Mueller Indicts 13 Russian Nationals For Election Meddling

"If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich

Actually, a couple of them showed up, and now he's scrambling to try to build a case against them. Also, the discovery could reveal national secrets that should

not be. He really stepped in a pile of dog poo with that.

His case against Manafort is from something 10 years back, wholly unconnected with the 2016 campaign. Is there no statute of limitations? Is there no limit to the scope of Mueller's investigation? I thought Special Counsels were very limited.
 
"If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich
/-----/ And it gives the Libtard Moonbats something to attack Trump with when they brag about all the Russian indictments as proof Trump colluded.
upload_2018-7-15_8-23-43.jpeg
 
"If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich
/-----/ And it gives the Libtard Moonbats something to attack Trump with when they brag about all the Russian indictments as proof Trump colluded.
View attachment 204913

That's an insult to bats. Bats are kinda cute, really.
 
Oh, this is going to be interesting.

Fake news is reporting Rosenstein is going to announce these charges today.

I can't wait to see what these charges are. So now buying adds disparaging Hillaryous is now a crime. Free speech unless you're Russian.

Rosenstein stated no person contacted by Russians knew they were being contacted by Russians who were trying to influence the election.

Go pound sand, libtardos, if they had any thing on Trump they'd have announced it.

10yhwfp.jpg
 
Proof you've got no retort and are down to just name calling.
Whether we did it to the Russians or not is immaterial. We did it to others and that matters. So we can't bitch when someone does it to us.

What did the Russians even "do to us"?
Spend a few thousand on Facebook ads?
Post some memes on Facebook?

I didn't realize our democracy was so fragile that it could be broken so easily...........

rightwingers seem to have had a change of heart on Russia, because Orange One told them sand tastes great!

head-in-the-sand.jpg



Now just in case you don't like the gritty texture:

Russian troll farm operations had a budget of million+ dollars a month.
Mueller charges 13 Russians with interfering in US election to help Trump

Russians hacked political organizations, stole and distributed materials.
2016 Election Hacking Fast Facts - CNN

Russians hacked election databases and American infrastructure:
Russia Hacked U.S. Power Grid — So What Will The Trump Administration Do About It?

Nah, Russia was our enemy when Hillary and Obama were fellating Putin, and they're our enemy now.

It is hilarious that until the Clinton campaign fabricated them as an excuse for her loss, all the Dems
were fellating him as well.

The 80s called, they want their foreign policy back.......DERP!!!

Like the dodging pussy you are, sarcasm is all you ever got.

Russia was never our enemy. ISIS is our enemy, Japan and Germany WERE our enemies in WW2.

Russia was, and is, our ADVERSARY.

I remember reading that someplace else..posted by a "poluptroon" or something like that.

It is the truth.
 
Oh, this is going to be interesting.

Fake news is reporting Rosenstein is going to announce these charges today.

I can't wait to see what these charges are. So now buying adds disparaging Hillaryous is now a crime. Free speech unless you're Russian.

Rosenstein stated no person contacted by Russians knew they were being contacted by Russians who were trying to influence the election.

Go pound sand, libtardos, if they had any thing on Trump they'd have announced it.

10yhwfp.jpg
/----/
upload_2018-7-15_8-37-45.jpeg
upload_2018-7-15_8-37-55.jpeg
 
"If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich
The indictment comes from a grand jury.
Apparently, you need grand jury 101 lesson.
 
"If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich
The indictment comes from a grand jury.
Apparently, you need grand jury 101 lesson.
/——/ There is no Grand Jury involved in the Muller indictment. Where did you get that from?
New York Times: WASHINGTON — The special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election issued an indictment of 12 Russian intelligence officers on Friday in the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton presidential campaign. The indictment came only three days before President Trump was planning to meet with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia in Helsinki, Finland.
 
"If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich

Actually, a couple of them showed up, and now he's scrambling to try to build a case against them. Also, the discovery could reveal national secrets that should

not be. He really stepped in a pile of dog poo with that.

His case against Manafort is from something 10 years back, wholly unconnected with the 2016 campaign. Is there no statute of limitations? Is there no limit to the scope of Mueller's investigation? I thought Special Counsels were very limited.
He's simply informing us, on what he has found out and happened...

Since congress never bothered to truly investigate, with live hearings on it, like the honest Republicans did with the Watergate break in....

it is the only way for the Public to know what is going on....

the Grand Jury, in this case, advised to indict them....Mueller presented his case to do such, to them, and they decide if charges are warranted, according to our Laws.
 
"If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich

Actually, a couple of them showed up, and now he's scrambling to try to build a case against them. Also, the discovery could reveal national secrets that should

not be. He really stepped in a pile of dog poo with that.

His case against Manafort is from something 10 years back, wholly unconnected with the 2016 campaign. Is there no statute of limitations? Is there no limit to the scope of Mueller's investigation? I thought Special Counsels were very limited.
He's simply informing us, on what he has found out and happened...

Since congress never bothered to truly investigate, with live hearings on it, like the honest Republicans did with the Watergate break in....

it is the only way for the Public to know what is going on....

the Grand Jury, in this case, advised to indict them....Mueller presented his case to do such, to them, and they decide if charges are warranted, according to our Laws.

You know that's not going to happen in double ways, right?

A) He doesn't have sufficient proof.


B) The discovery could reveal the method in which he got his information.

Moreso B than A, but whatcha gonna do? :dunno:

The Russians want him to proceed so they can learn how to avoid being caught next time.
 
"If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich

Actually, a couple of them showed up, and now he's scrambling to try to build a case against them. Also, the discovery could reveal national secrets that should

not be. He really stepped in a pile of dog poo with that.

His case against Manafort is from something 10 years back, wholly unconnected with the 2016 campaign. Is there no statute of limitations? Is there no limit to the scope of Mueller's investigation? I thought Special Counsels were very limited.
He's simply informing us, on what he has found out and happened...

Since congress never bothered to truly investigate, with live hearings on it, like the honest Republicans did with the Watergate break in....

it is the only way for the Public to know what is going on....

the Grand Jury, in this case, advised to indict them....Mueller presented his case to do such, to them, and they decide if charges are warranted, according to our Laws.
/----/ There is no Grand Jury in the Muller investigation. Please provide a link that proves otherwise.
Mueller indicts 12 Russian intel officers for hacking Democrats - ABC ...
ABC News | Under Maintenance...
2 days ago - The indictment targets 12 Russian intelligence officers for engaging in a ... investigation into potential collusion between Russia and the Trump ...
 
"If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich

Actually, a couple of them showed up, and now he's scrambling to try to build a case against them. Also, the discovery could reveal national secrets that should

not be. He really stepped in a pile of dog poo with that.

His case against Manafort is from something 10 years back, wholly unconnected with the 2016 campaign. Is there no statute of limitations? Is there no limit to the scope of Mueller's investigation? I thought Special Counsels were very limited.
He's simply informing us, on what he has found out and happened...

Since congress never bothered to truly investigate, with live hearings on it, like the honest Republicans did with the Watergate break in....

it is the only way for the Public to know what is going on....

the Grand Jury, in this case, advised to indict them....Mueller presented his case to do such, to them, and they decide if charges are warranted, according to our Laws.




"You can fool all the people some of the time,
and some of the people all the time,
but you cannot fool all the people all the time."
Abraham Lincoln



It appears that Lincoln was referring to you in the second clause.
 
"If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich

Actually, a couple of them showed up, and now he's scrambling to try to build a case against them. Also, the discovery could reveal national secrets that should

not be. He really stepped in a pile of dog poo with that.

His case against Manafort is from something 10 years back, wholly unconnected with the 2016 campaign. Is there no statute of limitations? Is there no limit to the scope of Mueller's investigation? I thought Special Counsels were very limited.
He's simply informing us, on what he has found out and happened...

Since congress never bothered to truly investigate, with live hearings on it, like the honest Republicans did with the Watergate break in....

it is the only way for the Public to know what is going on....

the Grand Jury, in this case, advised to indict them....Mueller presented his case to do such, to them, and they decide if charges are warranted, according to our Laws.




"You can fool all the people some of the time,
and some of the people all the time,
but you cannot fool all the people all the time."
Abraham Lincoln



It appears that Lincoln was referring to you in the second clause.

That's about the best thing he ever said.
 
Last edited:
"If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich

Actually, a couple of them showed up, and now he's scrambling to try to build a case against them. Also, the discovery could reveal national secrets that should

not be. He really stepped in a pile of dog poo with that.

His case against Manafort is from something 10 years back, wholly unconnected with the 2016 campaign. Is there no statute of limitations? Is there no limit to the scope of Mueller's investigation? I thought Special Counsels were very limited.
He's simply informing us, on what he has found out and happened...

Since congress never bothered to truly investigate, with live hearings on it, like the honest Republicans did with the Watergate break in....

it is the only way for the Public to know what is going on....

the Grand Jury, in this case, advised to indict them....Mueller presented his case to do such, to them, and they decide if charges are warranted, according to our Laws.




"You can fool all the people some of the time,
and some of the people all the time,
but you cannot fool all the people all the time."
Abraham Lincoln



It appears that Lincoln was referring to you in the second clause.

That's about the best he ever said.


Now, now, M&M....

This was pretty good:
"I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel."
April 4, 1864
 
"If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich
The indictment comes from a grand jury.
Apparently, you need grand jury 101 lesson.
/——/ There is no Grand Jury involved in the Muller indictment. Where did you get that from?
New York Times: WASHINGTON — The special counsel investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election issued an indictment of 12 Russian intelligence officers on Friday in the hacking of the Democratic National Committee and the Clinton presidential campaign. The indictment came only three days before President Trump was planning to meet with President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia in Helsinki, Finland.
Indictments always originate from the grand jury. Its standard operating procedure. Read the story. It says grand jury "lodged" the indictments, and Mueller "obtained" them.

If the special counsel were able to unilaterally issue indictments, we'd be in serious shit due to total breakdown of law & order.
 
How many votes did the Russians switch?

We have no evidence that Russians hacked the DNC. We only have the claims of a sleazy company hired by the DNC. What the hell is "Clinton's Campaign Chair?" You mean Podesta? Julian Assange has said 1000 times that the Russians weren't the source of his emails. The Russians got voter information? How did that change any votes?

Why are you such a dimwit? Do you seriously not know to this day what they did?

Russians did not switch votes, they hacked our political organizations and conducted electioneering in attempts to sway the result of 2016 elections.

Assange has no credibility over American Intelligence.
Why is it ok for us to do it to them?

...wtf are you talking about?
We mess in other countries elections all the time and now we are going to cry when someone does it to us?

What illegal operations did US conduct in Russian election???

You rtwingers are too damn dumb to understand much of anything it seems. That’s why you keep eating Trump’s bullshit.


Proof Obama sent your money to defeat Bibi in Israel election

Total "rw" site. Don't care. The Kenyan Muslim did do that.
 
"If there’s one thing Special Counsel Robert Mueller is exceedingly good at it is indicting Russians over whom he has zero jurisdiction. Mueller had previously indicted 13 Russian individuals and companies, and Friday he added 12 more to the list.

It’s a neat little trick – bring charges against people you’ll never get in court, therefore you’ll never have to prove them. This allows Mueller and his team to say they’re “doing something,” that the American people are getting something for the millions his investigation has cost us, while not having to actually prove anything."
Derek Hunter - A Russian Ham Sandwich

Actually, a couple of them showed up, and now he's scrambling to try to build a case against them. Also, the discovery could reveal national secrets that should

not be. He really stepped in a pile of dog poo with that.

His case against Manafort is from something 10 years back, wholly unconnected with the 2016 campaign. Is there no statute of limitations? Is there no limit to the scope of Mueller's investigation? I thought Special Counsels were very limited.
He's simply informing us, on what he has found out and happened...

Since congress never bothered to truly investigate, with live hearings on it, like the honest Republicans did with the Watergate break in....

it is the only way for the Public to know what is going on....

the Grand Jury, in this case, advised to indict them....Mueller presented his case to do such, to them, and they decide if charges are warranted, according to our Laws.




"You can fool all the people some of the time,
and some of the people all the time,
but you cannot fool all the people all the time."
Abraham Lincoln



It appears that Lincoln was referring to you in the second clause.

That's about the best he ever said.


Now, now, M&M....

This was pretty good:
"I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel."
April 4, 1864


He was lying for political reasons, the other one is better. :funnyface:

He only wanted to "free the slaves" to give The Union an advantage in the South.


Think about it. Instant non-production. That would tend to hurt the biggest agricultural producers in the US.
 

Forum List

Back
Top