Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wow...you honestly think liberals and conservatives see every event differently? There is much more than binds the ideologies than separates them. Despite the hatred on both sides, the differences aren't as deep as either would like to think.
By the way...it is very possible for individuals to recognize that they may be wrong. I believe what I believe, but I have no doubt that some of my beliefs are wrong.
and those are the ONLY examples EVER of media errors and ALL of them favor a liberal perspective?
whatever.
I think Larkinn was only acknowledging his awareness of his own fallibility.I believe what I believe, but I have no doubt that some of my beliefs are wrong.
Thats kinda strange....if you have no doubt some of your beliefs are wrong, why would you hold those beliefs ?
Do you find some facts to be the "inconvenient truth"?
Do you just follow the crowd, despite doubts ?
I think Larkinn was only acknowledging his awareness of his own fallibility.
you should try that sometime.
Not at all mate....the 20 or so % of the media that happen to have a conservative perspective have their opinions and spin....
but thats 20% against 80%.....though those percentages are viewed though my prism....
But whatever the true ratio is....its heavily weighted to the left, by their own admission.....
in your opinion.
I suggest that news reporters can, in most cases, report the news professionally and objectively without allowing their own personal politics to get in their way.
You may very well have proof that a majority of journalists self identify as liberal or democrat, but you do not have proof that a majority of them report the news using that bias.
Said the pot to the kettle.
ah.... more chirping from the lying sack of shit.
how droll.
Are you ever gonna explain how someone who is, according to you, a girl who is only 12 years old in 2007 could have been attacking George Bush's military record when she was only five?
Yup no bias at all, that would be why prior to 1997 the term ranking member was never used but after the republicans controlled congress it was.
Thought yoiu were 4 then? Make up your mind.
I have heard the term "ranking member" used all my life.
I believe what I believe, but I have no doubt that some of my beliefs are wrong.
Thats kinda strange....if you have no doubt some of your beliefs are wrong, why would you hold those beliefs ?
Do you find some facts to be the "inconvenient truth"?
Do you just follow the crowd, despite doubts ?
ah.... more chirping from the lying sack of shit.
how droll.
Are you ever gonna explain how someone who is, according to you, a girl who is only 12 years old in 2007 could have been attacking George Bush's military record when she was only five?
Sure you have, go ahead provide us some news clippings ( and I do ot mean podunk newspapers) and some video prior to the republican take over of the press using it.
Ah Maineman, always was a precocious little girl. Joined the navy while she was still in the womb, and was criticizing Bush by the time she was 5.
Sure you have, go ahead provide us some news clippings ( and I do ot mean podunk newspapers) and some video prior to the republican take over of the press using it.
On January 29, 1971, S. Res. 20, as adopted, assigned the minority members as follows: Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Strom Thurmond (Ranking Minority Member), Clifford P. Hansen, Marlow W. Cook, and Ted Stevens.
Jesus you're an idiot. Are you still grasping on to this bullshit?
The term ranking member has ALWAYS been used. Where the hell do you get this stuff? Pull it out of your ass?
The term goes back to at least the 1970s.
http://www.senate.gov/~veterans/public/index.cfm?pageid=8
Jesus you're an idiot. Are you still grasping on to this bullshit?
The term ranking member has ALWAYS been used. Where the hell do you get this stuff? Pull it out of your ass?
The term goes back to at least the 1970s.
http://www.senate.gov/~veterans/public/index.cfm?pageid=8
and true to form, RSG runs away like a little girl, instead of admitting he was wrong.
Because I don't know which ones are wrong. But given the probabilities, general human ignorance, general human lack of rationality I'd give most of my beliefs hmm...maybe 70-80% of being right. Which ones are wrong? I have no idea. You'll notice that on these boards I often skewer others viewpoints as opposed to providing my own. I don't have anwsers, and I don't pretend too. As I said on another thread to Gunny, these are complicated issues they aren't simple. Anyone who looks at them quick and says "ooh I know!" is a fool. Our society has managed to go to the moon, build computers, the steam engine and railroads. The problems stymying the great political minds of our generation aren't "common sense".
