Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 26,528
- 12,485
- 973
So you’re just assuming they followed it.Standard practice, Dumbass.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So you’re just assuming they followed it.Standard practice, Dumbass.
To expose this poster’s ignorance.According to you it doesn't matter, so why even ask the question?
She did show intent to harm in the civil suit.
Why could she not show intent or harm to any party and therefore couldn't bring a criminal suit?? The 'facts' of the case apparently wouldn't allow her to do that. Better call her up and let her know right away!!!
Nah. SHe's arguing that you can just walk into the bank with a piece of paper and they'll write you a check for $200,000,000. Cool beans, huh?Standard practice, Dumbass.
My question is if their theory is that the banks were the ones defrauded why are they not giving the $350M to the banks?
She did show intent to harm in the civil suit.
Everything else you said is pure speculation.
To expose this poster’s ignorance.
Sounds like you ran out of legitimate points to make.Then call her up and ask her why she didn't file criminal charges, you should be demanding them!!!
So you say, yet your argument relies totally on baseless and unsupported speculation.The only ignorance being exposed here is yours, and you're too stupid to realize it.
Trump does not owe anything. He borrowed money. He paid it back. No one was defrauded.Over value an asset by 10% or even 50% and you might have a claim that it was a difference of opinion.
Over value by 1000% or 2000% especially using completely bogus facts and that’s fraud
Which is why Trump owes millions in penalties now
Prove they went outside industry norms, Simp.So you’re just assuming they followed it.
All I can say is that the bank used Trump’s valuations he listed on his financial statement.Prove they went outside industry norms, Simp.
Link?All I can say is that the bank used Trump’s valuations he listed on his financial statement.
They chose to provide the bogus opinion based so about 1/15th the total land mass and total square footage of improvements and referenced what they call “The Club” only. Once experienced professional expert witness are on stand they will state this is not the proper and required procedure. The may also reference the now prohibited procedure of “seeking to not find value” which was a big problem when redlining persisted.Over value an asset by 10% or even 50% and you might have a claim that it was a difference of opinion.
Over value by 1000% or 2000% especially using completely bogus facts and that’s fraud
Which is why Trump owes millions in penalties now
How could you possibly say?All I can say is that the bank used Trump’s valuations he listed on his financial statement.
The income aspect was applied to merely 8% of the total square footage of all improvements and land mass the so called”Club” There really is not much income and Trump did not need and was not including that income in his “qualificatiopackage” as far as I can read . In essence a non issue for the loan but the idiot Turned It Into An issue by using the income approach which was a predetermined and the easiest way to offer up that ridiculously low valuation.The lunatic NY Judge’s valuation of MAL at $18 million isn’t based on the actual value if Trump sold it.
It’s property tax valuation is not based on actual value if Trump sold it, but rather “income approach” which is based on actual income of the business.
He mislead Dimwinger sheep with his valuation that is hundreds of millions too low.
The bank employees said so during trial.How could you possibly say?
You have transcripts from the variety of underwriter involved stating their approvals were predicated on Trumps estimates?
I know title insurance underwriters would not insure a policy on that so no loan funding would be able to occur
You don’t even know what a title insurer does much like All of the processes involved in this yet you babble on like a gurgling infant