Nauseating Liberal Women

I wonder if the IRS violated the Hatch Act? Senator Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.) is looking into EPA violations. I cannot see the difference between the two. To me, federal employees in both agencies were campaigning for Barack Taqiyya’s agenda. The methods were different but the result is the same.

Incidentally, Senator Inhofe is the most knowledgeable member of Congress when it comes to the manmade global warming fraud. He’s the guy to see if there is any hope of nailing EPA employees for violating the Hatch Act:


On Tuesday, OFA announced a list of climate change deniers in Congress and said the organization will soon be holding events in congressional districts of many of these lawmakers. The day following the announcement, the White House held environmental advocacy events in Providence, RI and Hartford, Conn.

"The Obama Administration's apparent coordination with the campaign arm and the White House leave me no choice but to investigate," said Inhofe.

"Just as the OFA has called for light to be shed on members of Congress not in lockstep with the President's agenda, I will work to shed light on the coincidence of coordination in the Obama Administration we continue to see unfold," Inhofe said.

Senator Launches Probe to See If WH Violated Hatch Act to Promote Climate Agenda
August 15, 2013 - 3:37 PM
By Craig Bannister

Senator Launches Probe to See If WH Violated Hatch Act to Promote Climate Agenda | CNS News

If Inhofe calls them up to testify there is not a chance they are going to lie their way out of it à la IRS employees. Either they tell the truth or they rollover on the White House.
 
Last edited:
Inhofe is the absolute worst excuse for a national leader that has ever walked the halls of Congress. He should be impeached.
 
At the risk of feeding Democrat party vote-getting strategy that says conservatives hate women allow me to remind everyone that a list of all of the Democrat women in government, the positions they held, and everything they stood for, is a who’s who of what went wrong with this country since the 19th Amendment was ratified. No matter how many nauseating liberal women the public learns about, one more always pops up connected to a destructive, anti-America, policy. Here’s another:

images

Energy industry expert, Robert Bradley, Jr., writing on the Master Resource website in June 2012 took note of a Greenwire—Energy & Environmental News—profile of Ms. Zichal noting that, for all her talk about “outreach” to sectors of the energy industry, “we have the irony of Ms. Zichal trying to square the circle of real consumer-driven energy vs. politically correct energy.”

Behind-the-scenes player in the Obama administration’s advancement of the global warming/climate change hoax

In point of fact, Ms. Zichal has been a behind-the-scenes player in the Obama administration’s advancement of the global warming/climate change hoax, in efforts to shut down coal-fired plants, and thwarting access to the estimated ten billion barrels of oil in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, along with other ways to limit the production of energy the nation requires.

The recent report by the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change finally admitted the fact that the planet has been in a cooling cycle for nearly seventeen years. The report has been thoroughly discredited as regards the “science” it has been citing; based almost entirely on rigged computer models.

The White House cited Ms. Zichal for the work she has performed there, “most recently developing our bold climate action plan”, saying she will be missed. The notion that the White House or any other entity on Earth could do anything about the climate is absurd.

“Heather will be missed here at the White House, but our work on this important issue will go on”, said the announcement of her departure. I’m guessing that she will find a new job with the Sierra Club or some similar environmental organization devoted to harming the best interests of the nation.

Who is Heather Zichal?
By Alan Caruba Monday, October 14, 2013

Who is Heather Zichal?

See this thread for more:

 
Last edited:
She's certainly has a better resume than Bush's EPA Director, Christine Todd Whitman who had only a degree in government, an ex-governor with 40 years in politics, and no education or experience in environmental science. Obama's first EPA director, Lisa Perez Jackson graduated summa cum laude in chemical engineering, followed by master's degree, then worked her way up from a staff engineer in the EPA.

Personal skills such as management style, leadership ability, and commitment are far better qualifications for an administrative position in government than just technical training and experience.

To Flopper: The UN’s propaganda machine takes care of the science. From their perspective the best EPA Administer is the one that can sell the lies without looking like a fool. Education is incidental. The different education backgrounds of EPA Administrators prove it is about politics not science.
All top level government administration is about politics regardless of whether we're discussing the director of the EPA, NASA, FBI, Budget, or whatever. Knowledge of the subject area is important but so is politics. An administrator who lacks political skills will not succeed.

An administrator who conducts PURGES like what she's proposed is instituting a tyranny.

If you can't win on the science -- FORCE the win thru politics.. Good plan...
"Better Govt thru Tyranny" ---- should be an ad campaign for the Obama Revolution..
 
Poor Flanders has issues with women.

That is the point of this thread, right? You know, highlighting the mental instability displayed by many conservatives when they encounter a woman who won't obey.
 
Fasten your seat belt before you listen to Gina McCarthy in the first 25 seconds of the video. Move the cursor to 3:00 and listen to her qualifications. Listen to the entire video if you want the truth:


Gina McCarthy joins all of the other nauseating liberal women Barack Taqiyya elevated to lofty positions. His other women are anti-America, brutal, baby-killing, harridans, while McCarthy is so screwy I’m beginning to think the president declared war on women by appointing a wacky woman to head one of the most destructive federal bureaucracies. What better way to show that everything feminazis stand for is wrong?

A few days ago I first saw Gina McCarthy deliver her remarks with all of the certainty of a fool explaining why the moon is made of blue cheese. She even looks and talks like someone suffering from a mental illness. She’s convinced everybody else is crazy. But it was an article by Norman Rogers that put her in perspective for me.

I thought I had heard everything there was to hear about socialism/communism in the Soviet Union. I was wrong. Mr. Rogers told me something I did not know before this morning:


Louis Fischer, born in 1896 in Philadelphia, was a journalist who became a supporter and believer in the Soviet Union and world communism. He lived in Moscow for many years. In an essay in The God That Failed Fischer describes how in the middle 1930's the Soviets ordered all writers to "treat the present as though it did not exist and the future as if it had already arrived." That became known as Socialist Realism. Russian workers who lived in poverty and shared a single room with other families were depicted as well fed, smiling and happy. That was the communist depiction of the future, a future that never arrived.

Socialist Realism was promotion of fantasy for political reasons. The present did not live up to the enthusiastic promises and predictions that accompanied the founding of the communist state. Rather than admit error, the supporters constructed a mental fantasy world. The promises would still come true, but they would be delayed for understandable reasons. In the meantime they pretended the promises had already come true.

The horrible truth is that Barack Taqiyya’s entire administration is promoting the same old Soviet Union utopian fantasies; none more delusional than saving the world with alternative energy:

According to the preachers of global warming, the science behind predictions of climate doom is solid and settled. But, the supposed source of authoritative climate science, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) does not even make predictions. They craftily make projections. A prediction is a statement about what you think will happen in the future. A projection is what is spit out of a computer model when you input guesses about future emissions. And, get this; the different computer models disagree with each other about those projections, by a lot. The IPCC fixes this by simply taking an average of the projections of the many computer models. They are breaking new ground in mathematical statistics, an opinion poll of computers. This is called a multi-model ensemble (that's French) and it is dressed up in a lot of fancy mathematics.

I've barely scratched the surface of global warming fantasy. Unfortunately the human mind easily become fixated on an idea, and once fixated, evidence and facts have little or no effect. You need social pressure or outright brainwashing to clear out the cobwebs.

August 8, 2013
Climate Realism and Socialist Realism
By Norman Rogers

Articles: Climate Realism and Socialist Realism

Here’s the reality. Global warming is a United Nations scheme to gain taxing authority over the American people. For all practical purposes the EPA is a United Nations agency. Note the word internationally in the following excerpt:

Rather than argue against his proposals, our leaders in Congress should endorse them and start the overdue debate about what bigger steps are needed and how to achieve them — domestically and internationally.

Friday, Aug 2, 2013 08:25 AM EDT
Former EPA heads urge fellow Republicans toward climate action
In an Op-Ed for the New York Times, the Republican leaders ask Congress to endorse Obama's proposals
By Lindsay Abrams

Former EPA heads urge fellow Republicans toward climate action - Salon.com

The true reasons four Republicans gave credibility to the global warming hoax are shady at best:

1. They hope to make some money à la Solyndra-type investments in the next round of failed alternative energy companies. Thirty-three such failures cost taxpayers billions in the last round.

2. They are doing the UN’s dirty work.

3. A combination of 1 & 2.

I lean toward number 3.

NOTE: Former New Jersey governor, Christie Todd Whitman, was slated for bigger things among establishment Republicans before she ran the EPA. Thankfully, she did herself in before she could do more damage. Bottom line: Beware of New Jersey’s governors.

Incidentally, Lisa Jackson, the previous head of the EPA, is the personification of a petty bureaucratic dictator; so I wondered why she wasn’t invited to join the Republicans in calling for Congress to implement Barack Taqiyya’s global warming agenda? I suspect she wasn’t invited because her name on the list would have poisoned the well. After all, Republicans are supposed to be the gold standard when it comes to defending America against UN taxing authority schemes.

Let me close on an unrelated personal note. A friend asked me why I usually capitalize the words Socialist & Communist?

My reply: A few years ago, after years of showing that socialism/communism is a religion, I decided it was proper to use an upper case S & C for the same reason everybody capitalizes Catholic, Muslim, Buddhist, and so on.

I don't want anyone to think I've dropped my principles when I say:

GOD, ARE YOU STUPID

I'm simply making an observation of demonstrable fact.
 
Poor Flanders has issues with women.

That is the point of this thread, right? You know, highlighting the mental instability displayed by many conservatives when they encounter a woman who won't obey.

I can sum up this caveman's OP in 8 words..

Duh, Obama a commie, global warming a hoax.

I don't want anyone to think I've dropped my principles when I say:

GOD, ARE YOU STUPID

I'm simply making an observation of demonstrable fact.

Three responses from angry halfwits attacking me which is the only way they can defend the terrible things liberal women did to this country. I have the record of their destruction to go on; everything from infanticide to turning children over to the government to treason. Every top Democrat woman is a baby butcher.

Nancy Pelosi is a shining example of the kind of woman they admire but cannot defend. She’s had her nose so far up Mikhail Gorbachev’s rear end since the early 1990s he covers his nose when she sneezes.

See #5 permalink in this thread:



The jig is up

If you start at the beginning of the Victorian era the best way to slander a decent woman was to call her a whore. Even today, how many decent young girls are shamed in high school by a rejected, angry, boy, or a jealous girlfriend? The technique of personal destruction is learned at an early age by liberals. I know what I’m talking about because kids without shame do not grow up to be conservatives.

Calling a woman a gold digger was the second pet slander. The joke there was that men with nothing often leveled the charge. And how’s this for a Catch 22! Women had to rely on men for their well-being which made it easy to call a woman a gold digger when she asked for a living wage.

NOTE: Government larceny is provable but not technically gold digging. Perhaps Democrat lady crooks in government are the true gold diggers in today’s world.

This is my point. For centuries, the charges of slut and gold digger hid a multitude of sin. Basically, if a woman was lucky enough to avoid the charges of slut or gold digger she escaped every other label. Not so since the 19th Amendment. Democrat women in government showed that a woman can be a bum of the vilest kind. One need only look at the things they champion beginning with baby killing and UN-loving treason.
 
Whoa... do you think they let him walk the streets without adult supervision?

So, hey, Flanders, you gay? My daughter knows some real cute boys that could swing your way. Maybe that'd cool your jets enough that you could stop swinging for the nickel seats at humans with vaginas.
 
So, hey, Flanders, you gay? My daughter knows some real cute boys that could swing your way. Maybe that'd cool your jets enough that you could stop swinging for the nickel seats at humans with vaginas.

To Abraham3: God only knows what your daughter is like with a father like you. Men like you embrace the foulest of women in order to disguise your own latent homosexuality. It’s your way of saying “Love me, too.”
 
So, hey, Flanders, you gay? My daughter knows some real cute boys that could swing your way. Maybe that'd cool your jets enough that you could stop swinging for the nickel seats at humans with vaginas.

To Abraham3: God only knows what your daughter is like with a father like you. Men like you embrace the foulest of women in order to disguise your own latent homosexuality. It’s your way of saying “Love me, too.”

I suspect that like her father, Abe's daughter is awesome. Are you are humanphobe or what?
 
So, hey, Flanders, you gay? My daughter knows some real cute boys that could swing your way. Maybe that'd cool your jets enough that you could stop swinging for the nickel seats at humans with vaginas.

To Abraham3: God only knows what your daughter is like with a father like you. Men like you embrace the foulest of women in order to disguise your own latent homosexuality. It’s your way of saying “Love me, too.”

Thank you Oro. She is awesome.

Mr Flanders, on the other hand, is, really, the most sadly pathetic individual I have seen in a great long while. Dude, you REALLY need some help. Go find somebody to talk to. Damn near anyone would do. That's cause you'd have a really tough time finding anyone, anywhere that wasn't working better upstairs... way better. Take their advice, whatever they say. Maybe first,though, you should make certain that they're really there...

Wow....
 
Last edited:
I guess I should have added this to my summation.

Flanders is accepting donations to the he-Man woman haters club.
 
All top level government administration is about politics regardless of whether we're discussing the director of the EPA, NASA, FBI, Budget, or whatever. Knowledge of the subject area is important but so is politics. An administrator who lacks political skills will not succeed.

To Flopper: Getting a top job is always politics; however, you are trying to make your case by mixing necessary bureaucracies with parasite bureaucracies. That is not to say that necessary bureaucracies are above implementing the Socialist agenda. Example: The IRS. Need I say more?

Worse still, my worst nightmare came true. After years of saying —— NEVER LET A DEMOCRAT GET ANYWHERE THE INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY—— Democrats now control all of the intelligence agencies through the Director of National Intelligence. God only knows what Democrats are doing to the country in the Department of Homeland Security.

In the case of the EPA the bureaucracy itself is a political agenda. The EPA has no more to do with science than the National Endowment for the Arts has to do with art. The EPA and the NEA are only two federal bureaucracies that exist for the sole purpose of promoting socialism/communism. The EPA is the most dangerous of them all because of the United Nations.

Incidentally, all the good little Communists flocked to the environmental movement after the Soviet Union imploded.

So....you're actually utterly insane as well as severely retarded. I guess it was obvious from your first post that you were completely delusional but thanks for revealing the real depths of your dementia.
 

Forum List

Back
Top