Bass v 2.0
Biblical Warrior For God.
White people like stuff like this, just as the old segregationists of the deep south hated and feared the NAACP, the responses of some posters here are great throwbacks to the past.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
White people like stuff like this, just as the old segregationists of the deep south hated and feared the NAACP, the responses of some posters here are great throwbacks to the past.
Do you even pay attention to the questions you ask? No swing, no miss, just your hate fueled illogical posting catching up with you. "a governor" implies "any governor," so back peddle and get all your ducks and beer cans lined up, and play again.
What part of "the grievance wasn't the governor not addressing a group" are you failing to grasp here?
I guess you still haven't read the link I provide. <sigh> lead a horse to water but can't make him think....................
"Specifically, the NAACP event involved meeting with black prisoners at the state prison." That is a group, to be addressed, about MLK, do you not understand?
The only discrimination involved was the NAACP's for wanting the governor to visit ONLY black prisoners.Can you point out what exactly is unconstitutional about your whiny leftist butthurt?No Ollie, not at all. We have a representative government, and I think the governor is aware of that. But I want to see it before the Supreme Court, because the governor won't get away with his choice of actions or words. He might think he is racking points up with someone, but it will back fire on him, just like his slanderous words to Obama. I hate to see a grown man grovel at every turn.
Well, looks like I don't have to Dave, because you already lost the debate by making a personal attack. That according to one of your own buddies rules.
asterism
Congress != Progress
Member #24388
"It seems you have conceded your point since you went with the personal attack."
http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...lls-naacp-to-kiss-his-butt-3.html#post3213247
Now I point out earlier that this is contingent on further Governor actions, that of entertaining another group with privilege, but knowing the NAACP, it would be a discrimination suit based on color.
Do you think the NAACP is living up to Dr. King's dream where men are judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character?Do you even pay attention to the questions you ask? No swing, no miss, just your hate fueled illogical posting catching up with you. "a governor" implies "any governor," so back peddle and get all your ducks and beer cans lined up, and play again.
What part of "the grievance wasn't the governor not addressing a group" are you failing to grasp here?
I guess you still haven't read the link I provide. <sigh> lead a horse to water but can't make him think....................
"Specifically, the NAACP event involved meeting with black prisoners at the state prison." That is a group, to be addressed, about MLK, do you not understand?
About time people started standing up to special interest groups.
I bet someone tries to make this about race.....
Hey rdean, do you know that the governor has a black son?
I knew racists would be out in spades for this thread..... And sure enough there are already several here.
Do you think the NAACP is living up to Dr. King's dream where men are judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character?What part of "the grievance wasn't the governor not addressing a group" are you failing to grasp here?
I guess you still haven't read the link I provide. <sigh> lead a horse to water but can't make him think....................
"Specifically, the NAACP event involved meeting with black prisoners at the state prison." That is a group, to be addressed, about MLK, do you not understand?
I don't.
The only discrimination involved was the NAACP's for wanting the governor to visit ONLY black prisoners.Can you point out what exactly is unconstitutional about your whiny leftist butthurt?
Well, looks like I don't have to Dave, because you already lost the debate by making a personal attack. That according to one of your own buddies rules.
asterism
Congress != Progress
Member #24388
"It seems you have conceded your point since you went with the personal attack."
http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...lls-naacp-to-kiss-his-butt-3.html#post3213247
Now I point out earlier that this is contingent on further Governor actions, that of entertaining another group with privilege, but knowing the NAACP, it would be a discrimination suit based on color.
Hey rdean, do you know that the governor has a black son?
I knew racists would be out in spades for this thread..... And sure enough there are already several here.
The governor has a "black" son. OK, what's the point?
Hey rdean, do you know that the governor has a black son?
I knew racists would be out in spades for this thread..... And sure enough there are already several here.
The governor has a "black" son. OK, what's the point?
Ahh, but both have to do with addressing a group. This is the kind of ignorance I get, and then they still lack the snaps to comprehend such a simple connection, and think they somehow spoofed me. If they only knew what fools they make themselves out to be, I wonder if they would still play?
they are 2 different situations......one has too do with hiring practices......the other was a meeting.....and you never addressed this.......
your post........
If they have a grievance and the governor refuses to address it, the group would have the case to go to court. He has to represent all people in his state, not just the chosen ones. And there are all kinds of groups, so if he addresses just one group, he is showing prejudice.
your saying he has to represent ALL the people in his State,not just CHOSEN ones....yet you want him to meet just the ones CHOSEN by a special interest group.....and then you say if he does indeed meet with just ONE group..... he is showing prejudice. ...........and yet the Gov. is trying to do what you say he should be doing,meet with EVERYONE,not just a special group....and yet your calling the guy a piece of shit.....you wanna explain this?.....
Yes, if you don't take it out of context, and go back and read this thread from the front to the back, because I didn't call a guy a "piece of shit" anywhere in this thread, and since you lied about that, I assume you lied about everything else. But you will find your answer in this thread addressed to Dave who already asked the same Q.
As long as black people are concentrating on race, they're not living up to Dr. King's dream.Do you think the NAACP is living up to Dr. King's dream where men are judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character?
I guess you still haven't read the link I provide. <sigh> lead a horse to water but can't make him think....................
"Specifically, the NAACP event involved meeting with black prisoners at the state prison." That is a group, to be addressed, about MLK, do you not understand?
I don't.
And how would you know that? Apparently you know nothing about MLK, the NAACP is pretty much doing things King has done and or would do if he were alive, unlike Republitards who lie and say King was a Republican to draw more blacks in their ranks. The TeaBaggers and Republitards are certainly not living up to King's dream.
Then perhaps they shouldn't break the law.The only discrimination involved was the NAACP's for wanting the governor to visit ONLY black prisoners.Well, looks like I don't have to Dave, because you already lost the debate by making a personal attack. That according to one of your own buddies rules.
asterism
Congress != Progress
Member #24388
"It seems you have conceded your point since you went with the personal attack."
http://www.usmessageboard.com/polit...lls-naacp-to-kiss-his-butt-3.html#post3213247
Now I point out earlier that this is contingent on further Governor actions, that of entertaining another group with privilege, but knowing the NAACP, it would be a discrimination suit based on color.
Explain how that's racist. Black prisoners have for years been complaining about inhumane treatment and racism.
And how would you know that? Apparently you know nothing about MLK, the NAACP is pretty much doing things King has done and or would do if he were alive, unlike Republitards who lie and say King was a Republican to draw more blacks in their ranks. The TeaBaggers and Republitards are certainly not living up to King's dream.
As long as black people are concentrating on race, they're not living up to Dr. King's dream.Do you think the NAACP is living up to Dr. King's dream where men are judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character?
I don't.
And how would you know that? Apparently you know nothing about MLK, the NAACP is pretty much doing things King has done and or would do if he were alive, unlike Republitards who lie and say King was a Republican to draw more blacks in their ranks. The TeaBaggers and Republitards are certainly not living up to King's dream.
Your lie about conservatives is just that: A lie. Conservatives judge people by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. It's the left that does the opposite.