. They tolerate things from people who are hostile to us and I wonder how many left radicals share the hatred of America that many other enemies do.

In this case, the disruption comes from Hispanic students who dislike Americans and threaten to beat kids up if they wear patriotic clothing or display flags on their bicycles. It's the bullies that present the problem, yet the solution is designed to appease them. If this were the other way around and Hispanics wearing flag t-shirts were threatened, the bullying students would be sent to re-education classes to teach them about tolerance.

Instead of addressing the ones making these threats, the school officials chose to limit the freedom of expression for the American students. It's the same method the administration applies to radical Muslims. Don't get mad at them for making death threats, beheading people and plotting attacks, just stop upsetting them. It's insane.

Schools, like many liberal politicians, don't have the same rules for all students. Some are given preferential treatment. Hispanics are allowed to fly flags and celebrate Cinco de Mayo. the bias rules allows some students to enjoy freedoms denied to others.

At a college, some sorority members were in trouble because they had a Mexican themed party where they wore sombreros and ate tacos. They were accused of racism. Schools are following the liberal platform. Preach about equality and the U.S. being a melting pot, then favor some groups over others and keep people separated by blaming them for participating in various cultural activities. The message is that tacos and sombreros are a Mexican thing and you've no right to partake. Wouldn't want people sharing or getting along, so keep throwing around accusations of racism whenever someone steps out of line. Of course, the rules are different depending on the color of your skin, so it would be nice if they sent us all a list of rules for our race so we can dutifully obey.

Groups, like La Raza and other radicals, often have a hand in shit like this. Some believe that the Hispanics have more right to be here and, therefore, don't have to respect us and yet they can do what they want. Liberal politicians and judges are often sympathetic to them and will twist the laws to advance their beliefs.

you have a serious problem with your bigotry towards muslims and anything non-white. You should have that checked out.

All noise and zero signal in your comment. You didn't add anything, not one thing, to the discussion. Is that because you're boxed in and can't rebut his points so you have to resort to name-calling?

Clem is a female..far as i know, and i added plenty. All she is doing is professing the typical arguments from a bigoted moron. Patriotic with a mix of persecution and bigotry because she thinks everyone is out to get white loving americans.

One you actually understand this fact that schools are not freedom of speech zones you will understand their no argument for her to have period. Schools can enforce dress codes and case law supports me, not you.

Let's review the facts:

At least one party to this appeal, student M.D., wore American flag clothing to school on Cinco de Mayo 2009. M.D. was approached by a male student who, in the words of the district court, “shoved a Mexican flag at him and said something in Spanish expressing anger at [M.D.’s] clothing.

In the aftermath of the students’ departure from school, they received numerous threats from other students. D.G. was threatened by text message on May 6, and the same afternoon, received a threatening phone call from a caller saying he was outside of D.G.’s home. D.M. and M.D. were likewise threatened with violence, and a student at Live Oak overheard a group of classmates saying that some gang members would come down from San Jose to “take care of” the students. Because of these threats, the students did not go to school on May 7.

We hold that school officials, namely Rodriguez, did not act unconstitutionally, under either the First Amendment or Article I, § 2(a) of the California Constitution, in asking students to turn their shirts inside out, remove them, or leave school for the day with an excused absence in order to prevent substantial disruption or violence at school.
​

Threat of violence from a Mexican-American, who is celebrating a Mexican holiday, to an American-American who is wearing a symbol of America.

The wrong-doing all emanates from Mexican-Americans with misplaced loyalties. The wrong-doing extends to threats of violence against American-Americans for the insult of wearing an American flag symbol on their clothes.

What the principal and the Courts have done is granted power to the Heckler's veto. Bowing to pressure from Heckler's reduces freedom of speech to the lowest common denominator.

The problem here was not American-American students wearing shirts with the American flag emblazoned upon them, it was Mexican-American student taking offense and celebrating a Mexican Army victory over French forces IN MEXICO 150 years ago.

In terms of precedence, this is how matters should have fallen out:

1.) Expression of patriotism during unstructured school time takes precedence over an orderly school environment.
2.) Violence shall be punished before non-violence.
3.) American patriotism takes precedence over Mexican patriotism.

Allowing Hecker's Veto to be rewarded and allowing Mexican flags while disallowing American flags on the campus of a school in America is a fucking retarded judicial philosophy.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

The judges just ruled that anti-American assholes can force us to stop displaying American pride. Fuck them.

the judges ruled how they always rule in these cases you moron

Good point.
No more gay rallies at school.

Were the gays waving huge flags, wearing inappropriate clothing or insignia, or trying to french kiss straight kids?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Rik, cultural McCarthyism is dying, and your voice is shrill and ineffective.

 

[alan1]

Ninth Circuit Court Won 8217 t Reconsider U.S. Flag Shirt Ban At California School CBS Sacramento

so people can skip the retard link the Op provided.

A unanimous three-judge panel in February said past problems gave school officials sufficient and justifiable reasons for their actions. The court said schools have wide latitude in curbing certain civil rights to ensure campus safety.

Schools are not freedom of speech bastions.

The judges just ruled that anti-American assholes can force us to stop displaying American pride. Fuck them.

the judges ruled how they always rule in these cases you moron

Good point.
No more gay rallies at school.

Were the gays waving huge flags, wearing inappropriate clothing or insignia, or trying to french kiss straight kids?

Last I looked, none of those things were required for it to be called a rally.