- Thread starter
- #41
Why does just about every woman that Obama picks to be in his Administration look Gay?
To mudwhistle: Company for Hillary.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why does just about every woman that Obama picks to be in his Administration look Gay?
I think everyone gives a flying fuck who he picks.
Who gives a flying fuck if they "look gay"? You do realize, of course, that the woman about which this farce of a thread is dedicated, is married with three children, right? You didn't know? Huh.
Right, and no Gay ever got married and had kids.
I was just wondering if this was a fashion statement or if they really all seem to be leaning towards lesbianism.
Who gives a flying fuck if they "look gay"? You do realize, of course, that the woman about which this farce of a thread is dedicated, is married with three children, right? You didn't know? Huh.
Right, and no Gay ever got married and had kids.
I was just wondering if this was a fashion statement or if they really all seem to be leaning towards lesbianism.
So, not only do you have something against people who look gay (whether or not they really are), you also have an issue with actual gay people, gay married people, married people who look gay but really aren't, and also, strangely enough, with fashion people. Interesting. How long have you experienced these delusions of "better than thou"? are there any other people you don't like? Or do you simply not like anyone who doesn't look like you? And if that is the case, isn't that a sort of incestuous? Do you often have candlelight dinners for one?
Right, and no Gay ever got married and had kids.
I was just wondering if this was a fashion statement or if they really all seem to be leaning towards lesbianism.
So, not only do you have something against people who look gay (whether or not they really are), you also have an issue with actual gay people, gay married people, married people who look gay but really aren't, and also, strangely enough, with fashion people. Interesting. How long have you experienced these delusions of "better than thou"? are there any other people you don't like? Or do you simply not like anyone who doesn't look like you? And if that is the case, isn't that a sort of incestuous? Do you often have candlelight dinners for one?
Actually seeing something and commenting on the possibility shouldn't be grounds for a personal attack.
I didn't say I don't like lesbians. My God Damned sister is one. I love her as much as the rest of my brothers and sisters. We've discussed it. She hates assholes that think we cannot notice the obvious as much as I do.
So, not only do you have something against people who look gay (whether or not they really are), you also have an issue with actual gay people, gay married people, married people who look gay but really aren't, and also, strangely enough, with fashion people. Interesting. How long have you experienced these delusions of "better than thou"? are there any other people you don't like? Or do you simply not like anyone who doesn't look like you? And if that is the case, isn't that a sort of incestuous? Do you often have candlelight dinners for one?
Actually seeing something and commenting on the possibility shouldn't be grounds for a personal attack.
I didn't say I don't like lesbians. My God Damned sister is one. I love her as much as the rest of my brothers and sisters. We've discussed it. She hates assholes that think we cannot notice the obvious as much as I do.
And neither should "appearing to be gay, whatever that means" be grounds for questioning whether or not someone actually IS gay. As I said, who the fuck cares? If she does her job, that's all that matters.
Actually seeing something and commenting on the possibility shouldn't be grounds for a personal attack.
I didn't say I don't like lesbians. My God Damned sister is one. I love her as much as the rest of my brothers and sisters. We've discussed it. She hates assholes that think we cannot notice the obvious as much as I do.
And neither should "appearing to be gay, whatever that means" be grounds for questioning whether or not someone actually IS gay. As I said, who the fuck cares? If she does her job, that's all that matters.
True. But what is her job? I would think that the EPA should be run by serious people, not radicals. She has a degree in social anthropology. What does that have to do with the EPA? You would think that someone with a more rounded background would be a better choice. Instead Obama picks these philosophical dunderheads that have little or no scientific background or economic background.
Social anthropology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And appearing gay is pretty self-explanatory.
And neither should "appearing to be gay, whatever that means" be grounds for questioning whether or not someone actually IS gay. As I said, who the fuck cares? If she does her job, that's all that matters.
True. But what is her job? I would think that the EPA should be run by serious people, not radicals. She has a degree in social anthropology. What does that have to do with the EPA? You would think that someone with a more rounded background would be a better choice. Instead Obama picks these philosophical dunderheads that have little or no scientific background or economic background.
Social anthropology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
And appearing gay is pretty self-explanatory.
I majored in anthropology for four years before I switched majors to geology. I worked as an environmental consultant for 15 years, including on superfund sites. She was assistant director of the EPA before she became director. And worked as an EPA enforcer for four years before she became a private consultant and advisor to the EPA, and has worked in this field for most of her adult life. I think that more than qualifies her for the job. And so does Congress. Get over it.
Why waste time watching a video of a Fox News program? We know the conclusion before it starts. Sometime I wounder if Fox News has done a piece that was really favorable to the Democrats. Of course that would wouldn't be "fair and balanced".
The agenda to be discussed at the upcoming UN Conference on “Sustainable Development” is outlined in its published report entitled, “Working Towards a Balanced and Inclusive Green Economy: A United Nations System-wide Perspective.”
The report states, “Transitioning to a green economy requires a fundamental shift in the way we think and act.” It calls for increased “education,” information, and “awareness” efforts to help “change individual and collective behavior” in lifestyles as well as consumption and production patterns. The agenda will necessitate “a serious rethinking of lifestyles in developed countries."
Thursday, 31 May 2012 09:42
UN Plans to Expand Its Environmental Agency
Written by Raven Clabough
UN Plans to Expand Its Environmental Agency
When Hussein named Uncle Janet to head DHS I knew we were fcked. And not in a good way...
Let’s get back on track with Gina McCarthy.
The EPA “enforces” the Clean Air Act. As far as I know that was the first time a bureaucracy told Americans what to do. The Affordable Care Act is following in the EPA’s footsteps.
Let’s get back on track with Gina McCarthy.
Prior to the EPA/Clean Air Act a suspected lawbreaker was arrested and given a day in court. The EPA circumvented the system. The EPA can fine, tax, shutdown, control an individual’s private property and so on. Former EPA administrator, Lisa Jackson, actually claimed taxing authority.
Let’s get back on track with Gina McCarthy.
Back in early April 2010, EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson announced that she would tax industries to enforce the Clean Air Act. The question is: Where did a bureaucrat get the authority to tax anyone? Certainly not from the Constitution. No police chief in this country can go to a local business, or an individual, suspected of breaking a law and impose a tax. Yet Jackson is doing just that. No arrests for breaking the law, no day in court for the accused, just the EPA —— in the person of Lisa P. Jackson —— ordering a private business to pay a tax. I will not be surprised if some of those tax dollars find their way to the United Nations in a backdoor approach to giving the UN taxing authority over the American people.
Here’s the core problem:
Once the EPA was given the authority to bypass traditional law enforcement, the courts, and the Constitution, in order to enforce the Clean Air Act
it was only a matter of time before people like Lisa Jackson, and now Gina McCarthy, gained control of the machinery.
Jackson was bad enough, but one look at McCarthy should tell you that she is an angry little freak who finally has the authority to tell Americans what to do.
In a society of free people EMPLOYERS pay people to do their bidding.
Not so with the EPA. They are all parasites living on tax dollars telling their EMPLOYERS what to do.
It’s like the janitor telling the CEO of a large company what to do. Basically, it’s slavery when you can order anyone about without paying them.
Finally, liberals hated J. Edger Hoover with a passion even though he never did anything against this country or the American people.
On the other hand liberals love garbage like Gina McCarthy even though she harms private sector Americans every chance she gets while betraying the country in order to implement the UN’s agenda.
The report states, “Transitioning to a green economy requires a fundamental shift in the way we think and act.” It calls for increased “education,” information, and “awareness” efforts to help “change individual and collective behavior” in lifestyles as well as consumption and production patterns. The agenda will necessitate “a serious rethinking of lifestyles in developed countries."
And yet you apparently enjoy a large wall of water being shoved up yer ass from time to time.Tell me.Is that a great way to be fcked. Never mind.I don't actually want to know.You Republicans have such silly fears, and yet don't quite comprehend that you aren't supposed to stick your finger in the light socket.
Given she didn't say that, you would either be the idiot in this case, or you're deliberately making crap up.
So, you might want to just go back to yelling that she looks gay. You were actually looking more sensible with that line of attack.
When Hussein named Uncle Janet to head DHS I knew we were fcked. And not in a good way...
And yet you apparently enjoy a large wall of water being shoved up yer ass from time to time. Tell me. Is that a great way to be fcked? Never mind. I don't actually want to know. You Republicans have such silly fears, and yet don't quite comprehend that you aren't supposed to stick your finger in the light socket.