What's Obama' exit strategy?
What's the time-line for cessation of hostilities?
What constitutes victory?
It's not only Obama, it's the world. But you knew that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What's Obama' exit strategy?
What's the time-line for cessation of hostilities?
What constitutes victory?
Nader may be cuckoo... but he is certainly a liberal.Good to see at least SOME liberals have a political spine.
He isn't a Liberal, he's an opportunist. Like Trump. They'll probably both run now and decide their party later..
According to the guy who, we are SO often told, used to be a professor of Constitutional law:
-The ObamaThe President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.
As Commander-in-Chief, the President does have a duty to protect and defend the United States. In instances of self-defense, the President would be within his constitutional authority to act before advising Congress or seeking its consent.
Obama on presidential war-making powers - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com
It appears it would help --you-- quite a lot.or perhaps this book might help?
What's Obama' exit strategy?
What's the time-line for cessation of hostilities?
What constitutes victory?
It's not only Obama, it's the world. But you knew that.
What's Obama' exit strategy?
What's the time-line for cessation of hostilities?
What constitutes victory?
It's not only Obama, it's the world. But you knew that.
It's not the world.... that's a stretch.
Wait... are you arging that The Obama, The Constitutional Professor, is wrong about the Constitution?The problem is that you're confusing opinion and commentary with actual study and looking at one document without looking at the War Powers Act.
This claim is not supprted by -anything- you have -ever- posted here.As for me, I aced con law and passed two bar exams. I figure i did ok.
According to the guy who, we are SO often told, used to be a professor of Constitutional law:May I suggest a course in Constitutional law?This is a criminal use of force. The Constitution authorizes military for the defense of the United States, and this isn't it. Congress has no basis to declare war for that reason either. There is no Constitutional authority for our involvement in this no matter how you slice it.
-The ObamaThe President does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation.
As Commander-in-Chief, the President does have a duty to protect and defend the United States. In instances of self-defense, the President would be within his constitutional authority to act before advising Congress or seeking its consent.
Obama on presidential war-making powers - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com
It appears it would help --you-- quite a lot.or perhaps this book might help?
Wait... are you arging that The Obama, The Constitutional Professor, is wrong about the Constitution?The problem is that you're confusing opinion and commentary with actual study and looking at one document without looking at the War Powers Act.
This claim is not supprted by -anything- you have -ever- posted here.As for me, I aced con law and passed two bar exams. I figure i did ok.
Thus, I call this a lie.
Wait... are you arging that The Obama, The Constitutional Professor, is wrong about the Constitution?The problem is that you're confusing opinion and commentary with actual study and looking at one document without looking at the War Powers Act.
This claim is not supprted by -anything- you have -ever- posted here.As for me, I aced con law and passed two bar exams. I figure i did ok.
Thus, I call this a lie.
my billable hours say otherwise.
and i really truly and without equivocation couldn't care less what subliterate rightwingnuts think.
i'm funny that way.
You did not answer the question:my billable hours say otherwise.Wait... are you arging that The Obama, The Constitutional Professor, is wrong about the Constitution?The problem is that you're confusing opinion and commentary with actual study and looking at one document without looking at the War Powers Act.
This claim is not supprted by -anything- you have -ever- posted here.As for me, I aced con law and passed two bar exams. I figure i did ok.
Thus, I call this a lie.
Janitors are paid hourly...Wait... are you arging that The Obama, The Constitutional Professor, is wrong about the Constitution?
This claim is not supprted by -anything- you have -ever- posted here.
Thus, I call this a lie.
my billable hours say otherwise.
and i really truly and without equivocation couldn't care less what subliterate rightwingnuts think.
i'm funny that way.
you are funny sometimes and i'm guessing your billables aren't related to interpreting the constitution. LOL
There's a half-way decent chance they won't lose this one.It's a sight to behold watching France get their war on.
lately i think that obama doesn't really take the job seriously. in fact i think he's just there for the ride, and to enjoy the trappings of royalty, do a little preaching to the world. he seems awefully lazy to me. i don't care if he can eat fifty eggs or not. he's enchanted with the sound of his own voice.
Wait... are you arging that The Obama, The Constitutional Professor, is wrong about the Constitution?
This claim is not supprted by -anything- you have -ever- posted here.
Thus, I call this a lie.
my billable hours say otherwise.
and i really truly and without equivocation couldn't care less what subliterate rightwingnuts think.
i'm funny that way.
you are funny sometimes and i'm guessing your billables aren't related to interpreting the constitution. LOL unless your the invisible 10th member of the supremes. don't feel badly, i'm not sure obama knows the constitution that well.
Obama the Global Military Expansionist (His Words) | Young Americans for Liberty
I wonder if that has anything to do with the amount of money the richest 1% of Americans (and others) earn from wars they seldom get close to?Nader's done alot of good. Many of the consumer protections we now enjoy are due to Nader. That said he's as loony as Ron Paul.
Good point, anyone who's anti-war in 2011 will now and forever in the future be deemed as loony.
To be a mainstream politician in america today you have to be pro-war, as well as to be a mainstream voter.
Claiming that "innocents are being slaughtered" in Afghanistan and beyond, former presidential candidate Ralph Nader called for impeaching President Obama for committing war crimes.
"Why don't we say what's on the minds of many legal experts; that the Obama administration is committing war crimes and if Bush should have been impeached, Obama should be impeached,.."
The Hill...
Oh, please. Who in the hell cares what Ralph Nader thinks???
you beat me to it. i, personally, couldn't care less what that megalomanic thinks.