NATO warns of Iran nuclear domino, says back Obama

Discussion in 'Iran' started by toomuchtime_, Jan 26, 2009.

  1. toomuchtime_
    Online

    toomuchtime_ Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,507
    Thanks Received:
    706
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,948
    BRUSSELS, Jan 26 (Reuters) - NATO urged its members on Monday to do more to help new U.S. President Barack Obama tackle the growing threats of terrorism, weapons of mass destruction and failed states.

    Alliance Secretary-General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer highlighted nuclear proliferation in North Korea and Iran, warning that the latter was threatening to provoke "a nuclear domino effect" in the Middle East.

    "The problems we face today have not magically gone away," he said in a speech to a Brussels think-tank, stressing the need for greater Euro-Atlantic cooperation under the new U.S. administration.

    "The world is not suddenly more peaceful," he said.

    "International terrorism, the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the growing numbers of failing states are not just the obsession of a few," he said.

    De Hoop Scheffer said urgent attention needed to be paid to South Asia and said an victory for extremism in Afghanistan and Pakistan would be "a disaster for international security".

    "The nuclear proliferation regime is eroding before us," he added. "North Korea is challenging the balance of power in Asia and Iran is threatening to provoke a nuclear domino effect in the Middle East."

    In Afghanistan, a regional approach was needed, he said, with discussions involving all regional players -- Pakistan, India, China, Russia, and also Iran.

    Referring to U.S. plans to increase troops numbers in Afghanistan, De Hoop Scheffer said Europe had to do its bit.

    "I cannot accept that the U.S. has to do all the heavy lifting...Europe too has to step up -- with more forces and when that is not forthcoming, more on the civilian side," he said.


    EUROPEAN RESPONSE

    De Hoop Scheffer said that when Washington called on Europe for help, the Europeans had to respond in a united way -- with the resources to match. It could not leave it to Obama to make all the running and offer all the concessions.

    "If the Europeans expect that the United States will close Guantanamo, sign up to climate change treaties, accept EU leadership on key issues, but provide nothing more in return, for example in Afghanistan, than encouragement -- they should think again. It simply won't work like that."

    De Hoop Scheffer reiterated NATO calls for European countries to drop restrictions on use of troops in combat, and for better coordination of the military and development efforts.

    He also called for a stepped up focus on Central Asia and the Caucasus region, citing political, security and energy issues. The alliance should consider its role in ensuring security of energy supply "much more seriously", he said.

    Despite times of economic hardship, Europe needed to increase its security capabilities to make it a more effective partner of the United States.

    "As America remains prepared to lead, it will not be able to lead alone. Europe should be both willing and able to be a partner that the new American administration is looking for." (Editing by Jon Boyle)


    NATO warns of Iran nuclear domino, says back Obama | Reuters
     
  2. dilloduck
    Offline

    dilloduck Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    53,240
    Thanks Received:
    5,552
    Trophy Points:
    1,850
    Location:
    Austin, TX
    Ratings:
    +6,403
    How nice of the EU to figure this out---finally.
     
  3. Paulie
    Offline

    Paulie Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    31,522
    Thanks Received:
    4,847
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +15,350
    Yeah yeah.. :rolleyes:

    One thread from you says they're running out of uranium, which serves to lessen the overall perception that they're immediately dangerous, but now you post this one which ENHANCES the perception of immediate danger.

    Which is it, dude? Are they going to nuke everyone tomorrow, or are they probably incapable of anything in the near future because of a shortage of nuclear material?

    You're confusing, and unnecessarily SCARING, the shit out of people here. Make up your fucking mind.
     
  4. Kevin_Kennedy
    Offline

    Kevin_Kennedy Defend Liberty

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    17,590
    Thanks Received:
    1,581
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +2,027
    Good point.
     
  5. toomuchtime_
    Online

    toomuchtime_ Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,507
    Thanks Received:
    706
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,948
    Sorry, I didn't mean to scare the shit out of you. Iran's nuclear program is obviously of concern to the nations in the region and the EU as well as the US, and the alleged shortage of uranium is an obstacle to that program at this time, but if the present efforts of the EU to persuade uranium producers not to sell raw uranium to Iran should fail, that will no longer be an obstacle.

    If you find this too confusing or too frightening, perhaps you should stop reading this stuff. Maybe you could find something less frightening in the Humor forum.
     
  6. Paulie
    Offline

    Paulie Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2007
    Messages:
    31,522
    Thanks Received:
    4,847
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +15,350
    It's not me you're scaring. If I die tomorrow in a nuke blast, so be it. I don't live my life in that kind of unfounded fear. But there's people who are afraid of Iran, and you're only making their fear worse by providing them a roller coaster ride of worry when you post so many contradicting threads about their supposed nuclear capabilities and ambitions.

    They're either an immediate threat, or they're running out of uranium which makes them NOT an immediate threat. You can't have it both ways.
     
  7. toomuchtime_
    Online

    toomuchtime_ Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,507
    Thanks Received:
    706
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Ratings:
    +1,948
    Now you're just being argumentative for no reason at all. Nothing I posted suggested Iran posed an immediate nuclear threat. If you decide to stay on topic in the future, let me know.
     

Share This Page