And there are lifelong smokers who never develop lung cancer. Are you suggesting that the anomalous justifies the opposite trend?Some of the most accomplished people in the world came from shitty backgrounds.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And there are lifelong smokers who never develop lung cancer. Are you suggesting that the anomalous justifies the opposite trend?Some of the most accomplished people in the world came from shitty backgrounds.
"My abortion was the best decision I ever made. It was an act of self love."
Like people who buy guns?Glad an actually living and breathing person exercised a right and is doing well
And there are lifelong smokers who never develop lung cancer. Are you suggesting that the anomalous justifies the opposite trend?
Perhaps she shouldnt have let that original "thing" inside her to begin with.I love myself for killing that thing inside of me. Argh!
Activist describes her abortion as 'self-love' in wake of Roe reversal
Activist describes her abortion as ‘self-love’ in wake of Roe reversal - Washington Examiner
An activist from an organization that promotes abortion access said terminating her pregnancy "was an act of self-love" during an appearance in front of the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday. Sarah Lopez, a "storyteller" from We Testify, described abortion as "healthcare" and said her...www.washingtonexaminer.com
"Thou shalt not kill" is pretty good religious doctrine for a civil society.What gives you the right to force other people to live by your religious doctrine?
Not all moral issues are religious.Gods have nothing to do with it.
And religion has no place in law or government.
What gives you the right to force other people to live by your religious doctrine?
I don't subscribe to any religion.I am invoking your religion.
Without God, we are bags of stardust. Who cares?
And yet people have always killed people and will always kill people"Thou shalt not kill" is pretty good religious doctrine for a civil society.
And you have no right to force people to live by your moral codesNot all moral issues are religious.
No I don;t assume either wayNo one asserts that. Instead, you’re pretending that they’re all bad.
Making something illegal discourages it, but it doesn't eliminate it. Like a border wall discourages illegal immigration, but won't entirely eliminate it.And yet people have always killed people and will always kill people
We just have a million ways to rationalize it
The question is should abortion be illegal.Making something illegal discourages it, but it doesn't eliminate it. Like a border wall discourages illegal immigration, but won't entirely eliminate it.
I don’t force anyone to do anything that’s doesn’t impact me.And you have no right to force people to live by your moral codes
Actually, we went on a tangent regarding whether religious doctrine should be a basis for law. I suggested that "thou shalt not kill" was a pretty good one to base a law upon. Then you took the binary route of implying that if a law doesn't totally eliminate a behavior, it's worthless. I just illustrated that's the argument the left uses regarding border walls.The question is should abortion be illegal.
Never said laws were worthlessActually, we went on a tangent regarding whether religious doctrine should be a basis for law. I suggested that "thou shalt not kill" was a pretty good one to base a law upon. Then you took the binary route of implying that if a law doesn't totally eliminate a behavior, it's worthless. I just illustrated that's the argument the left uses regarding border walls.
Take your semantic BS elsewhere. Thinking adults know exactly what you did here:Never said laws were worthless
All I did was state the truthTake your semantic BS elsewhere. Thinking adults know exactly what you did here:
View attachment 671169
As did I. Glad we cleared that up.All I did was state the truth