New Minimum Wage: $70K/Year

Star

Gold Member
Apr 5, 2009
2,532
614
190
.

CEO's are given about 300 times what their average employee is earning, but at Gravity Payments...

One Company’s New Minimum Wage: $70,000 a Year
By PATRICIA COHEN
APRIL 13, 2015

The idea began percolating, said Dan Price, the founder of Gravity Payments, after he read an article on happiness. It showed that, for people who earn less than about $70,000, extra money makes a big difference in their lives.

His idea bubbled into reality on Monday afternoon, when Mr. Price surprised his 120-person staff by announcing that he planned over the next three years to raise the salary of even the lowest-paid clerk, customer service representative and salesman to a minimum of $70,000.

“Is anyone else freaking out right now?” Mr. Price asked after the clapping and whooping died down into a few moments of stunned silence. “I’m kind of freaking out.”

If it’s a publicity stunt, it’s a costly one. Mr. Price, who started the Seattle-based credit-card payment processing firm in 2004 at the age of 19, said he would pay for the wage increases by cutting his own salary from nearly $1 million to $70,000 and using 75 to 80 percent of the company’s anticipated $2.2 million in profit this year.

The paychecks of about 70 employees will grow, with 30 ultimately doubling their salaries, according to Ryan Pirkle, a company spokesman. The average salary at Gravity is $48,000 year.

Mr. Price’s small, privately owned company is by no means a bellwether, but his unusual proposal does speak to an economic issue that has captured national attention: The disparity between the soaring pay of chief executives and that of their employees.

The United States has one of the world’s largest pay gaps, with chief executives earning nearly 300 times what the average worker makes, according to some economists’ estimates. That is much higher than the 20-to-1 ratio recommended by Gilded Age magnates like J. Pierpont Morgan and the 20th century management visionary Peter Drucker.


<snip>

WTG Dan!


.
 
From what I remember, Ben and Jerry's tried to keep a certain ratio on salaries, from highest to lowest (was it 5:1?), but at some point had to drop that because it wasn't sustainable.

Limits on Executive Pay Easy to Set Hard to Keep - Yahoo Finance

"Other companies have had mixed success in limiting executive pay. Ice-cream maker Ben & Jerry's dropped its pay cap in 1994 when it hired an outside CEO to replace co-founder Ben Cohen. Office-furniture maker Herman Miller Inc. eliminated its salary cap in 1996, as the company faced trouble recruiting top managers. James Sinegal, CEO of Costco Wholesale Corp., has for years voluntarily capped his salary at $350,000, although the company says it doesn't track the ratio of executive-to-worker pay."

excerpts from:

"Limits on Executive Pay: Easy to Set, Hard to Keep"

"Can companies keep good executives without succumbing to the pressure of escalating pay packages? Yes, but it's not easy, as the example of Whole Foods Market Inc. shows.

The natural-foods grocer limits compensation for top executives to a multiple of the average Whole Foods worker's pay. The cap, which covers salaries and bonuses but not stock options, started at eight times average pay in the 1980s, and was raised to 14 times in the early 1990s as the company grew and went public.

Last year, as sales hit $5.6 billion and rivals tried to poach Whole Foods managers, the board of directors raised the cap to 19 times average pay, or $607,800. The increase was needed "to help ensure the retention of our key leadership," Chief Executive John Mackey wrote in a Nov. 2 message to employees. Mr. Mackey said every top executive, except him, had been repeatedly approached by search firms seeking to lure them to rivals."
 
.

CEO's are given about 300 times what their average employee is earning, but at Gravity Payments...

One Company’s New Minimum Wage: $70,000 a Year
By PATRICIA COHEN
APRIL 13, 2015

The idea began percolating, said Dan Price, the founder of Gravity Payments, after he read an article on happiness. It showed that, for people who earn less than about $70,000, extra money makes a big difference in their lives.

His idea bubbled into reality on Monday afternoon, when Mr. Price surprised his 120-person staff by announcing that he planned over the next three years to raise the salary of even the lowest-paid clerk, customer service representative and salesman to a minimum of $70,000.

“Is anyone else freaking out right now?” Mr. Price asked after the clapping and whooping died down into a few moments of stunned silence. “I’m kind of freaking out.”

If it’s a publicity stunt, it’s a costly one. Mr. Price, who started the Seattle-based credit-card payment processing firm in 2004 at the age of 19, said he would pay for the wage increases by cutting his own salary from nearly $1 million to $70,000 and using 75 to 80 percent of the company’s anticipated $2.2 million in profit this year.

The paychecks of about 70 employees will grow, with 30 ultimately doubling their salaries, according to Ryan Pirkle, a company spokesman. The average salary at Gravity is $48,000 year.

Mr. Price’s small, privately owned company is by no means a bellwether, but his unusual proposal does speak to an economic issue that has captured national attention: The disparity between the soaring pay of chief executives and that of their employees.

The United States has one of the world’s largest pay gaps, with chief executives earning nearly 300 times what the average worker makes, according to some economists’ estimates. That is much higher than the 20-to-1 ratio recommended by Gilded Age magnates like J. Pierpont Morgan and the 20th century management visionary Peter Drucker.


<snip>

WTG Dan!


.
This stupid shit again?

What a private company chooses to pay it's employees is NONE OF YOUR FUCKING BUSINESS unless you are said employee
 
If they can make that work for them, great. I am sure their office is flooded with resumes of people wanting to work there. Of course that means the people already there had better be on their game, because they can easily be replaced with someone far better than they are.
As for the relevance to anyone else, there is none.
 

Forum List

Back
Top