Navajo Nation objects to private moon mission placing human remains on the lunar surface

[SassyIrishLass]

"Enslaved persons removed with the other nations ranged from approximately three hundred in the Creek Nation to more than twelve hundred in the Chickasaw Nation. When the Civil War erupted in 1861, more than eight thousand blacks were enslaved in Indian Territory. They comprised 14 percent of the population."

History of slavery in Oklahoma - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Well that is inconvenient

 

[BackAgain]

Oh it has comic value, if nothing else. Something to argue about I spose.

I wouldn’t choose it. But if a neighbor croaks and has enough of an estate to hire a space entrepreneur to put his cremains on the moon, it wouldn’t change my life at all.

In fact, roughly stated, I consider most places on Earth to have much higher “sacred” value than our dead rock satellite.

 

[Yarddog]

The moon has been collecting space debris forever, there is no way humans will ever desecrate the moon.
In my opinion humans, as well as all life on earth are a natural part of this solar system. Good or bad, we belong here
and if we gravitate our way to the moon and leave our own space debris, its only part of the natural process.

 

[MinTrut]

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

So were Native Americans.

Yes, they were. And pretty good at it. Comanche, Sioux, Aztec, all quite good at it.

 

[Magnus]

Sorry, but just because your people find the moon to be "sacred" does not mean other people and their cultures feel as you do. It is not of the earth, you don't get to decide it's yours.
Just wait, any day now you'll be hearing indigenous people claiming white people stole their moon.

Navajo Nation objects to private moon mission placing human remains on the lunar surface

"The act of depositing human remains and other materials, which could be perceived as discards in any other location, on the moon is tantamount to desecration of this sacred space."

www.space.com

Yup, and Galileo was nearly burnt at the stake because he dared claim that the Earth and the planets revolved around the sun.

Religion, eh?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Indians owned black slaves and didn't free them until 20 years after the Civil War ended.

Actually they did, but you be you.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

There were Paleoamerican Clovis 10,000 years before any Native American tribe and even pre-Clovis humans in this country before then.

Bullshit. The earth is only 6000 years old. Are you a Christian brother ?

 

[drudge X]

Funny shit with indigenous folks is if they took a dump at a location out of nowhere, the entire are where they took a dump is sacred.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

drudge X is funny

 

[TNHarley]

EuroAmericans were land stealers, yes, they were.

The article was probably pubished by a cousin brother nephew uncle who thinks he is Coyote.

Funny, so were the indians.

 

[Lord Long Rod]

EuroAmericans were land stealers, yes, they were.

The article was probably pubished by a cousin brother nephew uncle who thinks he is Coyote.

Who did they "Steal" the land from? I do not recall the injuns having deeds to the land. Essentially they were squatters.

Include in your reply, "I am a liar. Me sorry for being big lump of shit."

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

EuroAmericans were land stealers, yes, they were.

The article was probably pubished by a cousin brother nephew uncle who thinks he is Coyote.

It’s a good thing or our leaders would still be licking toads and tripping out to make decisions for the well being of the country.

 

[Lord Long Rod]

Let's face it, if the white man had not settled what is now America, then the land would have been wasted, laying unused except for some plots of maize (you call it "corn"!) and as an injun outhouse. In fact, if the white man had not taken it, some other power eventually would have taken it. Besides, these injun fuckers were just squatting on the land anyway. They had no system of land ownership. Therefore, they cannot make any logical claim to land ownership. The land was not owned by anyone in their folklore. It was owned by mother earth, or the wind, or some stupid shit.

Second, let's look at what kind of people the injuns were. First off, some of them had slaves. Secondly, they married very young girls and knocked them up. Third, their customary courtship was rape. Fourth, after we shooed them off the land to make use of it, they did not know what to do. They were like children. Over time we gave them all sorts of economic, social, and legal subsides. But they just pissed it all away. They only reason they do ok with casinos on injun land is because they hire whitey to come in and run them. Even black Americans have prospered lightyears beyond what the injun has achieved.

I propose that we take the "n-word" and replace it with "injun" as the most foul racial epithet in the English language because as a people/group they suck. Sure, there are exceptions. You may meet "Chief Smackabitch" and share a beer while double teaming some bar slut in the backseat of his Honda and think he is a cool guy. But that is different from judging the people as a group. These people, like all others, must assimilate into the dominant culture. If they want to go out in the woods and live and not bother anyone, then they can do it. There is more than enough land on their reservations for each one of them to go live in tee pees and shit in the bushes, just like they did before whitey arrived. Nothing is stopping them.

Well, no, I guess there is one thing stopping them: They desire for the white man's dollar. Thus, the ass-backward "We am a victim" bullshit they plan continuously. This is amplified by white leftist vermin, who use the red man as pawns to further their ideological goals.