Nazi Party On Rise In Germany & Sweden!

[Wry Catcher]

The OP has laid out a problem and attributes it to President Obama in the OP. The question is: "Does man make history or does history make the man?"

The quote above was from a lower division course in World History in my Freshman year.

Think about the conflicts on going in the middle east, the historical events which took place over a thousand years ago and the mandates created by the UK and US after the first world war.

Consider the CIA's intervention in Iran in 1953 and the installation of the Shah.

Think about the relative stability in the ME under admittedly despotic leaders, and the relationship with Iraq by US authorities such as Dick Cheney subsequent to the take over of our embassy during the Iranian Revolution, and the course of history which changed during our occupation of Iraq.

Does any educated person really believe President Obama created the mess unfolding in the ME? The mess was created long before the birth of President Obama, and to attribute his efforts to creating it is simply not true.

 

[Sallow]

Strange feelings about this one. The Nazi party at least THIS time is going after islam and LAST time they were partners of islam. Now the Euro news service IS calling them radical right wingers but being a nationalist has NOTHING to do with a wing its a thinking based on your country serving YOU first before all others.

700 islamic "refugees" have disappeared off the radar and Germans have NO idea what they they are up to or where they are at. Seven hundred terrorists hidden in a sea of refugees. Of course if you looked into that sea of refugees the liberals would scream "Racial Profiling!"

These refugees/terrorists ARE the result of the Obama war in Syria much like the ones coming here. I think we conservatives NEED to remember to not only give Obama FULL credit for starting a war in Syria AND the resulting terrorist killings of Germans but ALSO he laid the ground work NEEDED to inspire and rise the Nazi party.

But then he IS a peace prize winner right?
THIRD REICH REVIVAL: MUSLIM REFUGEES FIREBOMBED AND BEATEN IN GERMANY

No big shock here you liking Nazis.

 

[irosie91]

The OP has laid out a problem and attributes it to President Obama in the OP. The question is: "Does man make history or does history make the man?"

The quote above was from a lower division course in World History in my Freshman year.

Think about the conflicts on going in the middle east, the historical events which took place over a thousand years ago and the mandates created by the UK and US after the first world war.

Consider the CIA's intervention in Iran in 1953 and the installation of the Shah.

Think about the relative stability in the ME under an admittedly despotic leaders, and the relationship with Iraq by US authorities such as Dick Cheney subsequent to the take over of our embassy during the Iranian Revolution, and the course of history which changed during our occupation of Iraq.

Does any educated person really believe President Obama created the mess unfolding in the ME? The mess was created long before the birth of President Obama, and to attribute his efforts to creating it is simply not true.

so true-----Obama is not responsible for the current mess in Iran and the middle
east-------BUT neither is BUSH not is that PUTATIVE CRAP------"we (the usa)
INSTALLED THE SHAH (against the will of the Iranian people)" The mess in
the middle east has been ongoing for 1400 years Learn some history----we did
not CREATE the Shiite shit and the sunny shit------it EXISTED before the USA
was invented. We ----responded to the filth ---as did Russia and England and
France and even Germany over the past more than 100 years based on alliances
respective ENEMIES made. People who hate Obama blame Obama. People
who hate the USA claim the USA created it. All such people are mindless
jerks

 

[Tehon]

The OP has laid out a problem and attributes it to President Obama in the OP. The question is: "Does man make history or does history make the man?"

The quote above was from a lower division course in World History in my Freshman year.

Think about the conflicts on going in the middle east, the historical events which took place over a thousand years ago and the mandates created by the UK and US after the first world war.

Consider the CIA's intervention in Iran in 1953 and the installation of the Shah.

Think about the relative stability in the ME under an admittedly despotic leaders, and the relationship with Iraq by US authorities such as Dick Cheney subsequent to the take over of our embassy during the Iranian Revolution, and the course of history which changed during our occupation of Iraq.

Does any educated person really believe President Obama created the mess unfolding in the ME? The mess was created long before the birth of President Obama, and to attribute his efforts to creating it is simply not true.

Why would any logical thinking person pretend Obama is just an innocent bystander at the mercy of history?

 

[irosie91]

The OP has laid out a problem and attributes it to President Obama in the OP. The question is: "Does man make history or does history make the man?"

The quote above was from a lower division course in World History in my Freshman year.

Think about the conflicts on going in the middle east, the historical events which took place over a thousand years ago and the mandates created by the UK and US after the first world war.

Consider the CIA's intervention in Iran in 1953 and the installation of the Shah.

Think about the relative stability in the ME under an admittedly despotic leaders, and the relationship with Iraq by US authorities such as Dick Cheney subsequent to the take over of our embassy during the Iranian Revolution, and the course of history which changed during our occupation of Iraq.

Does any educated person really believe President Obama created the mess unfolding in the ME? The mess was created long before the birth of President Obama, and to attribute his efforts to creating it is simply not true.

Why would any logical thinking person pretend Obama is just an innocent bystander at the mercy of history?

Of what do you imagine him "guilty"?

 

[irosie91]

The people who are demonstrating against immigration in Russia and Sweden etc are
REACTIONARY-----and -----by convention called ---persons on the right-----but
calling them Nazis is as idiotic as imagining that all Republicans are Nazis and
all Democrats are communists

 

[DarkFury]

Strange feelings about this one. The Nazi party at least THIS time is going after islam and LAST time they were partners of islam. Now the Euro news service IS calling them radical right wingers but being a nationalist has NOTHING to do with a wing its a thinking based on your country serving YOU first before all others.

700 islamic "refugees" have disappeared off the radar and Germans have NO idea what they they are up to or where they are at. Seven hundred terrorists hidden in a sea of refugees. Of course if you looked into that sea of refugees the liberals would scream "Racial Profiling!"

These refugees/terrorists ARE the result of the Obama war in Syria much like the ones coming here. I think we conservatives NEED to remember to not only give Obama FULL credit for starting a war in Syria AND the resulting terrorist killings of Germans but ALSO he laid the ground work NEEDED to inspire and rise the Nazi party.

But then he IS a peace prize winner right?
THIRD REICH REVIVAL: MUSLIM REFUGEES FIREBOMBED AND BEATEN IN GERMANY

No big shock here you liking Nazis.

View attachment 54651

That is NOT where the mixed feelings are you idiot. If you could read you would see it.

 

[DarkFury]

The people who are demonstrating against immigration in Russia and Sweden etc are
REACTIONARY-----and -----by convention called ---persons on the right-----but
calling them Nazis is as idiotic as imagining that all Republicans are Nazis and
all Democrats are communists

The press is calling them Nazi. They call themselves "Nationalists".
The press may have used that term to cause more harm to them.

 

[irosie91]

The people who are demonstrating against immigration in Russia and Sweden etc are
REACTIONARY-----and -----by convention called ---persons on the right-----but
calling them Nazis is as idiotic as imagining that all Republicans are Nazis and
all Democrats are communists

The press is calling them Nazi. They call themselves "Nationalists".
The press may have used that term to cause more harm to them.

yes-----it would be nice to make a note of which news services are so
discrediting themselves. It is good to know

 

[Wry Catcher]

The OP has laid out a problem and attributes it to President Obama in the OP. The question is: "Does man make history or does history make the man?"

The quote above was from a lower division course in World History in my Freshman year.

Think about the conflicts on going in the middle east, the historical events which took place over a thousand years ago and the mandates created by the UK and US after the first world war.

Consider the CIA's intervention in Iran in 1953 and the installation of the Shah.

Think about the relative stability in the ME under an admittedly despotic leaders, and the relationship with Iraq by US authorities such as Dick Cheney subsequent to the take over of our embassy during the Iranian Revolution, and the course of history which changed during our occupation of Iraq.

Does any educated person really believe President Obama created the mess unfolding in the ME? The mess was created long before the birth of President Obama, and to attribute his efforts to creating it is simply not true.

Why would any logical thinking person pretend Obama is just an innocent bystander at the mercy of history?

He's not a bystander, as for innocent that's a loaded word. Explain what he is guilty of, with some detail, and explain how each of us is not at the mercy of history.

I'm not advocating we do not have free will, I'm simply stating a fact that events of the past have an impact on our opportunities and limit our choices.

There is no book teaching us how to act beginning at birth, and no do overs. Obama had no blueprint for what he inherited, nor did Bush or any POTUS before them. That does not excuse mistakes, it explains them and provides context.

 

[irosie91]

The OP has laid out a problem and attributes it to President Obama in the OP. The question is: "Does man make history or does history make the man?"

The quote above was from a lower division course in World History in my Freshman year.

Think about the conflicts on going in the middle east, the historical events which took place over a thousand years ago and the mandates created by the UK and US after the first world war.

Consider the CIA's intervention in Iran in 1953 and the installation of the Shah.

Think about the relative stability in the ME under an admittedly despotic leaders, and the relationship with Iraq by US authorities such as Dick Cheney subsequent to the take over of our embassy during the Iranian Revolution, and the course of history which changed during our occupation of Iraq.

Does any educated person really believe President Obama created the mess unfolding in the ME? The mess was created long before the birth of President Obama, and to attribute his efforts to creating it is simply not true.

Why would any logical thinking person pretend Obama is just an innocent bystander at the mercy of history?

He's not a bystander, as for innocent that's a loaded word. Explain what he is guilty of, with some detail, and explain how each of us is not at the mercy of history.

I'm not advocating we do not have free will, I'm simply stating a fact that events of the past have an impact on our opportunities and limit our choices.

There is no book teaching us how to act beginning at birth, and no do overs. Obama had no blueprint for what he inherited, nor did Bush or any POTUS before them. That does not excuse mistakes, it explains them and provides context.

my take on Obama is that it is possible that nice and very intelligent guy
that he is------he may not have been up to the challenge of that which he
inherited --------very few people--if any----would be

 

[Tehon]

The OP has laid out a problem and attributes it to President Obama in the OP. The question is: "Does man make history or does history make the man?"

The quote above was from a lower division course in World History in my Freshman year.

Think about the conflicts on going in the middle east, the historical events which took place over a thousand years ago and the mandates created by the UK and US after the first world war.

Consider the CIA's intervention in Iran in 1953 and the installation of the Shah.

Think about the relative stability in the ME under an admittedly despotic leaders, and the relationship with Iraq by US authorities such as Dick Cheney subsequent to the take over of our embassy during the Iranian Revolution, and the course of history which changed during our occupation of Iraq.

Does any educated person really believe President Obama created the mess unfolding in the ME? The mess was created long before the birth of President Obama, and to attribute his efforts to creating it is simply not true.

Why would any logical thinking person pretend Obama is just an innocent bystander at the mercy of history?

He's not a bystander, as for innocent that's a loaded word. Explain what he is guilty of, with some detail, and explain how each of us is not at the mercy of history.

I'm not advocating we do not have free will, I'm simply stating a fact that events of the past have an impact on our opportunities and limit our choices.

There is no book teaching us how to act beginning at birth, and no do overs. Obama had no blueprint for what he inherited, nor did Bush or any POTUS before them. That does not excuse mistakes, it explains them and provides context.

He is guilty of supporting the overthrow of the government of a sovereign nation. No different than Iran in the 50's. I thought we were supposed to learn from history.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The people who are demonstrating against immigration in Russia and Sweden etc are
REACTIONARY-----and -----by convention called ---persons on the right-----but
calling them Nazis is as idiotic as imagining that all Republicans are Nazis and
all Democrats are communists

The press is calling them Nazi. They call themselves "Nationalists".
The press may have used that term to cause more harm to them.

It depends what they and you mean by using the word "Nationalists"

na·tion·al·ism
ˈnaSH(ə)nəˌlizəm/
noun

1. patriotic feeling, principles, or efforts.
   synonyms: patriotism, patriotic sentiment, flag-waving, xenophobia, chauvinism,jingoism
   "their extreme nationalism was frightening"
   • an extreme form of this, especially marked by a feeling of superiority over other countries.
     plural noun: nationalisms
   • advocacy of political independence for a particular country.

Keep this in mind:

National Socialism, German Nationalsozialismus, also called Nazism or Naziism, totalitarian movement led by Adolf Hitler as head of the Nazi Party in Germany. In its intense nationalism, mass appeal, and dictatorial rule, National Socialism shared many elements with Italian fascism. However, Nazism was far more extreme both in its ideas and in its practice. In almost every respect it was an anti-intellectual and a theoretical movement, emphasizing the will of the charismatic dictator as the sole source of inspiration of a people and a nation, as well as a vision of annihilation of all enemies of the Aryan Volk as the one and only goal of Nazi policy.

 

[irosie91]

The OP has laid out a problem and attributes it to President Obama in the OP. The question is: "Does man make history or does history make the man?"

The quote above was from a lower division course in World History in my Freshman year.

Think about the conflicts on going in the middle east, the historical events which took place over a thousand years ago and the mandates created by the UK and US after the first world war.

Consider the CIA's intervention in Iran in 1953 and the installation of the Shah.

Think about the relative stability in the ME under an admittedly despotic leaders, and the relationship with Iraq by US authorities such as Dick Cheney subsequent to the take over of our embassy during the Iranian Revolution, and the course of history which changed during our occupation of Iraq.

Does any educated person really believe President Obama created the mess unfolding in the ME? The mess was created long before the birth of President Obama, and to attribute his efforts to creating it is simply not true.

Why would any logical thinking person pretend Obama is just an innocent bystander at the mercy of history?

He's not a bystander, as for innocent that's a loaded word. Explain what he is guilty of, with some detail, and explain how each of us is not at the mercy of history.

I'm not advocating we do not have free will, I'm simply stating a fact that events of the past have an impact on our opportunities and limit our choices.

There is no book teaching us how to act beginning at birth, and no do overs. Obama had no blueprint for what he inherited, nor did Bush or any POTUS before them. That does not excuse mistakes, it explains them and provides context.

He is guilty of supporting the overthrow of the government of a sovereign nation. No different than Iran in the 50's. I thought we were supposed to learn from history.

Your allegation is nonsense. Once war looms------those lands INVOLVED are
no longer "sovereign" The assad alliance with Russia and Iran-----renders the assad regime an enemy of the USA Germany's attack on England and its alliance with Japan made it an enemy of the USA---------"sovereign" became moot

 

[Sallow]

Strange feelings about this one. The Nazi party at least THIS time is going after islam and LAST time they were partners of islam. Now the Euro news service IS calling them radical right wingers but being a nationalist has NOTHING to do with a wing its a thinking based on your country serving YOU first before all others.

700 islamic "refugees" have disappeared off the radar and Germans have NO idea what they they are up to or where they are at. Seven hundred terrorists hidden in a sea of refugees. Of course if you looked into that sea of refugees the liberals would scream "Racial Profiling!"

These refugees/terrorists ARE the result of the Obama war in Syria much like the ones coming here. I think we conservatives NEED to remember to not only give Obama FULL credit for starting a war in Syria AND the resulting terrorist killings of Germans but ALSO he laid the ground work NEEDED to inspire and rise the Nazi party.

But then he IS a peace prize winner right?
THIRD REICH REVIVAL: MUSLIM REFUGEES FIREBOMBED AND BEATEN IN GERMANY

No big shock here you liking Nazis.

View attachment 54651

That is NOT where the mixed feelings are you idiot. If you could read you would see it.

There should be no "mixed" feelings about this you Nazi. There should only be one.

Disgust.

 

[DarkFury]

Strange feelings about this one. The Nazi party at least THIS time is going after islam and LAST time they were partners of islam. Now the Euro news service IS calling them radical right wingers but being a nationalist has NOTHING to do with a wing its a thinking based on your country serving YOU first before all others.

700 islamic "refugees" have disappeared off the radar and Germans have NO idea what they they are up to or where they are at. Seven hundred terrorists hidden in a sea of refugees. Of course if you looked into that sea of refugees the liberals would scream "Racial Profiling!"

These refugees/terrorists ARE the result of the Obama war in Syria much like the ones coming here. I think we conservatives NEED to remember to not only give Obama FULL credit for starting a war in Syria AND the resulting terrorist killings of Germans but ALSO he laid the ground work NEEDED to inspire and rise the Nazi party.

But then he IS a peace prize winner right?
THIRD REICH REVIVAL: MUSLIM REFUGEES FIREBOMBED AND BEATEN IN GERMANY

No big shock here you liking Nazis.

View attachment 54651

That is NOT where the mixed feelings are you idiot. If you could read you would see it.

There should be no "mixed" feelings about this you Nazi. There should only be one.

Disgust.

Never said I liked Nazis you retard BUT until you look at an issue from as many angles as possible you will never solve one. As far as YOU telling me what to think? Good luck with that.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The OP has laid out a problem and attributes it to President Obama in the OP. The question is: "Does man make history or does history make the man?"

The quote above was from a lower division course in World History in my Freshman year.

Think about the conflicts on going in the middle east, the historical events which took place over a thousand years ago and the mandates created by the UK and US after the first world war.

Consider the CIA's intervention in Iran in 1953 and the installation of the Shah.

Think about the relative stability in the ME under an admittedly despotic leaders, and the relationship with Iraq by US authorities such as Dick Cheney subsequent to the take over of our embassy during the Iranian Revolution, and the course of history which changed during our occupation of Iraq.

Does any educated person really believe President Obama created the mess unfolding in the ME? The mess was created long before the birth of President Obama, and to attribute his efforts to creating it is simply not true.

Why would any logical thinking person pretend Obama is just an innocent bystander at the mercy of history?

He's not a bystander, as for innocent that's a loaded word. Explain what he is guilty of, with some detail, and explain how each of us is not at the mercy of history.

I'm not advocating we do not have free will, I'm simply stating a fact that events of the past have an impact on our opportunities and limit our choices.

There is no book teaching us how to act beginning at birth, and no do overs. Obama had no blueprint for what he inherited, nor did Bush or any POTUS before them. That does not excuse mistakes, it explains them and provides context.

He is guilty of supporting the overthrow of the government of a sovereign nation. No different than Iran in the 50's. I thought we were supposed to learn from history.

Which government was that, and which puppet did he put in power?

 

[Tehon]

The OP has laid out a problem and attributes it to President Obama in the OP. The question is: "Does man make history or does history make the man?"

The quote above was from a lower division course in World History in my Freshman year.

Think about the conflicts on going in the middle east, the historical events which took place over a thousand years ago and the mandates created by the UK and US after the first world war.

Consider the CIA's intervention in Iran in 1953 and the installation of the Shah.

Think about the relative stability in the ME under an admittedly despotic leaders, and the relationship with Iraq by US authorities such as Dick Cheney subsequent to the take over of our embassy during the Iranian Revolution, and the course of history which changed during our occupation of Iraq.

Does any educated person really believe President Obama created the mess unfolding in the ME? The mess was created long before the birth of President Obama, and to attribute his efforts to creating it is simply not true.

Why would any logical thinking person pretend Obama is just an innocent bystander at the mercy of history?

He's not a bystander, as for innocent that's a loaded word. Explain what he is guilty of, with some detail, and explain how each of us is not at the mercy of history.

I'm not advocating we do not have free will, I'm simply stating a fact that events of the past have an impact on our opportunities and limit our choices.

There is no book teaching us how to act beginning at birth, and no do overs. Obama had no blueprint for what he inherited, nor did Bush or any POTUS before them. That does not excuse mistakes, it explains them and provides context.

He is guilty of supporting the overthrow of the government of a sovereign nation. No different than Iran in the 50's. I thought we were supposed to learn from history.

Which government was that, and which puppet did he put in power?

Oh my bad, I forgot that there is more than one to choose from when discussing Obama. The Assad government in this case. Though I could just as easily make a case for Libya.

 

[Sallow]

Strange feelings about this one. The Nazi party at least THIS time is going after islam and LAST time they were partners of islam. Now the Euro news service IS calling them radical right wingers but being a nationalist has NOTHING to do with a wing its a thinking based on your country serving YOU first before all others.

700 islamic "refugees" have disappeared off the radar and Germans have NO idea what they they are up to or where they are at. Seven hundred terrorists hidden in a sea of refugees. Of course if you looked into that sea of refugees the liberals would scream "Racial Profiling!"

These refugees/terrorists ARE the result of the Obama war in Syria much like the ones coming here. I think we conservatives NEED to remember to not only give Obama FULL credit for starting a war in Syria AND the resulting terrorist killings of Germans but ALSO he laid the ground work NEEDED to inspire and rise the Nazi party.

But then he IS a peace prize winner right?
THIRD REICH REVIVAL: MUSLIM REFUGEES FIREBOMBED AND BEATEN IN GERMANY

No big shock here you liking Nazis.

View attachment 54651

That is NOT where the mixed feelings are you idiot. If you could read you would see it.

There should be no "mixed" feelings about this you Nazi. There should only be one.

Disgust.

Never said I liked Nazis you retard BUT until you look at an issue from as many angles as possible you will never solve one. As far as YOU telling me what to think? Good luck with that.

Polish your boots and move to Germany.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The OP has laid out a problem and attributes it to President Obama in the OP. The question is: "Does man make history or does history make the man?"

The quote above was from a lower division course in World History in my Freshman year.

Think about the conflicts on going in the middle east, the historical events which took place over a thousand years ago and the mandates created by the UK and US after the first world war.

Consider the CIA's intervention in Iran in 1953 and the installation of the Shah.

Think about the relative stability in the ME under an admittedly despotic leaders, and the relationship with Iraq by US authorities such as Dick Cheney subsequent to the take over of our embassy during the Iranian Revolution, and the course of history which changed during our occupation of Iraq.

Does any educated person really believe President Obama created the mess unfolding in the ME? The mess was created long before the birth of President Obama, and to attribute his efforts to creating it is simply not true.

Why would any logical thinking person pretend Obama is just an innocent bystander at the mercy of history?

He's not a bystander, as for innocent that's a loaded word. Explain what he is guilty of, with some detail, and explain how each of us is not at the mercy of history.

I'm not advocating we do not have free will, I'm simply stating a fact that events of the past have an impact on our opportunities and limit our choices.

There is no book teaching us how to act beginning at birth, and no do overs. Obama had no blueprint for what he inherited, nor did Bush or any POTUS before them. That does not excuse mistakes, it explains them and provides context.

He is guilty of supporting the overthrow of the government of a sovereign nation. No different than Iran in the 50's. I thought we were supposed to learn from history.

Which government was that, and which puppet did he put in power?

Oh my bad, I forgot that there is more than one to choose from when discussing Obama. The Assad government in this case. Though I could just as easily make a case for Libya.

Your response leaves me to no other conclusion than to characterize you as ignorant or a liar. The possibility that you are both does not escape me.

But I could be wrong, since it is so easy, make the case for both and I'll offer a sincere Mea Culpa. Don't and ... well you know.