New supercomputer technology to improve speed exponentially

Bill Clinton only opened communications and worked to set up distribution points.


Really?...


this is a long article so heres is a couple of Paragraphs.. Read the whole thing and learn something...Some of you people kill me:eusa_eh:



On Jan. 26, 1995, approximately 52 seconds into flight, a Chinese LM-2E carrying the Hughes APSTAR II communications satellite failed. This was the LM-2E's second failure. The first failure of the LM-2E in December 1992 involved an attempted launch of the Hughes OPTUS B-2 commercial communications satellite.

"Respondents decided to form and direct a launch failure investigation beginning in January 1995 and continuing throughout much of that year. The investigation involved the formation of several groups of leading technical experts from China and the U.S., which throughout the investigation engaged in an extensive exchange of technical data and analysis, producing a wide range of unauthorized technology transfers," noted the State Department charge document.


Clinton Overrules Secretary of State

The alleged improper export by Hughes of satellite technology was cited as a key reason when Clinton's secretary of state, Warren Christopher, rejected a plan to give the Commerce Department full authority to control satellite exports.

According to a Sept. 22, 1995, memorandum, Christopher rejected plans to give Commerce the authority to approve satellite exports after an interagency study noted that "significant" military and intelligence capabilities could be lost.

The memorandum stated the Pentagon and U.S. intelligence agencies strongly opposed the policy change because Hughes exported two satellites with sensitive cryptographic technology without first getting a State Department munitions license. Cryptographic technology is used to scramble communications sent to satellites to prevent unauthorized access.

President Clinton, who transferred the power to regulate sensitive satellites to Commerce, under Commerce Secretary Ron Brown, ultimately overruled Christopher.

Clinton's transfer allowed the Chinese army to acquire advanced U.S. technology for military purposes. Hughes satellites currently provide the Chinese army with secure communications that are invulnerable to earth combat and highly accurate all-weather navigation for strike bombers and missiles.
Clinton Legacy – A New Arms Race

The satellite and missile technology obtained from Hughes by the Chinese army is critical for the design and manufacture of missile nose cones and electronic missile control systems. The technology clearly helped the Chinese army field a new generation of ICBMS, including the Dong Feng 31 missile, which can drop three nuclear warheads on any city in the U.S.

The success of Shen is a story of missiles, politics and greed. Gen. Shen succeeded in using Hughes and President Clinton as valuable tools to obtain weapons that are now pointed at the United States.






Clinton and Chinese Missiles

FROM YOUR ARTICLE:

Chinese Army Gets U.S. Missile Technology for Money

A newly released document from the U.S. State Department reveals that the most successful Chinese espionage operation in recent history occurred during the Clinton administration.

The document accuses Hughes Space and Communications Company of violating U.S. national security 123 times by knowingly sending detailed missile and space technology directly to the Chinese army.

----------------------------------------

They don't need espionage now. Republicans have been moving that technology to China to make a buck. Was that the point to your article? I would think you would be embarrassed.

or Loral launching in a Chinese rocket? :lol:
 
There are no women for Chinese men, they'll have to leave the country to find them. It's no secret, No conspiracy, it Chinese Law



China's One Child Policy
One Child Policy in China Designed to Limit Population Growth



Jun 14 2010
China has proclaimed that it will continue its one child policy, which limits couples to having one child, through the 2006-2010 five year planning period.
China's one child policy was established by Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping in 1979 to limit communist China's population growth. Although designated a "temporary measure," it continues a quarter-century after its establishment. The policy limits couples to one child. Fines, pressures to abort a pregnancy, and even forced sterilization accompanied second or subsequent pregnancies.

It is not an all-encompassing rule because it has always been restricted to ethnic Han Chinese living in urban areas. Citizens living in rural areas and minorities living in China are not subject to the law. However, the rule has been estimated to have reduced population growth in the country of 1.3 billion by as much as 300 million people over its first twenty years.

This rule has caused a disdain for female infants; abortion, neglect, abandonment, and even infanticide have been known to occur to female infants. The result of such Draconian family planning has resulted in the disparate ratio of 114 males for every 100 females among babies from birth through children four years of age. Normally, 105 males are naturally born for every 100 females.


Recent Effects of the One Child Law
Now that millions of sibling-less people in China are now young adults in or nearing their child-bearing years, a special provision allows millions of couples to have two children legally. If a couple is composed of two people without siblings, then they may have two children of their own, thus preventing too dramatic of a population decrease.
Although IUDs, sterilization, and abortion (legal in China) are China's most popular forms of birth control, over the past few years, China has provided more education and support for alternative birth control methods.

China One Child Policy - Overview of the One Child Policy in China

Which might explain why they modified the policy.

Just saying.

One-child policy in China will not be relaxed

One-child policy: The China Daily newspaper on Monday quoted the head of the National Population and Family Planning Commission as saying there were no plans to change the policy anytime soon.

One-child policy in China will not be relaxed - CSMonitor.com

------------------------------------------------

Prove the policy was modified.

Just saying.

Modified when?

One-child policy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
There are no women for Chinese men, they'll have to leave the country to find them. It's no secret, No conspiracy, it Chinese Law



China's One Child Policy
One Child Policy in China Designed to Limit Population Growth



Jun 14 2010
China has proclaimed that it will continue its one child policy, which limits couples to having one child, through the 2006-2010 five year planning period.
China's one child policy was established by Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping in 1979 to limit communist China's population growth. Although designated a "temporary measure," it continues a quarter-century after its establishment. The policy limits couples to one child. Fines, pressures to abort a pregnancy, and even forced sterilization accompanied second or subsequent pregnancies.

It is not an all-encompassing rule because it has always been restricted to ethnic Han Chinese living in urban areas. Citizens living in rural areas and minorities living in China are not subject to the law. However, the rule has been estimated to have reduced population growth in the country of 1.3 billion by as much as 300 million people over its first twenty years.

This rule has caused a disdain for female infants; abortion, neglect, abandonment, and even infanticide have been known to occur to female infants. The result of such Draconian family planning has resulted in the disparate ratio of 114 males for every 100 females among babies from birth through children four years of age. Normally, 105 males are naturally born for every 100 females.


Recent Effects of the One Child Law
Now that millions of sibling-less people in China are now young adults in or nearing their child-bearing years, a special provision allows millions of couples to have two children legally. If a couple is composed of two people without siblings, then they may have two children of their own, thus preventing too dramatic of a population decrease.
Although IUDs, sterilization, and abortion (legal in China) are China's most popular forms of birth control, over the past few years, China has provided more education and support for alternative birth control methods.

China One Child Policy - Overview of the One Child Policy in China

Which might explain why they modified the policy.

Just saying.

If a couple is composed of two people without siblings, then they may have two children of their own, thus preventing too dramatic of a population decrease.

Yea, that's really going to make a difference. A real policy changer.

You admit it was modified from its initial goal of applying to everyone equally then?
 
[They don't need espionage now. Republicans have been moving that technology to China to make a buck. Was that the point to your article? I would think you would be embarrassed.

Nope... this was the piont idiot..

President Clinton, who transferred the power to regulate sensitive satellites to Commerce, under Commerce Secretary Ron Brown, ultimately overruled Christopher

Clinton's transfer allowed the Chinese army to acquire advanced U.S. technology for military purposes. Hughes satellites currently provide the Chinese army with secure communications that are invulnerable to earth combat and highly accurate all-weather navigation for strike bombers and missiles.

The success of Shen is a story of missiles, politics and greed. Gen. Shen succeeded in using Hughes and President Clinton as valuable tools to obtain weapons that are now pointed at the United States.

China won and the U.S. lost what may very well be the first round of World War III. Gen. Shen led that victory and he did it with a checkbook. The Clinton legacy for the 21st century is a new arms race.


these people should have been prosecuted not helped. This tech transfer was illeagal no matter who does it. Just pointed out you're boy Clinton would do anything for a contribution and also that you're an idiot and don't know what you're talking about, nothing new with you libs
 
Last edited:
Prove the policy was modified.

Just saying.


You got to love it:eusa_whistle: Defending of government telling you how many kids you can have, Congradulations!! :clap2:

Given the population and amount of arable land in China, that is exactly what a responsible government of any kind would do in that situation. Any sudden change in rainfall patterns or temperatures, such as we experianced after Tambora, 1815, or Krakatoa, 1883, blew up, will cause the deaths from starvation of a substancial percentage of the population.

I really find it difficult to understand why Conservatives prefer the deaths of millions of people, rather than a responsible approach to population.
 
Given the population and amount of arable land in China, that is exactly what a responsible government of any kind would do in that situation. Any sudden change in rainfall patterns or temperatures, such as we experianced after Tambora, 1815, or Krakatoa, 1883, blew up, will cause the deaths from starvation of a substancial percentage of the population.

I really find it difficult to understand why Conservatives prefer the deaths of millions of people, rather than a responsible approach to population.

Humm... It doen't look like they are worried much about thier water

20091020luguang01.jpg


Chemical waste from Jiangsu Taixing Chemical Industrial District dumped on top of the Yangtze River bank. May 15, 2009

20091020luguang02.jpg



Henan Anyang iron and steel plant’s sewage flowed into Anyang River. March 25, 2008

20091020luguang05.jpg


Guiyu, Guangdong province, rivers and reservoirs have been contaminated, the villager is washing in a seriously polluted pond. November 25, 2005

20091020luguang06.jpg



In the Yellow Sea coastline, countless sewage pipes buried in the beach and even extending into the deep sea. April 28, 2008

20091020luguang08.jpg



In Ma’anshan, Anhui province along the Yangtze River there are many small-scaled Iron selection factories and plastic processing plants. Large amounts of sewage discharged into the Yangtze River June 18, 2009


20091020luguang09.jpg


In Inner Mongolia there were 2 “black dragons” from the Lasengmiao Power Plant covering the nearby villages. July 26, 2005

20091020luguang10.jpg


Jiangsu province Changshu City Fluorine Chemical industry land sewage treatment plant was responsible for collection and processing of the industrial sewage. However they did not, the sewage pipe was extended 1500 meters under the Yangtze River and releasing the sewage there. 2009 June 11


20091020luguang11.jpg


Soil by Yangtze River, was polluted by Anhui Province Ma’anshan Chemical Industrial DistrictJune 26, 2009

20091020luguang12.jpg


A Large amount of the chemical wastewater discharged into Yangtze River from Zhenjiang Titanium mill every day. Less than 1,000 meters away downstream is where the water department of Danyang City gets its water from. June 10, 2009


20091020luguang14.jpg


Anhui Province Cihu Chemical Industry District built a underground pipe to discharge wastewater into the Yangtze River. The wastewater sometimes is black, gray, dark red, or yellow, wastewater from different chemical factories has different colors. June 18, 2009

20091020luguang20.jpg



Hebei Province Shexian Tianjin Iron and steel plant is a heavily polluting company. Company scale is still growing, seriously affecting the lives of local residents. March 18, 2008

20091020luguang16.jpg
 
Last edited:
You read what the Chinese are trying to do in the realms of engineering and education, it makes you weep.

US School math, computing, engineering and related schools are mostly turning out foreign students. US students can't be bothered. The halls and cafeteria of the school I go to are full of varios shades reading texts on calculus, trigonometry, electrical engineering etc. All the palefaces are playing farm ville or Mafia wars.
:eusa_hand: dont confuse whitey with america. the US has a knack for inviting 'varios shades' to become american.
 
You read what the Chinese are trying to do in the realms of engineering and education, it makes you weep.

US School math, computing, engineering and related schools are mostly turning out foreign students. US students can't be bothered. The halls and cafeteria of the school I go to are full of varios shades reading texts on calculus, trigonometry, electrical engineering etc. All the palefaces are playing farm ville or Mafia wars.
:eusa_hand: dont confuse whitey with america. the US has a knack for inviting 'varios shades' to become american.

Look at the Confederate Republican Party. "Whitey isn't as smart as they think they are".

Irreducible complexity anyone?
 
Given the population and amount of arable land in China, that is exactly what a responsible government of any kind would do in that situation. Any sudden change in rainfall patterns or temperatures, such as we experianced after Tambora, 1815, or Krakatoa, 1883, blew up, will cause the deaths from starvation of a substancial percentage of the population.

I really find it difficult to understand why Conservatives prefer the deaths of millions of people, rather than a responsible approach to population.

Humm... It doen't look like they are worried much about thier water

20091020luguang01.jpg


Chemical waste from Jiangsu Taixing Chemical Industrial District dumped on top of the Yangtze River bank. May 15, 2009

20091020luguang02.jpg



Henan Anyang iron and steel plant’s sewage flowed into Anyang River. March 25, 2008

20091020luguang05.jpg


Guiyu, Guangdong province, rivers and reservoirs have been contaminated, the villager is washing in a seriously polluted pond. November 25, 2005

20091020luguang06.jpg



In the Yellow Sea coastline, countless sewage pipes buried in the beach and even extending into the deep sea. April 28, 2008

20091020luguang08.jpg



In Ma’anshan, Anhui province along the Yangtze River there are many small-scaled Iron selection factories and plastic processing plants. Large amounts of sewage discharged into the Yangtze River June 18, 2009


20091020luguang09.jpg


In Inner Mongolia there were 2 “black dragons” from the Lasengmiao Power Plant covering the nearby villages. July 26, 2005

20091020luguang10.jpg


Jiangsu province Changshu City Fluorine Chemical industry land sewage treatment plant was responsible for collection and processing of the industrial sewage. However they did not, the sewage pipe was extended 1500 meters under the Yangtze River and releasing the sewage there. 2009 June 11


20091020luguang11.jpg


Soil by Yangtze River, was polluted by Anhui Province Ma’anshan Chemical Industrial DistrictJune 26, 2009

20091020luguang12.jpg


A Large amount of the chemical wastewater discharged into Yangtze River from Zhenjiang Titanium mill every day. Less than 1,000 meters away downstream is where the water department of Danyang City gets its water from. June 10, 2009


20091020luguang14.jpg


Anhui Province Cihu Chemical Industry District built a underground pipe to discharge wastewater into the Yangtze River. The wastewater sometimes is black, gray, dark red, or yellow, wastewater from different chemical factories has different colors. June 18, 2009

20091020luguang20.jpg



Hebei Province Shexian Tianjin Iron and steel plant is a heavily polluting company. Company scale is still growing, seriously affecting the lives of local residents. March 18, 2008

20091020luguang16.jpg

These pictures are what Republicans want for this country. I see pollution. They see sound business practice.
 
Prove the policy was modified.

Just saying.


You got to love it:eusa_whistle: Defending of government telling you how many kids you can have, Congradulations!! :clap2:

Given the population and amount of arable land in China, that is exactly what a responsible government of any kind would do in that situation. Any sudden change in rainfall patterns or temperatures, such as we experianced after Tambora, 1815, or Krakatoa, 1883, blew up, will cause the deaths from starvation of a substancial percentage of the population.

I really find it difficult to understand why Conservatives prefer the deaths of millions of people, rather than a responsible approach to population.

Maybe they just believe in Darwin and the survival of the fittest. Or maybe, just maybe, it is because they are actually smarter than you.

They adapted that policy in the late 70s because all the smart scientists who were not talking about your history revision global warming were talking about the fact that the Earth would not be able to support a population of 5 billion human beings. That means that the policy was, and still is, based on faulty science, and not on need.

That is the real reason conservatives oppose government intervention in the right of people to make their own decisions.
 
These pictures are what Republicans want for this country. I see pollution. They see sound business practice.

:cuckoo:

Regulations are what keep this from happening. The right wing doesn't believe in regulation. Is it really so difficult to understand? All you have to do is look over the USMB. The right wingers on that site are representative of right wingers all over the US.

Those pictures are examples of what unregulated business leaves behind.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You got to love it:eusa_whistle: Defending of government telling you how many kids you can have, Congradulations!! :clap2:

Given the population and amount of arable land in China, that is exactly what a responsible government of any kind would do in that situation. Any sudden change in rainfall patterns or temperatures, such as we experianced after Tambora, 1815, or Krakatoa, 1883, blew up, will cause the deaths from starvation of a substancial percentage of the population.

I really find it difficult to understand why Conservatives prefer the deaths of millions of people, rather than a responsible approach to population.

Maybe they just believe in Darwin and the survival of the fittest. Or maybe, just maybe, it is because they are actually smarter than you.

They adapted that policy in the late 70s because all the smart scientists who were not talking about your history revision global warming were talking about the fact that the Earth would not be able to support a population of 5 billion human beings. That means that the policy was, and still is, based on faulty science, and not on need.

That is the real reason conservatives oppose government intervention in the right of people to make their own decisions.

Yea, scientists are bad. And stupid. Not like you guys who can just pull made up facts out your ass.

I love the way you guys prove my point over and over again.
 
These pictures are what Republicans want for this country. I see pollution. They see sound business practice.

:cuckoo:

Regulations are what keep this from happening. The right wing doesn't believe in regulation. Is it really so difficult to understand? All you have to do is look over the USMB. The right wingers on that site are representative of right wingers all over the US.

Those pictures are examples of what unregulated business leaves behind.

:eusa_eh:ahh......Nobody advicates no evironmental regulaton idiot. We advicate less stupid usless regulations and taxes .So that buisnesses can stay in this country and make a profit.. Taxes on Carbon dioxide emissions:cuckoo: Weres the UN condemnation of China? Weres the evironmentalists? You stupid libs don't realize the results of you're stupidity this is one of them.


Can we even grow food here?...Stupid libs are ruining this country...



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twd59PrqCNg"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twd59PrqCNg[/ame]
 
Last edited:
These pictures are what Republicans want for this country. I see pollution. They see sound business practice.

:cuckoo:

Regulations are what keep this from happening. The right wing doesn't believe in regulation. Is it really so difficult to understand? All you have to do is look over the USMB. The right wingers on that site are representative of right wingers all over the US.

Those pictures are examples of what unregulated business leaves behind.

Are they? Or is it market forces that the government follows behind?

What you seem to forget is that the government does not lead, it follows. If the people wanted their country to look like that, it would. The difference between China and here is that the government is in charge there, and doesn't care about the people. Nothing unusual there, governments never care about people, all they care about is power.
 
Yea, scientists are bad. And stupid. Not like you guys who can just pull made up facts out your ass.

I love the way you guys prove my point over and over again.

Were you trying to prove that Old Rocks is an idiot for thinking the Chinese government is basing its one child policy on worry about famine? If so, I am glad I could help.

Please not that I did not attack science, or even scientists, I attacked Old Rocks and his constant attempts to change history by saying things that are untrue. The one child policy was based on the population bomb theory that has since been discredited, not on worry about the consequences of a potential natural disaster.
 
Yea, scientists are bad. And stupid. Not like you guys who can just pull made up facts out your ass.

I love the way you guys prove my point over and over again.

Were you trying to prove that Old Rocks is an idiot for thinking the Chinese government is basing its one child policy on worry about famine? If so, I am glad I could help.

Please not that I did not attack science, or even scientists, I attacked Old Rocks and his constant attempts to change history by saying things that are untrue. The one child policy was based on the population bomb theory that has since been discredited, not on worry about the consequences of a potential natural disaster.

Of course you are not. And when the inevitable happens, then you will blame someone else for not having a plan for it. China has gone through many cycles of starvation in the past where litterally millions starved to death. But the idea of reducing the population to the point that China can weather a drouth without mass starvation by a one child policy is something you find offensive. More offensive than the idea of millions starving to death. I find Conservative morality to be offensive.

Nor has the population bomb been discredited. A wonderful man by the name of Borlaug pushed the limit back a bit. But all it would take is a couple more crop failures like the ones in Pakistan and Russia this year to show the validity of the concept. Or, conversely, one eruption the equal of Tambora.
 

Regulations are what keep this from happening. The right wing doesn't believe in regulation. Is it really so difficult to understand? All you have to do is look over the USMB. The right wingers on that site are representative of right wingers all over the US.

Those pictures are examples of what unregulated business leaves behind.

:eusa_eh:ahh......Nobody advicates no evironmental regulaton idiot. We advicate less stupid usless regulations and taxes .So that buisnesses can stay in this country and make a profit.. Taxes on Carbon dioxide emissions:cuckoo: Weres the UN condemnation of China? Weres the evironmentalists? You stupid libs don't realize the results of you're stupidity this is one of them.


Can we even grow food here?...Stupid libs are ruining this country...



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twd59PrqCNg"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twd59PrqCNg[/ame]

Shawn Insanity? Gawd, can you possibly get a less reliable source?:lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top