Netanyahu's response to UN's resulution.

[rylah]

I believe that "Palestine" referred to the land itself. Jews wanted to be Israeli, not Palestinian. The Arabs could name the land allotted to them as Palestine but they never did. Don't forget, I was in school during that time and I remember the names and terms used. We studied the events because we lived in a time when history was being made.

They named it Palestine you moron, or they wouldn't have called themselves the people of Palestine.

Who originally named the are 'Palestine'?
What language was the word taken from?

Looking through the Italian sources, heirs to the Romans, the word was transmitted to the Romans by the Greeks who transliterated the Egyptian term for the Philistines.

Yes except that the Greeks used the term "allophuloi" instead of 'philistines', which simply means 'other people'.

And indeed the earliest record about the Philistines comes from the temple of Ramses. The Egyptians called these people 'Pleset', very close to the Hebrew 'Pleshet' and other Semitic languages.

Can You tell us what do 'pleset/pleshet/philistine' actually mean in Hebrew or Egyptian?

"Invaders" I think. The Philistines were a seafaring, warlike, non-Semitic people who continuously fought the Israelites. Come to think of it, they were very much like the current Palestinians.

They named it Palestine you moron, or they wouldn't have called themselves the people of Palestine.

Who originally named the are 'Palestine'?
What language was the word taken from?

Looking through the Italian sources, heirs to the Romans, the word was transmitted to the Romans by the Greeks who transliterated the Egyptian term for the Philistines.

Yes except that the Greeks used the term "allophuloi" instead of 'philistines', which simply means 'other people'.

And indeed the earliest record about the Philistines comes from the temple of Ramses. The Egyptians called these people 'Pleset', very close to the Hebrew 'Pleshet' and other Semitic languages.

Can You tell us what do 'pleset/pleshet/philistine' actually mean in Hebrew or Egyptian?

"Invaders" I think. The Philistines were a seafaring, warlike, non-Semitic people who continuously fought the Israelites. Come to think of it, they were very much like the current Palestinians.

You have to separate the history based on archaeological evidence from the biblical fantasy. The Philistines mainly fought against the Egyptians, not the Jews, who arrived later. Peleset is transliterated from hieroglyphs and does not mean invader, it is a place name for the area of the 5 cities that the Philistines founded in what is today southern Palestine from about where Jaffa is to Gaza. Since, the Muslims and Christians of Palestine were minding their own business when the Zionists began invading Palestine from another continent, you have your analogy backwards.

Yes let's follow the archaeological evidence- the Philistines weren't even Semites.

A Very Different Method of Burial

The excavations revealed a burial practice that is very different from that of the earlier Canaanites or the neighboring Judeans. Instead of laying a body in a chamber, then collecting the bones a year later and moving them elsewhere (a "secondary" burial), the individuals buried in the Ashkelon cemetery were buried individually in pits or collectively in tombs and never moved again. A few cremation burials were also identified.

While some other Philistine cities were destroyed in the late ninth to eighth centuries B.C., Ashkelon thrived until its destruction at the hands of Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar in 604 B.C. The city was ultimately reoccupied by the Phoenicians, followed by the Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, and Crusaders, and was ultimately wiped out by the Mamluks, Egypt's Islamic rulers, in 1270 A.D.

 

[rylah]

They named it Palestine you moron, or they wouldn't have called themselves the people of Palestine.

Who originally named the are 'Palestine'?
What language was the word taken from?

Looking through the Italian sources, heirs to the Romans, the word was transmitted to the Romans by the Greeks who transliterated the Egyptian term for the Philistines.

Yes except that the Greeks used the term "allophuloi" instead of 'philistines', which simply means 'other people'.

And indeed the earliest record about the Philistines comes from the temple of Ramses. The Egyptians called these people 'Pleset', very close to the Hebrew 'Pleshet' and other Semitic languages.

Can You tell us what do 'pleset/pleshet/philistine' actually mean in Hebrew or Egyptian?

"Invaders" I think. The Philistines were a seafaring, warlike, non-Semitic people who continuously fought the Israelites. Come to think of it, they were very much like the current Palestinians.

You have to separate the history based on archaeological evidence from the biblical fantasy. The Philistines mainly fought against the Egyptians, not the Jews, who arrived later. Peleset is transliterated from hieroglyphs and does not mean invader, it is a place name for the area of the 5 cities that the Philistines founded in what is today southern Palestine from about where Jaffa is to Gaza. Since, the Muslims and Christians of Palestine were minding their own business when the Zionists began invading Palestine from another continent, you have your analogy backwards.

'Pleset' or 'Pleshet' do indeed mean an 'invader' in local Aramaic languages.

philistine
noun
1.
(sometimes initial capital letter) a person who is lacking in or hostile orsmugly indifferent to cultural values, intellectual pursuits, aestheticrefinement, etc., or is contentedly commonplace in ideas and tastes.
2.
(initial capital letter) a native or inhabitant of ancient Philistia.

adjective
3.
(sometimes initial capital letter) lacking in or hostile to culture.
4.
smugly commonplace or conventional.
5.
(initial capital letter) of or belonging to the ancient Philistines.

 

[montelatici]

They named it Palestine you moron, or they wouldn't have called themselves the people of Palestine.

Who originally named the are 'Palestine'?
What language was the word taken from?

Looking through the Italian sources, heirs to the Romans, the word was transmitted to the Romans by the Greeks who transliterated the Egyptian term for the Philistines.

Yes except that the Greeks used the term "allophuloi" instead of 'philistines', which simply means 'other people'.

And indeed the earliest record about the Philistines comes from the temple of Ramses. The Egyptians called these people 'Pleset', very close to the Hebrew 'Pleshet' and other Semitic languages.

Can You tell us what do 'pleset/pleshet/philistine' actually mean in Hebrew or Egyptian?

"Invaders" I think. The Philistines were a seafaring, warlike, non-Semitic people who continuously fought the Israelites. Come to think of it, they were very much like the current Palestinians.

Who originally named the are 'Palestine'?
What language was the word taken from?

Looking through the Italian sources, heirs to the Romans, the word was transmitted to the Romans by the Greeks who transliterated the Egyptian term for the Philistines.

Yes except that the Greeks used the term "allophuloi" instead of 'philistines', which simply means 'other people'.

And indeed the earliest record about the Philistines comes from the temple of Ramses. The Egyptians called these people 'Pleset', very close to the Hebrew 'Pleshet' and other Semitic languages.

Can You tell us what do 'pleset/pleshet/philistine' actually mean in Hebrew or Egyptian?

"Invaders" I think. The Philistines were a seafaring, warlike, non-Semitic people who continuously fought the Israelites. Come to think of it, they were very much like the current Palestinians.

You have to separate the history based on archaeological evidence from the biblical fantasy. The Philistines mainly fought against the Egyptians, not the Jews, who arrived later. Peleset is transliterated from hieroglyphs and does not mean invader, it is a place name for the area of the 5 cities that the Philistines founded in what is today southern Palestine from about where Jaffa is to Gaza. Since, the Muslims and Christians of Palestine were minding their own business when the Zionists began invading Palestine from another continent, you have your analogy backwards.

Yes let's follow the archaeological evidence- the Philistines weren't even Semites.

A Very Different Method of Burial

The excavations revealed a burial practice that is very different from that of the earlier Canaanites or the neighboring Judeans. Instead of laying a body in a chamber, then collecting the bones a year later and moving them elsewhere (a "secondary" burial), the individuals buried in the Ashkelon cemetery were buried individually in pits or collectively in tombs and never moved again. A few cremation burials were also identified.

While some other Philistine cities were destroyed in the late ninth to eighth centuries B.C., Ashkelon thrived until its destruction at the hands of Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar in 604 B.C. The city was ultimately reoccupied by the Phoenicians, followed by the Greeks, Romans, Byzantines, and Crusaders, and was ultimately wiped out by the Mamluks, Egypt's Islamic rulers, in 1270 A.D.

Who said that Philistines were Semites?

 

[montelatici]

Who originally named the are 'Palestine'?
What language was the word taken from?

Looking through the Italian sources, heirs to the Romans, the word was transmitted to the Romans by the Greeks who transliterated the Egyptian term for the Philistines.

Yes except that the Greeks used the term "allophuloi" instead of 'philistines', which simply means 'other people'.

And indeed the earliest record about the Philistines comes from the temple of Ramses. The Egyptians called these people 'Pleset', very close to the Hebrew 'Pleshet' and other Semitic languages.

Can You tell us what do 'pleset/pleshet/philistine' actually mean in Hebrew or Egyptian?

"Invaders" I think. The Philistines were a seafaring, warlike, non-Semitic people who continuously fought the Israelites. Come to think of it, they were very much like the current Palestinians.

You have to separate the history based on archaeological evidence from the biblical fantasy. The Philistines mainly fought against the Egyptians, not the Jews, who arrived later. Peleset is transliterated from hieroglyphs and does not mean invader, it is a place name for the area of the 5 cities that the Philistines founded in what is today southern Palestine from about where Jaffa is to Gaza. Since, the Muslims and Christians of Palestine were minding their own business when the Zionists began invading Palestine from another continent, you have your analogy backwards.

'Pleset' or 'Pleshet' do indeed mean an 'invader' in local Aramaic languages.

philistine
noun
1.
(sometimes initial capital letter) a person who is lacking in or hostile orsmugly indifferent to cultural values, intellectual pursuits, aestheticrefinement, etc., or is contentedly commonplace in ideas and tastes.
2.
(initial capital letter) a native or inhabitant of ancient Philistia.

adjective
3.
(sometimes initial capital letter) lacking in or hostile to culture.
4.
smugly commonplace or conventional.
5.
(initial capital letter) of or belonging to the ancient Philistines.

Peleset, as transliterated from the Egyptian, does not mean invader. It is the term of the people from the place. The Greeks used this source, not Aramaic. The Romans latinized the Greek term to Philisthim.

 

[rylah]

Looking through the Italian sources, heirs to the Romans, the word was transmitted to the Romans by the Greeks who transliterated the Egyptian term for the Philistines.

Yes except that the Greeks used the term "allophuloi" instead of 'philistines', which simply means 'other people'.

And indeed the earliest record about the Philistines comes from the temple of Ramses. The Egyptians called these people 'Pleset', very close to the Hebrew 'Pleshet' and other Semitic languages.

Can You tell us what do 'pleset/pleshet/philistine' actually mean in Hebrew or Egyptian?

"Invaders" I think. The Philistines were a seafaring, warlike, non-Semitic people who continuously fought the Israelites. Come to think of it, they were very much like the current Palestinians.

You have to separate the history based on archaeological evidence from the biblical fantasy. The Philistines mainly fought against the Egyptians, not the Jews, who arrived later. Peleset is transliterated from hieroglyphs and does not mean invader, it is a place name for the area of the 5 cities that the Philistines founded in what is today southern Palestine from about where Jaffa is to Gaza. Since, the Muslims and Christians of Palestine were minding their own business when the Zionists began invading Palestine from another continent, you have your analogy backwards.

'Pleset' or 'Pleshet' do indeed mean an 'invader' in local Aramaic languages.

philistine
noun
1.
(sometimes initial capital letter) a person who is lacking in or hostile orsmugly indifferent to cultural values, intellectual pursuits, aestheticrefinement, etc., or is contentedly commonplace in ideas and tastes.
2.
(initial capital letter) a native or inhabitant of ancient Philistia.

adjective
3.
(sometimes initial capital letter) lacking in or hostile to culture.
4.
smugly commonplace or conventional.
5.
(initial capital letter) of or belonging to the ancient Philistines.

Peleset, as transliterated from the Egyptian, does not mean invader. It is the term of the people from the place. The Greeks used this source, not Aramaic. The Romans latinized the Greek term to Philisthim.

You have it all backwards, the root p-l-s is from the local languages and differs a little. The further possible meaning can be "Sea people", or "people of Caphtor" which was a common thesis among historians.

The fact that Greeks used it changes nothing, it came from the local Aramaic language family being used in the Canaanite area. They settled in Canaan where Aramaic was spoken, not in Egypt.

 

[montelatici]

Yes except that the Greeks used the term "allophuloi" instead of 'philistines', which simply means 'other people'.

And indeed the earliest record about the Philistines comes from the temple of Ramses. The Egyptians called these people 'Pleset', very close to the Hebrew 'Pleshet' and other Semitic languages.

Can You tell us what do 'pleset/pleshet/philistine' actually mean in Hebrew or Egyptian?

"Invaders" I think. The Philistines were a seafaring, warlike, non-Semitic people who continuously fought the Israelites. Come to think of it, they were very much like the current Palestinians.

You have to separate the history based on archaeological evidence from the biblical fantasy. The Philistines mainly fought against the Egyptians, not the Jews, who arrived later. Peleset is transliterated from hieroglyphs and does not mean invader, it is a place name for the area of the 5 cities that the Philistines founded in what is today southern Palestine from about where Jaffa is to Gaza. Since, the Muslims and Christians of Palestine were minding their own business when the Zionists began invading Palestine from another continent, you have your analogy backwards.

'Pleset' or 'Pleshet' do indeed mean an 'invader' in local Aramaic languages.

philistine
noun
1.
(sometimes initial capital letter) a person who is lacking in or hostile orsmugly indifferent to cultural values, intellectual pursuits, aestheticrefinement, etc., or is contentedly commonplace in ideas and tastes.
2.
(initial capital letter) a native or inhabitant of ancient Philistia.

adjective
3.
(sometimes initial capital letter) lacking in or hostile to culture.
4.
smugly commonplace or conventional.
5.
(initial capital letter) of or belonging to the ancient Philistines.

Peleset, as transliterated from the Egyptian, does not mean invader. It is the term of the people from the place. The Greeks used this source, not Aramaic. The Romans latinized the Greek term to Philisthim.

You have it all backwards, the root p-l-s is from the local languages and differs a little. The further possible meaning can be "Sea people", or "people of Caphtor" which was a common thesis among historians.

The fact that Greeks used it changes nothing, it came from the local Aramaic language family being used in the Canaanite area. They settled in Canaan where Aramaic was spoken, not in Egypt.

"The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c.1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt.

 

[rylah]

"Invaders" I think. The Philistines were a seafaring, warlike, non-Semitic people who continuously fought the Israelites. Come to think of it, they were very much like the current Palestinians.

You have to separate the history based on archaeological evidence from the biblical fantasy. The Philistines mainly fought against the Egyptians, not the Jews, who arrived later. Peleset is transliterated from hieroglyphs and does not mean invader, it is a place name for the area of the 5 cities that the Philistines founded in what is today southern Palestine from about where Jaffa is to Gaza. Since, the Muslims and Christians of Palestine were minding their own business when the Zionists began invading Palestine from another continent, you have your analogy backwards.

'Pleset' or 'Pleshet' do indeed mean an 'invader' in local Aramaic languages.

philistine
noun
1.
(sometimes initial capital letter) a person who is lacking in or hostile orsmugly indifferent to cultural values, intellectual pursuits, aestheticrefinement, etc., or is contentedly commonplace in ideas and tastes.
2.
(initial capital letter) a native or inhabitant of ancient Philistia.

adjective
3.
(sometimes initial capital letter) lacking in or hostile to culture.
4.
smugly commonplace or conventional.
5.
(initial capital letter) of or belonging to the ancient Philistines.

Peleset, as transliterated from the Egyptian, does not mean invader. It is the term of the people from the place. The Greeks used this source, not Aramaic. The Romans latinized the Greek term to Philisthim.

You have it all backwards, the root p-l-s is from the local languages and differs a little. The further possible meaning can be "Sea people", or "people of Caphtor" which was a common thesis among historians.

The fact that Greeks used it changes nothing, it came from the local Aramaic language family being used in the Canaanite area. They settled in Canaan where Aramaic was spoken, not in Egypt.

"The term "Peleset" (transliterated from hieroglyphs as P-r-s-t) is found in five inscriptions referring to a neighboring people or land starting from c.1150 BCE during the Twentieth dynasty of Egypt.


View attachment 105650

And it's found in many other local sources. But it still doesn't mean "neighboring people"...but different expressions of "invaders". Why would Canaanites altogether use that term for such nice neighbors?

But anyway since they were wiped out long time ago, the modern Palestinians have no connection to the Philistines. However it's funny how they chose such an adjective for the name of their movement.
One cannot miss the irony in that...

 

[montelatici]

It refers to the region.

"The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign,[1][2] and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. The Assyrians called the same region "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c.800 BCE through to an Esarhaddon treaty more than a century later.[3][4]

The Palestinians, Christian and Muslims are the descendants of the people that lived in the region during and before Roman times that converted to Christianity over the centuries and definitively became Christian when Christianity became the state religion of Rome. Non-Christians could not reside in Palestine so after that event they had to convert to reside in the area. Most, of course converted to Islam eventually, but not immediately after the Arab conquest. Interestingly, when the Crusaders retook Jerusalem in 1098, most of the inhabitants were still Christian.

Since the Philistines lived in the region too, and people just don't disappear, it is doubtful that no Philistine DNA resides in the current day Palestinians.

 

[rylah]

It refers to the region.

"The first known mention is at the temple at Medinet Habu which refers to the Peleset among those who fought with Egypt in Ramesses III's reign,[1][2] and the last known is 300 years later on Padiiset's Statue. The Assyrians called the same region "Palashtu" or "Pilistu", beginning with Adad-nirari III in the Nimrud Slab in c.800 BCE through to an Esarhaddon treaty more than a century later.[3][4]

The Palestinians, Christian and Muslims are the descendants of the people that lived in the region during and before Roman times that converted to Christianity over the centuries and definitively became Christian when Christianity became the state religion of Rome. Non-Christians could not reside in Palestine so after that event they had to convert to reside in the area. Most, of course converted to Islam eventually, but not immediately after the Arab conquest. Interestingly, when the Crusaders retook Jerusalem in 1098, most of the inhabitants were still Christian.

Since the Philistines lived in the region too, and people just don't disappear, it is doubtful that no Philistine DNA resides in the current day Palestinians.

Tell me who fights wars people or places?

All Your bigoted fantasy stand on one foot- the claim that somehow Jews who kept contributing to the whole world somehow disappeared, but Greek/Cypriot Philistines who somehow became Semites and hold no sign of connection to that forgotten culture -THEY THEY ARE ALIVE-BUT NOT THE JEWS.

 

[montelatici]

There is nothing bigoted about fact. Who said the people that practiced Judaism (and Samaritanism and other religions in the area of current day Palestine) disappeared? They merely converted to Christianity and then Islam.

The Europeans that practiced Judaism were Europeans and some made contributions to Western civilization. But they were Europeans that practiced Judaism, not the native people of Palestine. There were Europeans that practiced Roman Catholicism, Protestants, Orthodox that also contributed to Western civilization, far more actually.

 

[rylah]

There is nothing bigoted about fact. Who said the people that practiced Judaism (and Samaritanism and other religions in the area of current day Palestine) disappeared? They merely converted to Christianity and then Islam.

The Europeans that practiced Judaism were Europeans and some made contributions to Western civilization. But they were Europeans that practiced Judaism, not the native people of Palestine. There were Europeans that practiced Roman Catholicism, Protestants, Orthodox that also contributed to Western civilization, far more actually.

Ah so REAL Jews are not Jewish anymore- THEY ALL converted and stayed in Judea. While all of a sudden Europeans started converting to Judaism and suffer severe persecution for 2000 yrs.
I get You think Arab Muslims are more Jewish than those mythical Europeans who had a mass hysterical conversion.

Much facts....

 

[montelatici]

Of course the Christians that converted to Islam after the Arab conquest of Christian Palestine were the local indigenous people. Who else would they be. Do you believe that all the people in Palestine left Palestine after Christ began teaching during Roman rule? Most Jews converted to Christianity before the existence of Islam. The first Christians practiced Judaism before becoming Christians. The ancestors of the Arab Muslims (and Christians) once practiced the Roman religion, Judaism, Christianity and other religions. Yes, European Jews are descendants of European converts. What is so strange about that?

"Most Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of European women who converted to Judaism"
read more: Study traces Ashkenazi roots to European women who probably converted to Judaism

 

[rylah]

Of course the Christians that converted to Islam after the Arab conquest of Christian Palestine were the local indigenous people. Who else would they be. Do you believe that all the people in Palestine left Palestine after Christ began teaching during Roman rule? Most Jews converted to Christianity before the existence of Islam. The first Christians practiced Judaism before becoming Christians. The ancestors of the Arab Muslims (and Christians) once practiced the Roman religion, Judaism, Christianity and other religions. Yes, European Jews are descendants of European converts. What is so strange about that?

"Most Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of European women who converted to Judaism"
read more: Study traces Ashkenazi roots to European women who probably converted to Judaism

You like facts, here's one including ALL Jewish diasporas, not just the one You're obsessed with;
Blood Brothers: Palestinians and Jews Share Genetic Roots
read more: http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/science/1.681385

 

[sealybobo]

And it seems that English is not your first language, or you are fixated on calling everyone whom opposes you a Jew in a racist and anti semitic context.

You islamonazi stooges are so predictable when you get shown up as ignorant LIARS

Indeed, he is so profoundly anti Semitic that he is unable to see the evidence of it in every one of his posts. He is clearly beyond hope or redemption.

Can someone who is anti semetic ever be redeemed? What do I have to do? Do I have to agree with Israel all the time?

Name one time Israel was ever wrong

No, you can't be redeemed because as your posts show, racism is such a big part of who you are that you can't even see it.

You Jews need to get over it. The days of political correctness are off. Trump can say a Hispanic judge won't be fair and Mexicans are rapists and you voted for him so fuck off Jew!

I love Jewish people! They can live near me, I'll hire or date them, defend them from real anti semetic people, would be fine with one dating my daughter, they remind me of us Greeks. We have a saying, "Jews are just like Greeks only they have money."

But I don't 100% agree with Israel. Fuck you if that makes me anti semetic. Then fine I'm anti semetic you dumb bastard.

Israeli Jews are dicks! Netanyahoos a tool. I do not agree with him or bush.

And fuck the Greeks too. They are always protesting America. I don't agree with their politics. I guess I'm a self loathing Greek.

Anti semetic anti shametic

To sum it all up, you are an ignorant bigot and proud of it.

Stop being vindictive Jews. It's obvious Jews like fucking with the Palestinians.

Why don't the jews do what we did with the American Indians? We don't have any problem from them anymore.

Israel can even honor the Arabs like we do and name their sport teams after them. The Jerusalem Jihadi's. And let the Palestinians run casinos

 

[ForeverYoung436]

There is nothing bigoted about fact. Who said the people that practiced Judaism (and Samaritanism and other religions in the area of current day Palestine) disappeared? They merely converted to Christianity and then Islam.

The Europeans that practiced Judaism were Europeans and some made contributions to Western civilization. But they were Europeans that practiced Judaism, not the native people of Palestine. There were Europeans that practiced Roman Catholicism, Protestants, Orthodox that also contributed to Western civilization, far more actually.

I would hope and expect that Christians made more contributions to Western civilization than Jews, who make up less than 2% of the world population. Proportionally, what Jews have contributed is remarkable. I only hope that the Arabs/Muslims would do so, considering their great numbers. In the past 500 years, they've only contributed to terror innovations. But I don't want to get into a pissing contest--back to the I/P conflict.

 

[Phoenall]

Indeed, he is so profoundly anti Semitic that he is unable to see the evidence of it in every one of his posts. He is clearly beyond hope or redemption.

Can someone who is anti semetic ever be redeemed? What do I have to do? Do I have to agree with Israel all the time?

Name one time Israel was ever wrong

No, you can't be redeemed because as your posts show, racism is such a big part of who you are that you can't even see it.

You Jews need to get over it. The days of political correctness are off. Trump can say a Hispanic judge won't be fair and Mexicans are rapists and you voted for him so fuck off Jew!

I love Jewish people! They can live near me, I'll hire or date them, defend them from real anti semetic people, would be fine with one dating my daughter, they remind me of us Greeks. We have a saying, "Jews are just like Greeks only they have money."

But I don't 100% agree with Israel. Fuck you if that makes me anti semetic. Then fine I'm anti semetic you dumb bastard.

Israeli Jews are dicks! Netanyahoos a tool. I do not agree with him or bush.

And fuck the Greeks too. They are always protesting America. I don't agree with their politics. I guess I'm a self loathing Greek.

Anti semetic anti shametic

To sum it all up, you are an ignorant bigot and proud of it.

Stop being vindictive Jews. It's obvious Jews like fucking with the Palestinians.

Why don't the jews do what we did with the American Indians? We don't have any problem from them anymore.

Israel can even honor the Arabs like we do and name their sport teams after them. The Jerusalem Jihadi's. And let the Palestinians run casinos

Ever thought that it is because they are not as evil as you have been told they are, and the real culprits are the neo nazi's and the arab muslims. That the problems lie with left wing scum that are brainwashed into following the teachings because the Jews are the biggest problem for the communists at the moment.

Why dont you stop being such a prat and leave the Jews alone until they do something wrong

 

[Hollie]

Of course the Christians that converted to Islam after the Arab conquest of Christian Palestine were the local indigenous people. Who else would they be. Do you believe that all the people in Palestine left Palestine after Christ began teaching during Roman rule? Most Jews converted to Christianity before the existence of Islam. The first Christians practiced Judaism before becoming Christians. The ancestors of the Arab Muslims (and Christians) once practiced the Roman religion, Judaism, Christianity and other religions. Yes, European Jews are descendants of European converts. What is so strange about that?

"Most Ashkenazi Jews are descendants of European women who converted to Judaism"
read more: Study traces Ashkenazi roots to European women who probably converted to Judaism

Considering that the Mongols, xtian Crusaders, Arab invaders and others invaded and colonized the geographic area of your invented, mythical "country of Pal'istan', it's obvious your invented Pal'istanians came from elsewhere.

The Jewish people were successful in achieving self-determination and a successful, first world society / economy.

Arabs-Moslems succeeded only in retrogression and failure such as those attributes define the majority of the Middle East under the bootheel of Islamism.

 

[cnm]

There simply is no rational basis in histroy, logic or law for claiming there is anything illegal about Israel building communities in Judea and Samaria.

Except it is on land conquered by one signatory, Israel, from another, Jordan. You've said so yourself.

 

[Phoenall]

There simply is no rational basis in histroy, logic or law for claiming there is anything illegal about Israel building communities in Judea and Samaria.

Except it is on land conquered by one signatory, Israel, from another, Jordan. You've said so yourself.

Go back one step and it is on land granted to the Jews under international law of 1922 invaded and stolen by the arab muslims. The UN did not seem concerned then, any more than they are now when the Jews were attacked by superior forces. They only became involved when Israel started to bomb the crap out of the invaders they took action

 

[toomuchtime_]

There simply is no rational basis in histroy, logic or law for claiming there is anything illegal about Israel building communities in Judea and Samaria.

Except it is on land conquered by one signatory, Israel, from another, Jordan. You've said so yourself.

Of course none of this has anything to do with the so called Palestinians. It was land conquered by Jordan in 1948 and only two countries, Britain and Pakistan recognized it as belonging to Jordan, so the land had no legal status in 1967. It was simply an unincorporated remnant of the former Mandate. In the 1990's Jordan gave up all claim to Judea and Samaria, so again, there is no rational basis in history, law or logic for claiming there is anything illegal about Israel's communities in Judea and Samaria.