Contessa_Sharra
Searcher for Accuracy
- Apr 27, 2008
- 1,639
- 149
- 48
She had complications during pregnancy and the MD taking care of her suggested she abort her baby. Which she did not.
Wasn't it FoF that promoted the backstory, made sure it got out as an "abortion" thing?
I think the term "losing the baby" is entirely disingenuous in this case, as she was never in danger of "losing" him, there was no imminent miscarriage and heroic measures were there?
Nope, only a woman who CHOSE not to act on certain medical advice. SHE had a choice, SHE made a choice. BIG FUCKING DEAL, but dishonesty from FoF.
So, ultimately, it was a Pro-Choice Ad.
I would think, although I KNOW that was not what Focus on the Family intended it to be.
Lots and lots of women choose to go against medical advice, and choose to try to carry a child to term. Sometimes it is a herioc thing, and sometimes everything goes along quite normally..... and all is well.