Nauseating Liberal Women

[Flopper]

Why waste time watching a video of a Fox News program? We know the conclusion before it starts. Sometime I wounder if Fox News has done a piece that was really favorable to the Democrats. Of course that would wouldn't be "fair and balanced".

U think Fox News faked her acceptance address? Give me a break.. Only NBC does shit like that...

No, Fox didn't make it up, they just took two 10 second out of context clips of her shaking her fist at the camera in which she repeated the administration claims about job growth and the environment. The moderator leads the panel of 6 of which 5 strongly support the moderator's views, into a discussion of job growth and energy, which rapidly turns into an attack on the administration's assertion that development of alternative energy leads to job growth. The panel backed up by the moderator strongly disagrees, a foregone conclusion 30 seconds into the broadcast. The point is emphasized with a ticker of unemployment statistics for the nation which irrelevant to the discussion and a flashing alert banner in the background.

This is a typical Fox News hatchet job. Speaking of hatchet jobs, Gina McCarthy's qualifications go well beyond a Bachelor of Arts in Social Anthropology as reported, but also includes a Master of Science in Environmental Health Engineering and Planning, environmental adviser to five Massachusetts governors, including former Governor Mitt Romney, and Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection for 5 years, a few details you omitted.

Just more Fair and Balanced reporting from Fox News right?

 

[mudwhistle]

I don't think that anyone who disagrees with me is a Neanderthal. Having said that, I'm a pretty smart guy. And the Neanderthals were not a stupid as your statement assumes.

Oh, I see.

You just like arguing for arguing's sake.

I don't consider defending women against moronic women bashers to be "arguing for arguing's sake". The fact that you do says much more about you than it does about me.

What you do love doing is confusing the issue with false claims designed to change the subject. This pathetic display is unnecessary.

You're not defending anyone from anything really. At least not effectively.

The fact that she's a woman has no bearing. She sounds like a nut. The fact that she's a woman doesn't change that. This a tactic the left has been using for at least 40 years. It's an easy way to act like you're winning a debate when you're getting your clock cleaned. This is why it is so easy to be on the left.

 

[Abraham3]

You completely ignored McCarthy's list of of qualifications. Is that why it's so easy to be on the right?

 

[mudwhistle]

Why waste time watching a video of a Fox News program? We know the conclusion before it starts. Sometime I wounder if Fox News has done a piece that was really favorable to the Democrats. Of course that would wouldn't be "fair and balanced".

U think Fox News faked her acceptance address? Give me a break.. Only NBC does shit like that...

No, Fox didn't make it up, they just took two 10 second out of context clips of her shaking her fist at the camera in which she repeated the administration claims about job growth and the environment. The moderator leads the panel of 6 of which 5 strongly support the moderator's views, into a discussion of job growth and energy, which rapidly turns into an attack on the administration's assertion that development of alternative energy leads to job growth. The panel backed up by the moderator strongly disagrees, a foregone conclusion 30 seconds into the broadcast. The point is emphasized with a ticker of unemployment statistics for the nation which irrelevant to the discussion and a flashing alert banner in the background.

This is a typical Fox News hatchet job. Speaking of hatchet jobs, Gina McCarthy's qualifications go well beyond a Bachelor of Arts in Social Anthropology as reported, but also includes a Master of Science in Environmental Health Engineering and Planning, environmental adviser to five Massachusetts governors, including former Governor Mitt Romney, and Commissioner of the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection for 5 years, a few details you omitted.

Just more Fair and Balanced reporting from Fox News right?

That's rich.

NBC and ABC do this all of the time, yet you're saying Fox is the guilty party.

 

[Flopper]

You completely ignored McCarthy's list of of qualifications. Is that why it's so easy to be on the right?

That's often the case, quote the facts that support the claim and ignore all that don't.

 

[mudwhistle]

The EPA has become a bunch of jack-booted thugs.

 

[Abraham3]

NBC and ABC do this all of the time, yet you're saying Fox is the guilty party.

The discussion concerned an episode of a Fox show so, yes, of course, Fox is the guilty party.

What about McCarthy's actual qualifications? Any comment? Any comment on Fox's poor recitation of the facts?

 

[Abraham3]

The EPA has become a bunch of jack-booted thugs.

In what way?

 

[mudwhistle]

NBC and ABC do this all of the time, yet you're saying Fox is the guilty party.

The discussion concerned an episode of a Fox show so, yes, of course, Fox is the guilty party.

What about McCarthy's actual qualifications? Any comment? Any comment on Fox's poor recitation of the facts?

I'm not really impressed with her qualifications. If she had a PHD maybe, but a BS and MS does not make her an expert. Bush had a Masters in Business Administration yet you lefties claim he was an idiot. Those kinds of degrees are merely the first stage of one's development. Her experience is what makes all of the difference. Getting grades and applying it improperly are two different things. She's spent all of her professional life as an "Environmentalist", perfect for a administration bent on ruining the economy with Green Energy initiatives, but not the greatest background if you want to have someone run the agency with a fair minded approach.

 

[mudwhistle]

The problem with most of these types is they want to force us into alternative energy sources without first making sure that we have any that are workable.

 

[Flanders]

Is there no end to the female freaks in Barack Taqiyya’s administration. Here’s another one:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5i9ZjGSYOI&feature=player_embedded]Interior Secretary Sally Jewell: I hope there are no climate change deniers here - YouTube[/ame]​

Interior Secretary: I don't want any climate-change deniers in my department
By SEAN HIGGINS | AUGUST 11, 2013 AT 4:30 PM

Interior Secretary: I don't want any climate-change deniers in my department | WashingtonExaminer.com

Did you notice that the Jewell did not offer any conclusive proof that nature’s activities are manmade. If asked, I’m sure she would trot out the “consensus” crapola.

I must say Jewell has the name to go with her stupidity. She’s a real gem.

 

[orogenicman]

Is there no end to the female freaks in Barack Taqiyya’s administration. Here’s another one:

Interior Secretary Sally Jewell: I hope there are no climate change deniers here - YouTube​

Interior Secretary: I don't want any climate-change deniers in my department
By SEAN HIGGINS | AUGUST 11, 2013 AT 4:30 PM

Interior Secretary: I don't want any climate-change deniers in my department | WashingtonExaminer.com

Did you notice that the Jewell did not offer any conclusive proof that nature’s activities are manmade. If asked, I’m sure she would trot out the “consensus” crapola.

I must say Jewell has the name to go with her stupidity. She’s a real gem.

Your statement implies that man's activities have no impact on the environment. You'd have to have been asleep for your entire life to believe that. Talk about crapola.

 

[mudwhistle]

Is there no end to the female freaks in Barack Taqiyya’s administration. Here’s another one:

Interior Secretary Sally Jewell: I hope there are no climate change deniers here - YouTube​

Interior Secretary: I don't want any climate-change deniers in my department
By SEAN HIGGINS | AUGUST 11, 2013 AT 4:30 PM

Interior Secretary: I don't want any climate-change deniers in my department | WashingtonExaminer.com

Did you notice that the Jewell did not offer any conclusive proof that nature’s activities are manmade. If asked, I’m sure she would trot out the “consensus” crapola.

I must say Jewell has the name to go with her stupidity. She’s a real gem.

Your statement implies that man's activities have no impact on the environment. You'd have to have been asleep for your entire life to believe that. Talk about crapola.

The biggest impact on environment in the wild is from folks like Sally Jewell, who go out in some of the most remote areas and leave their garbage behind. Hikers trash up some of the most pristine areas in the United States.

BTW, how do these people plan on forcing China, Mexico, and Russia into following our lead? We don't have any pull with them. They pollute indiscriminately, and we still have the same problem because their economies cannot afford the kind of Green policies Obama and company want to force down our throats. Everyone has to participate, developing countries included.

 

[orogenicman]

Is there no end to the female freaks in Barack Taqiyya’s administration. Here’s another one:

Interior Secretary Sally Jewell: I hope there are no climate change deniers here - YouTube​

Did you notice that the Jewell did not offer any conclusive proof that nature’s activities are manmade. If asked, I’m sure she would trot out the “consensus” crapola.

I must say Jewell has the name to go with her stupidity. She’s a real gem.

Your statement implies that man's activities have no impact on the environment. You'd have to have been asleep for your entire life to believe that. Talk about crapola.

The biggest impact on environment in the wild is from folks like Sally Jewell, who go out in some of the most remote areas and leave their garbage behind. Hikers trash up some of the most pristine areas in the United States.

BTW, how do these people plan on forcing China, Mexico, and Russia into following our lead? We don't have any pull with them. They pollute indiscriminately, and we still have the same problem because their economies cannot afford the kind of Green policies Obama and company want to force down our throats. Everyone has to participate, developing countries included.

I couldn't tell you how many times I seen deniers post that complaint. First of all, what we do is not dependent on what other countries do. Secondly, if we are the "leader of the world", then perhaps we should start acting like it and set the example. And finally, China is actually starting to make changes, but of course, has a very long way to go. That said, they are already ahead of us in the manufacturing capacity for alternative energy, and unlike us, are addressing these issues in their long term plans, (something we don't even have because we rarely have long term plans for anything).

No, I think the real issue here is that the companies that moved overseas from here so they could get away with taking criminal advantage of the labor force and the lax environmental laws are now concerned that these countries will finally start cleaning up their act, and that leaves these companies with nowhere to go. Sniffle sniffle. A single tear runs down my cheek.

As for your claim that the biggest impact we make to the environment is hikers leaving trash on the trail is just so laughable, my side actually hurts looking at that statement.

 

[Flopper]

NBC and ABC do this all of the time, yet you're saying Fox is the guilty party.

The discussion concerned an episode of a Fox show so, yes, of course, Fox is the guilty party.

What about McCarthy's actual qualifications? Any comment? Any comment on Fox's poor recitation of the facts?

I'm not really impressed with her qualifications. If she had a PHD maybe, but a BS and MS does not make her an expert. Bush had a Masters in Business Administration yet you lefties claim he was an idiot. Those kinds of degrees are merely the first stage of one's development. Her experience is what makes all of the difference. Getting grades and applying it improperly are two different things. She's spent all of her professional life as an "Environmentalist", perfect for a administration bent on ruining the economy with Green Energy initiatives, but not the greatest background if you want to have someone run the agency with a fair minded approach.

She's certainly has a better resume than Bush's EPA Director, Christine Todd Whitman who had only a degree in government, an ex-governor with 40 years in politics, and no education or experience in environmental science. Obama's first EPA director, Lisa Perez Jackson graduated summa cum laude in chemical engineering, followed by master's degree, then worked her way up from a staff engineer in the EPA.

Personal skills such as management style, leadership ability, and commitment are far better qualifications for an administrative position in government than just technical training and experience.

 

[Flanders]

She's certainly has a better resume than Bush's EPA Director, Christine Todd Whitman who had only a degree in government, an ex-governor with 40 years in politics, and no education or experience in environmental science. Obama's first EPA director, Lisa Perez Jackson graduated summa cum laude in chemical engineering, followed by master's degree, then worked her way up from a staff engineer in the EPA.

Personal skills such as management style, leadership ability, and commitment are far better qualifications for an administrative position in government than just technical training and experience.

To Flopper: The UN’s propaganda machine takes care of the science. From their perspective the best EPA Administer is the one that can sell the lies without looking like a fool. Education is incidental. The different education backgrounds of EPA Administrators prove it is about politics not science.

 

[Flopper]

She's certainly has a better resume than Bush's EPA Director, Christine Todd Whitman who had only a degree in government, an ex-governor with 40 years in politics, and no education or experience in environmental science. Obama's first EPA director, Lisa Perez Jackson graduated summa cum laude in chemical engineering, followed by master's degree, then worked her way up from a staff engineer in the EPA.

Personal skills such as management style, leadership ability, and commitment are far better qualifications for an administrative position in government than just technical training and experience.

To Flopper: The UN’s propaganda machine takes care of the science. From their perspective the best EPA Administer is the one that can sell the lies without looking like a fool. Education is incidental. The different education backgrounds of EPA Administrators prove it is about politics not science.

All top level government administration is about politics regardless of whether we're discussing the director of the EPA, NASA, FBI, Budget, or whatever. Knowledge of the subject area is important but so is politics. An administrator who lacks political skills will not succeed.

 

[freedombecki]

Some fine crankdom on display, a creative merging of the conservative issues with women with the conservative retardation about global warming. Two stupid conspiracy theories merged into a new higher-level conspiracy theory. Most conservatives will just lazily parrot their cult's standard dogma, so it's a treat to see one that puts forth the effort to raise the lunacy to new levels.

A cat hissing about dogma... taking notes...

 

[Flanders]

All top level government administration is about politics regardless of whether we're discussing the director of the EPA, NASA, FBI, Budget, or whatever. Knowledge of the subject area is important but so is politics. An administrator who lacks political skills will not succeed.

To Flopper: Getting a top job is always politics; however, you are trying to make your case by mixing necessary bureaucracies with parasite bureaucracies. That is not to say that necessary bureaucracies are above implementing the Socialist agenda. Example: The IRS. Need I say more?

Worse still, my worst nightmare came true. After years of saying —— NEVER LET A DEMOCRAT GET ANYWHERE THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY—— Democrats now control all of the intelligence agencies through the Director of National Intelligence. God only knows what Democrats are doing to the country in the Department of Homeland Security.

In the case of the EPA the bureaucracy itself is a political agenda. The EPA has no more to do with science than the National Endowment for the Arts has to do with art. The EPA and the NEA are only two federal bureaucracies that exist for the sole purpose of promoting socialism/communism. The EPA is the most dangerous of them all because of the United Nations.

Incidentally, all the good little Communists flocked to the environmental movement after the Soviet Union imploded.

 

[orogenicman]

Sometimes I think that conservatism was hatched out of a government lab using an experimental drug containing concentrated stupidity. Then I realize, no, they were just born that way. Poor dears.