Musk threatens to sue hate speech monitor for pointing out hate speech on X

It's called free speech. That is what you are against. You want one point of view allowed to be expressed, and any other point of view repressed.
If you can't handle someone else's opinion, then it's good that you left the platform...
No, X has become a room for racist and hate mongers. That is why it is bleeding money and advertisers are running from it.
 
Yet another totally opposite and backwards post by Mrs Jones, the queen of deception and deflection.
Musk is at complete liberty to accommodate rightwing hate speech, no one seeks to stop him.

Other social media that elect to not accommodate rightwing hate speech are likewise at liberty to do so – and by doing so do not ‘violate’ the free speech of racist, bigoted conservatives.
 
Musk is at complete liberty to accommodate rightwing hate speech, no one seeks to stop him.

Other social media that elect to not accommodate rightwing hate speech are likewise at liberty to do so – and by doing so do not ‘violate’ the free speech of racist, bigoted conservatives.
You just did it again!
Twitter was full of only hate and banned free speech before Musk wrestled it away fom the Reich brownshirts.
And again, the racist bigoted group you talk about is represented by when you look into a mirror.
 
You just did it again!
Twitter was full of only hate and banned free speech before Musk wrestled it away fom the Reich brownshirts.
And again, the racist bigoted group you talk about is represented by when you look into a mirror.
And advertisers and private persons are at liberty to leave Twitter because they don’t want to be associated with rightwing hate speech, misinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies.
 

Musk has turned X into a hate speech paradise. And he wonders why advertisers are fleeing the platform?
He complied with the government's censorship rules which we now find out is illegal. So why do you think that is?
 
Musk is at complete liberty to accommodate rightwing hate speech, no one seeks to stop him.

Other social media that elect to not accommodate rightwing hate speech are likewise at liberty to do so – and by doing so do not ‘violate’ the free speech of racist, bigoted conservatives.
Yup, and the rich bully is going to lose his 44 Billion...cause no one wants to advertise on a hate site.
 
You been on Mars. trump has been trying to destroy votes for nearly three years. He is a pathological liar.

Specifically, you wrote;

you wanted a level playing field when trump tried to take away people's votes.

What does your opinion on how Trump behaves during an election, have to do, with the staff here, trying to let all voices be heard?

Now bear in mind. . . at the time of the election, and J6, I was not even a member of the staff. I didn't vote for Trump, and I warned many of my friends who love Trump, not to go to protest to those various "Rally for the Republic," election rally's, because I knew from those fishy pallets of bricks, that mysteriously showed up at those garbage BLM protests, that they were not safe places to be, IMO.

. . with that said, what does ANYTHING Trump did or said, have to do, with the policies and rules, of USMB providing a level and equal space for discussion for everyone?

:dunno:
 
And advertisers and private persons are at liberty to leave Twitter because they don’t want to be associated with rightwing hate speech, misinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies.
Again........substitute leftist for rightwing and you have an honest post.
You are one backwards brownshirt Mrs Jones.
 
Musk is at complete liberty to accommodate rightwing hate speech, no one seeks to stop him.

Other social media that elect to not accommodate rightwing hate speech are likewise at liberty to do so – and by doing so do not ‘violate’ the free speech of racist, bigoted conservatives.
And leftist for the first rightwing, and Reich Brownshirt for the second rightwing and Mrs Jones has herself another true post.
You are one confused kook Mrs Jones.
 
Define "hate speech." The problem is the left tends to label anything they don't agree with as "hate speech."
You don't know how to click a link? 🙄


And how are you automatically assuming that a British research nonprofit is "the left"?
 
until the Right found one thing to hate
Another dope who would rather talk out his ass than click a link.

The Right always have plenty of things to hate, even Barbie.

Twitter failed to act on tweets containing racist, homophobic, neo-Nazi, antisemitic or conspiracy content posted in the last month, including tweets claiming that:

  • “The black culture has done more damage [than] the klan ever did”
  • “The Jewish Mafia wants to replace us all with brown people”
  • “Trannies are pedophiles”
  • “Diversity is a codeword for White Genocide”
  • “Hitler was right”, accompanied by a montage of the former dictator
  • Black people belong “locked in cages at the zoo”
  • LGBTQ+ rights activists need “IRON IN THEIR DIET. Preferably from a #AFiringSquad”
Twitter failed to act despite the fact that the tweets surfaced by the Center clearly violate the platform’s policies against hateful conduct, which bans abuse on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation and gender identity.

Twitter’s lack of responsibility for removing hate speech is unsurprising. Previous studies from CCDH have looked into anti-Jewish and anti-Muslim hate on Twitter, finding that the platform had failed to act on 89% and 97% of posts, respectively.
 

Forum List

Back
Top