otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 34,628
- 11,082
- 1,315
So, the research at the Wuhan lab didn't add a mutation to the virus, then no GoF.Virus's mutate naturally, especially when engineered to do so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So, the research at the Wuhan lab didn't add a mutation to the virus, then no GoF.Virus's mutate naturally, especially when engineered to do so.
You can’t prove either way, though unlike yourself, intelligent people will realize that GOF was going on anyway because the end goal was including the military in vaccinations. Your next problem will be to learn more about mutations both in the lab and before the viruses go into the lab.So, the research at the Wuhan lab didn't add a mutation to the virus, then no GoF.
who cares? fauci said NO GoF period. now that he's a proven liar, all those trying to force their views on others are looking for a loophole.Did the research that you’re claiming as GoF add a mutation to the virus?
Interesting timing to be selecting a new head of the NIH…. One article question whether or not that individual would need a science degree lol or something to that effect. They are more concerned about a person who will gain positive publicity and promote the information to the public, except it wasn’t in those words of course. More than one article stated that they’re interested in an individual who can work with donors. Of course!This is why Free Speech of dissenting opinion is allowed....
When everyone in the administration was saying something different...there were a ton of people (boots on the ground) who were all saying the truth.
All the social media giants were busy silencing the truth tellers (as well as a bunch of nonsense of conspiracy theorists) as directed by our Government. Which is the exact thing SCOTUS already had said for them not to do.
This is fascism pure and simple.
All of them need to go....clean sweep of the swamp in DC.
Interesting timing to be selecting a new head of the NIH…. One article question whether or not that individual would need a science degree lol or something to that effect. They are more concerned about a person who will gain positive publicity and promote the information to the public, except it wasn’t in those words of course. More than one article stated that they’re interested in an individual who can work with donors. Of course!
“That is in addition to the core role: securing the agency’s budget, and being ever-more creative in making the case for supporting basic research.”
Personally, I like that “being ever-more creative” part to sell their wares to the public.
COVID, racism, China: three tests for the next NIH leader
The successor to Francis Collins will need to be steadfast, nimble and creative in how they run the world’s largest biomedical research agency at a pivotal time.www.nature.com
Really, then why was Trump the president clueless?
So, the research at the Wuhan lab didn't add a mutation to the virus, then no GoF.
Is that what is going on here? I've never heard of national review.comOh, another supposedly gotcha thread by the wingnut white privilege conservative on Doctor Fauci.
Mac is just happy that the body count helped remove bad orange man from office. Like all good USMB StalininisTs, he didn't care how it happened, only that it happened."congressman paul, you have no idea what you are talking about"
And BOOOOM goes the dynamite.
Remember when fauxi said that to rand? I remember self righteous political cultists like Mac1958 praising fauxi for fighting back.
What now, bitches?
He should be charged with 4 million counts of murder.NIH Admits to Funding Gain-of-Function Research in Wuhan,
Says EcoHealth Violated Reporting Requirements
A top NIH official admitted in a Wednesday letter that U.S. taxpayers funded gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses in Wuhan and revealed that EcoHealth Alliance, the U.S. non-profit that funneled NIH money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was not transparent about the work it was doing.
In the letter to Republican Representative James Comer, Lawrence A. Tabak of the NIH cites a “limited experiment” that was conducted to test if “spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.” The laboratory mice infected with the modified bat virus “became sicker” than those infected with the unmodified bat virus.
The revelation vindicates Republican Senator Rand Paul, who got into heated exchanges with National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Director Dr. Fauci during his May and July testimonials before Congress over the gain-of-function question. At the second hearing, Paul accused Fauci of misleading Congress by denying that the U.S. had funded gain-of-function projects at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Dr. Richard Ebright, biosafety expert and professor of chemistry and chemical biology at Rutgers University, had previously rebutted Fauci’s claim that the NIH “has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology [WIV]” as “demonstrably false.”
In addition to his admission that gain-of-function research was being conducted with NIH money, Tabak also revealed that EcoHealth failed to comply with its reporting responsibilities under the grant. EcoHealth was required to submit to a “secondary review” in the event of certain developments that might increase the danger associated with the research. So, when Wuhan researchers successfully bound a natural bat coronavirus to a human AC2 receptor in mice, they were supposed to inform the NIH, but they didn’t.
NIH Admits to Funding Gain-of-Function Research in Wuhan, Says EcoHealth Violated Reporting Requirements | National Review
The admission contradicts Dr. Fauci’s sworn testimony.www.nationalreview.com
Fauci should be charged with Felony Perjury, fired at a minimum.
Can’t prove either way? No soYou can’t prove either way, though unlike yourself, intelligent people will realize that GOF was going on anyway because the end goal was including the military in vaccinations. Your next problem will be to learn more about mutations both in the lab and before the viruses go into the lab.
Fibbing Fauci strikes again.The CCP changed DNA of animals to be more human-like....
Gee, why would the CCP do such a thing unless they wanted to see if the virus they were working with / mutating / manipulating ... dare I say EXPERIMENTING WITH would affect humans....
The CCP reportedly stated they had no idea they would get the results they ended up with...
NO SHIT....that's why it's called 'EXPERIMENTING'..
So they used NIH funding to test how gene / viral modified viruses would affect their himan-like subject they created to be lore like testing on people rather than just lab animals....
And snowglakes....and Fauci....are trying to argue this was somehow NOT gain of function testing?!
Remember, Fauci is the guy who swore under oath that NO ONE had suggested to him that there were indications COVID-19 came from a lab.....and when his own e-mails were read, including one from a leading virologist that spelled out / provided the I dictionary showing it most probably came from a lab, PROVING FAUVI HAD COMMITTED PERJURY, Fauci declared that the e-mail rely did not count because BECAUSE HE DECIDED THE E-MAIL FROM ONE OF THE TOP VIROLOGISTS ON THE PLANET EXPLAINING HOW THE WUHAN VIRUS CAME FROM A LAB WAS TOO LONG TO READ.
BULLSHIT!
And the link to this bullshit can be found where?The CCP changed DNA of animals to be more human-like....
Gee, why would the CCP do such a thing unless they wanted to see if the virus they were working with / mutating / manipulating ... dare I say EXPERIMENTING WITH would affect humans....
The CCP reportedly stated they had no idea they would get the results they ended up with...
NO SHIT....that's why it's called 'EXPERIMENTING'..
So they used NIH funding to test how gene / viral modified viruses would affect their himan-like subject they created to be lore like testing on people rather than just lab animals....
And snowglakes....and Fauci....are trying to argue this was somehow NOT gain of function testing?!
Remember, Fauci is the guy who swore under oath that NO ONE had suggested to him that there were indications COVID-19 came from a lab.....and when his own e-mails were read, including one from a leading virologist that spelled out / provided the I dictionary showing it most probably came from a lab, PROVING FAUVI HAD COMMITTED PERJURY, Fauci declared that the e-mail rely did not count because BECAUSE HE DECIDED THE E-MAIL FROM ONE OF THE TOP VIROLOGISTS ON THE PLANET EXPLAINING HOW THE WUHAN VIRUS CAME FROM A LAB WAS TOO LONG TO READ.
BULLSHIT!
Bark for us again…Fibbing Fauci strikes again.
A huge trial just like the one during WW2 in Nuremberg should be the order of the day. Also a world get together is in order to ban any type of "gain of function" practice or study ever again. This type of thing that took place is just as bad as the use of chemical warfare was during world war one and two. That appalled the world so badly, that it created strict law's that prohibit such atrocious acts in the future without having stern consequences if violated.NIH Admits to Funding Gain-of-Function Research in Wuhan,
Says EcoHealth Violated Reporting Requirements
A top NIH official admitted in a Wednesday letter that U.S. taxpayers funded gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses in Wuhan and revealed that EcoHealth Alliance, the U.S. non-profit that funneled NIH money to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, was not transparent about the work it was doing.
In the letter to Republican Representative James Comer, Lawrence A. Tabak of the NIH cites a “limited experiment” that was conducted to test if “spike proteins from naturally occurring bat coronaviruses circulating in China were capable of binding to the human ACE2 receptor in a mouse model.” The laboratory mice infected with the modified bat virus “became sicker” than those infected with the unmodified bat virus.
The revelation vindicates Republican Senator Rand Paul, who got into heated exchanges with National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Director Dr. Fauci during his May and July testimonials before Congress over the gain-of-function question. At the second hearing, Paul accused Fauci of misleading Congress by denying that the U.S. had funded gain-of-function projects at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Dr. Richard Ebright, biosafety expert and professor of chemistry and chemical biology at Rutgers University, had previously rebutted Fauci’s claim that the NIH “has not ever and does not now fund gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology [WIV]” as “demonstrably false.”
In addition to his admission that gain-of-function research was being conducted with NIH money, Tabak also revealed that EcoHealth failed to comply with its reporting responsibilities under the grant. EcoHealth was required to submit to a “secondary review” in the event of certain developments that might increase the danger associated with the research. So, when Wuhan researchers successfully bound a natural bat coronavirus to a human AC2 receptor in mice, they were supposed to inform the NIH, but they didn’t.
NIH Admits to Funding Gain-of-Function Research in Wuhan, Says EcoHealth Violated Reporting Requirements | National Review
The admission contradicts Dr. Fauci’s sworn testimony.www.nationalreview.com
Fauci should be charged with Felony Perjury, fired at a minimum.
Can you only think in links? Someone telling you what to think?And the link to this bullshit can be found where?
Sure, since3 it obvious that you don't understand the written word except that of the masters who own you.Bark for us again…