Msnbc blatantly dishonest

[WillowTree]

They're scrolling all the names of the Senators who voted NO on the GUN Bill and showing pictures.. They showed pictures of FOUR DEMOCRATS. Five democrats voted no and Harry Reid was one of them. They won't show Harry Reid. Why NOT?

 

[WillowTree]

Gun Bill Background Check Amendment Fails, Other Key Provisions Follow

 

[Rozman]

They are practically spitting up blood....
Mee ker is all proud....
"We are going to show the names of all those who voted no" she proclaims.

They keep asking why they voted no.
Harry Reid voted no?.The man whose ass they kiss all the time.

Why don't they have him on to splain his self.... ?

 

[WillowTree]

They are practically spitting up blood....
Mee ker is all proud....
"We are going to show the names of all those who voted no" she proclaims.

They keep asking why they voted no.
Harry Reid voted no?.The man whose ass they kiss all the time.

Why don't they have him on to splain his self.... ?

Like I said they didn't even include him in the group that voted NO.

 

[Mad Scientist]

MSNBC, or whatever they're called now, is owned by G.E. which owns the President.

It's their job to be dishonest.

 

[jon_berzerk]

They're scrolling all the names of the Senators who voted NO on the GUN Bill and showing pictures.. They showed pictures of FOUR DEMOCRATS. Five democrats voted no and Harry Reid was one of them. They won't show Harry Reid. Why NOT?

you answered your own question

because they dishonestly report the news

 

[Truthmatters]

http://www.rgj.com/article/20130417/NEWS19/304170124/



Nevada's Harry Reid switches longtime stance to support assault weapon ban

 

[WillowTree]

http://www.rgj.com/article/20130417/NEWS19/304170124/



Nevada's Harry Reid switches longtime stance to support assault weapon ban

look at the HUFFPOST He's clearly on the NO side


Gun Bill Background Check Amendment Fails, Other Key Provisions Follow

 

[blastoff]

I read somewhere Harry voted No so he can bring the bill up again if need be.

 

[rightwinger]

They're scrolling all the names of the Senators who voted NO on the GUN Bill and showing pictures.. They showed pictures of FOUR DEMOCRATS. Five democrats voted no and Harry Reid was one of them. They won't show Harry Reid. Why NOT?

Harrys was a procedural vote so that he can bring the vote up at a laterdate

If Reid had the balls to pass filibuster reform, none of this would have been necessary, He had more than enough votes to pass the bill

 

[Mr. H.]

The bill is lengthy and complicated. It's not just about "background checks".

 

[Ernie S.]

I read somewhere Harry voted No so he can bring the bill up again if need be.

A tactic he uses often. On votes that are not so close, he will vote to make a statement. He rarely votes his conscience. Funny thing is, he must be thinking about retirement if he's voted for an assault weapons ban. Nevadans do like their guns.

 

[Ernie S.]

They're scrolling all the names of the Senators who voted NO on the GUN Bill and showing pictures.. They showed pictures of FOUR DEMOCRATS. Five democrats voted no and Harry Reid was one of them. They won't show Harry Reid. Why NOT?

Harrys was a procedural vote so that he can bring the vote up at a laterdate

If Reid had the balls to pass filibuster reform, none of this would have been necessary, He had more than enough votes to pass the bill

Filibuster reform? Harry doesn't want filibuster reform. That would surely come back to bite him on the ass if it was a 52/48 GOP Senate, wouldn't it?

 

[Truthmatters]

They're scrolling all the names of the Senators who voted NO on the GUN Bill and showing pictures.. They showed pictures of FOUR DEMOCRATS. Five democrats voted no and Harry Reid was one of them. They won't show Harry Reid. Why NOT?

Harrys was a procedural vote so that he can bring the vote up at a laterdate

If Reid had the balls to pass filibuster reform, none of this would have been necessary, He had more than enough votes to pass the bill

why he trusted the republicans to a handshake?


he should have known they have no honor

 

[rightwinger]

They're scrolling all the names of the Senators who voted NO on the GUN Bill and showing pictures.. They showed pictures of FOUR DEMOCRATS. Five democrats voted no and Harry Reid was one of them. They won't show Harry Reid. Why NOT?

Harrys was a procedural vote so that he can bring the vote up at a laterdate

If Reid had the balls to pass filibuster reform, none of this would have been necessary, He had more than enough votes to pass the bill

Filibuster reform? Harry doesn't want filibuster reform. That would surely come back to bite him on the ass if it was a 52/48 GOP Senate, wouldn't it?

Harry is a fucking idiot if he thinks that Republicans will not change the filibuster rules the minute they get a 51-49 majority

 

[Underhill]

Anyone who watches Fox News as their primary source has no right to complain about MSNBC. Fox takes bias to a whole new level. Hell, last election they were promoting rallies for tea party candidates.

 

[Ernie S.]

Harrys was a procedural vote so that he can bring the vote up at a laterdate

If Reid had the balls to pass filibuster reform, none of this would have been necessary, He had more than enough votes to pass the bill

Filibuster reform? Harry doesn't want filibuster reform. That would surely come back to bite him on the ass if it was a 52/48 GOP Senate, wouldn't it?

Harry is a fucking idiot if he thinks that Republicans will not change the filibuster rules the minute they get a 51-49 majority

Did they the last time there was a GOP majority?

 

[rightwinger]

Filibuster reform? Harry doesn't want filibuster reform. That would surely come back to bite him on the ass if it was a 52/48 GOP Senate, wouldn't it?

Harry is a fucking idiot if he thinks that Republicans will not change the filibuster rules the minute they get a 51-49 majority

Did they the last time there was a GOP majority?

That was a kinder and gentler brand of Republican.

Harry Reid is crazy if he thinks Mitch McConnell will not throw everything he has promised out the window once he becomes majority leader.

McConnell can't even keep his promisis to refrain from filibustering every bill

 

[Katzndogz]

MSNBC publishing the names of all those who voted no will have no effect. Those few who watch MSNBC would vote against the democrats anyway. Those viewers won't vote for republicans. The names of those who voted no should be published everywhere. Telling someone who not to vote for is the same thing as telling them who to vote for.

 

[Truthmatters]

did you care when Fox ran with the arrest story and MSNBC refused the information becuase it was unvetted