Neofascism

the crybaby Left has always portrayed themselves as victims; even as they trample on people's rights and imprison them.

even the murderous Pol Pot regime portrayed themselves as victims as the rounded up and executed anybody with an education
 
the crybaby Left has always portrayed themselves as victims; even as they trample on people's rights and imprison them.

even the murderous Pol Pot regime portrayed themselves as victims as the rounded up and executed anybody with an education

Obviously you wouldn't have been at risk there.
 
Hitler had nothing to do with the left --- unless you consider murdering, torturing, imprisoning and making the first prisoners at Dachau 'having something to do with'.



Hitler called himself and his Party Socialists

it's right in the name dork

gosh you're stupid

Wrong. The name was already in the party when he got there -- and he objected to it. They called themselves National Socialists. And they meant the second term as a social description --- not a government style.

In closing, go fuck yourself and get an education. In that order.



waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!1 crybaby loser!!!!!

because a man who had the influence to send people out to commit genocide was too timid to demand a name change to his own Party after he took control of it

gosh you're moron

ok go cry now
 
Which libtard website did you pilfer that from? the rich got richer, and still are 5 years into a very leftist agenda. In other words...thread fail.

It was "pilfered" from the Encyclopedia Britannica, if you read the OP you wouldn't need to ask. You are free and encouraged to disagree with me, but in doing so I suggest you put away the personal attacks and make a concise and credible argument. Calling my argument a failure is childish, suggesting my source was a "libtard website" was ridiculous. I suggest you find a new hobby, it would be better than embarrassing yourself as you do here.

It appears to be all he's got (witness his witless diaper rash over here).

Hence the surname "weasel" I guess.
Awwww, did I hurt little pogostick's feelings?
 
Hitler called himself and his Party Socialists

it's right in the name dork

gosh you're stupid

Wrong. The name was already in the party when he got there -- and he objected to it. They called themselves National Socialists. And they meant the second term as a social description --- not a government style.

In closing, go fuck yourself and get an education. In that order.



waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!1 crybaby loser!!!!!

because a man who had the influence to send people out to commit genocide was too timid to demand a name change to his own Party after he took control of it

gosh you're moron

ok go cry now
Pogostick rode the short bus to school.
 
actually Hitler did say he and his Party WERE SOCIALISTS


your idiotic attempt to re-write history is so typical of the loony, in-dennial Left though

you're a joke.

Hitler, spoken to Otto Strasser, Berlin, May 21, 1930:


I am a Socialist, and a very different kind of Socialist from your rich friend, Count Reventlow. . . . What you understand by Socialism is nothing more than Marxism.
 
It was "pilfered" from the Encyclopedia Britannica, if you read the OP you wouldn't need to ask. You are free and encouraged to disagree with me, but in doing so I suggest you put away the personal attacks and make a concise and credible argument. Calling my argument a failure is childish, suggesting my source was a "libtard website" was ridiculous. I suggest you find a new hobby, it would be better than embarrassing yourself as you do here.

It appears to be all he's got (witness his witless diaper rash over here).

Hence the surname "weasel" I guess.
Awwww, did I hurt little pogostick's feelings?

No, you buried yourself in ad hominem. Again.
 
does this sound like a right-winger leftard?
i mean lets' believe lying progressive LOSERS IN DENIAL; and not the historical QUOTES from actual NAZIS



Gregor Strasser, National Socialist theologian, said:


We National Socialists are enemies, deadly enemies, of the present capitalist system with its exploitation of the economically weak … and we are resolved under all circumstances to destroy this system
 
Which is essentially meaningless. The Congress and President already have enough visibility and it doesn't stop them from doing anything.

In therapy your counselor would call you on your, "Yes, but" responses. As I said, we'll never agree and I tire in the attempt to respond to such banalities.

This thread is about bripat, bedowin62 and the other Neo Fascists who pretend to be something other than what they are.

Yes, this thread is a partisan attack on people you don't like, we all know that.

This thread is an accurate depiction of callous conservatives, racists and authoritarians. Those who hope to pass laws preventing gays and lesbians to marry, women to choose to have a child or not, gay and lesbian patriots to serve in our military, individuals to band together in unions and bargain collectively for wages and benefits, Muslims from building a mosque near the WTC and those who demean the working poor. Yep, I don't like those people. I also don't like terrorists, criminals, demagogues or charlatans. I also dislike but really should pity stupid people, and that includes bripat though I do consider him to be challenged by reality (i.e. insane).
 
LET'S RECAP LEFT-WNG NUTCASE SHALL WE?

ok they called themselves Socialists; (i know moron; Hitler wussed out of demanding a name change to his own Party because the word Socialist was already in it for whatever reason; according to your moronic tale)

what an idiot you are

oh and they declared themselves to be "deadly enemies" of the capitalist system

yea real right-winges those

ur a moron
 
In therapy your counselor would call you on your, "Yes, but" responses. As I said, we'll never agree and I tire in the attempt to respond to such banalities.

This thread is about bripat, bedowin62 and the other Neo Fascists who pretend to be something other than what they are.

Yes, this thread is a partisan attack on people you don't like, we all know that.

This thread is an accurate depiction of callous conservatives, racists and authoritarians. Those who hope to pass laws preventing gays and lesbians to marry, women to choose to have a child or not, gay and lesbian patriots to serve in our military, individuals to band together in unions and bargain collectively for wages and benefits, Muslims from building a mosque near the WTC and those who demean the working poor. Yep, I don't like those people. I also don't like terrorists, criminals, demagogues or charlatans. I also dislike but really should pity stupid people, and that includes bripat though I do consider him to be challenged by reality (i.e. insane).



you'e a hapless idiot lying to yourself about virtually everything. your conclusion that this thread is an accurate depiction of conservatives is itself worthless
 
This thread is an accurate depiction of callous conservatives, racists and authoritarians. Those who hope to pass laws preventing gays and lesbians to marry, women to choose to have a child or not, gay and lesbian patriots to serve in our military, individuals to band together in unions and bargain collectively for wages and benefits, Muslims from building a mosque near the WTC and those who demean the working poor. Yep, I don't like those people. I also don't like terrorists, criminals, demagogues or charlatans. I also dislike but really should pity stupid people, and that includes bripat though I do consider him to be challenged by reality (i.e. insane).
==========================================

a left-wing idiot wrote the above.
how many ways is it wrong?

several i can see off the bat; though i'm typing as i see them.
a charge of racism that isnt backed up; so boring and typical

a charge of callousnes that isnt backed up; typical. maybe you mean right-wingers with the gall to ask how left-wing losers can say things are so much better now and turn around and insist that welfare and food stamps and unemployment compensation cant be cut by one penny or one day of eligibility?

libs are bomb-throwing losers who cant stop lying
 
the crybaby Left has always portrayed themselves as victims; even as they trample on people's rights and imprison them.

even the murderous Pol Pot regime portrayed themselves as victims as the rounded up and executed anybody with an education

Obviously you wouldn't have been at risk there.


Neither would 95 percent of the democratic party, which is why they are spiritual kjn to those people, ih and they admire dictators like that...freedom is for abortions and homos only
 
many on the right dont care if gays marry; and many on the Left do oppose it. in fact your Dear Leader was one of them; until he "evolved"; chameleon that he is

libs are losers who lie to themselves

Muslims buidling a mosque near the WTC want to do that for their own agenda and you're too much of an idiot to admit it.

the Left wants to get rid of the secret ballot when it comes to companies deciding to go with unions; real American you idiotic hypocrite
 
Von Mises in his Human Action (p. 171) said:


There are two patterns for the realization of socialism. The first pattern (we may call it the Lenin or Russian pattern) . . . . the second pattern (we may call it the Hindenburg or German Pattern) nominally and seemingly preserves private ownership of the means of production and keeps the appearance of ordinary markets, prices, wages, and interest rates. There are, however, no longer entrepreneurs, but only shop managers … bound to obey unconditionally the orders issued by government.

This is precisely how Hitler governed when he achieved dictatorial power.
 
This thread is an accurate depiction of callous conservatives, racists and authoritarians.
No, it's an accurate description of what leftards think (if we can call it that). You've ignored the fact that conservatives prefer a smaller less obtrusive government and tried to compare them with fascists with some vague ideas.
Those who hope to pass laws preventing gays and lesbians to marry,
Opposing gay marriage is fascist? It doesn't even have a majority national support. That makes a lot of fascists.
women to choose to have a child or not, gay and lesbian patriots to serve in our military, individuals to band together in unions and bargain collectively for wages and benefits, Muslims from building a mosque near the WTC and those who demean the working poor. Yep, I don't like those people. I also don't like terrorists, criminals, demagogues or charlatans. I also dislike but really should pity stupid people, and that includes bripat though I do consider him to be challenged by reality (i.e. insane).
Opposing abortion on demand is fascist? Half the country does. That puts you out in fruitloop land. Which fascist army had open homosexuality?

Lot's of slander, no critical thinking. Try something less challenging, like polishing pogo's stick.
 
Last edited:
Two prevailing historical myths that the left has propagated successfully is that Hitler was a far right wing conservative and was democratically elected in 1933 (a blow at bourgeois democracy and conservatives). Actually, he was defeated twice in the national elections (he became chancellor in a smoke-filled-room appointment by those German politicians who thought they could control him — see “What? Hitler Was Not Elected?”) and as head of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, he considered himself a socialist, and was one by the evidence of his writings and the his economic policies.
 
LET'S RECAP LEFT-WNG NUTCASE SHALL WE?

ok they called themselves Socialists; (i know moron; Hitler wussed out of demanding a name change to his own Party because the word Socialist was already in it for whatever reason; according to your moronic tale)

It's called "history", little one. The reason was NSDAP was adapted from an existing popular party in Austria at the time, and the reason Hitler went along with it is that both he and the NSDAP were only reaching for power at the time, that time being 1920, not the third season episode of Hogan's Heroes that apparently make up your schooling, DUMBASS.

Hitler's idea was to rename it the "Social Revolutionary Party" ----- which again underscores the social change he was going for. Genocide of races and dissenters and intellectuals is social change. THAT is the sense in which the word "socialist" was being used. DUH.

what an idiot you are

oh and they declared themselves to be "deadly enemies" of the capitalist system

-- and? What, are you so simplistic you think anyone who opposes a capitalist status quo is a "liberal"? Liberals created capitalism, freak. This is where your abject lack of education embarrasses you.

And more than that, they were enemies of communists and socialists, who once again were the first prisoners at Dachau -- not to mention intellectuals, homosexuals, Jews, Gypsies and nonconformists.

yea real right-winges those

Hypernationalism... hyperreligionism... persecution of races and dissenters... invasion of neighboring countries... yup.

ur a moron

"ur" isn't even a fucking word.
 
Last edited:
this is for the idiot claiming that Hitler didnt like the name Socialist in NAZI; but was somehow too timid to have it changed:



“We are socialists, we are enemies of today’s capitalistic economic system for the exploitation of the economically weak, with its unfair salaries, with its unseemly evaluation of a human being according to wealth and property instead of responsibility and performance, and we are all determined to destroy this system under all conditions.” –Adolf Hitler
 

Forum List

Back
Top