Well, in fairness, the DW reruns were kind of boring, anyway.
No, what you got was the realization that "Civil Unions" are pretty much like a Colored Water fountain. It's a set-aside that stigmatizes a group as unequal. The states that actually tried this route quickly realized this and went to full gay marriage, as they should have.
Why is that an ideal? I've known gay couples who are great parents, and I know straight people who have the parenting skills of feral wolves. The fact is, 50% of marriages end in divorce and 40% of children are born to unmarried women. That would seem to be a much more serious problem than gays who want to say they are married, but won't have kids unless they adopt or use some kind of artificial means (insemination, surrogacy).
So other than getting close to the "God" argument, this is a non-starter. Families have much bigger problems than gays getting married.
again, not seeing how any of that is a problem. You really didn't make an argument about why gay marriage is bad, you just wonder why the won't accept the second class water fountain you've set up for them.
Okay, it took you four whole paragraphs to get to the "I think it's Icky" argument, so I'll give you a little credit for that. In most of the world, HIV is a heterosexual disease, of course. Made a lot worse by the fact that YOUR CHURCH, the one you love so much, told people in developing countries that using a rubber was a sin. So maybe instead of blaming homosexuality for AIDS, we should blame religious stupidity. (Which, admittedly, is my default setting, anyway.)
To the point, besides the fact that LESBIANS have a much lower chance of transmitting HIV that straight couples, is that gay marriage would probably reduce the amount of multiple partners gays have, and reduce the spread of the disease, if that was really a concern.
Final Point- there's a whole shitload of behaviors that cause "ill-health" in this society, such as poor diet, smoking, drinking, and so on, and you moral busybodies don't seem to want to spend any time on that. It's them icky, icky gays having the butt sex.
Your religious freedom only applies to you. The problem with you guys is you want to impose your religion on everyone else.
again, if your churches were preaching racism as a tenant of religion, no one would be defending you. You'd lose your tax exemptions and no one would invite your group to the Interfaith Pancake Breakfast where you all pretend the other guys are going to Hell. We need to treat homophobia the same way.
Gay Marriage is yet another failure of our political systems. Years before Gay Marriage even became an issue many of us were working on civil unions because the goal was to give gay couples the same rights as married couples enjoy in courts, in hospitals, in dying wishes, in inheritance, and in the tax code. We got an indulgent pat on the head from the government and were completely ignored.
No, what you got was the realization that "Civil Unions" are pretty much like a Colored Water fountain. It's a set-aside that stigmatizes a group as unequal. The states that actually tried this route quickly realized this and went to full gay marriage, as they should have.
The sacramental definition of marriage is the union of a man and a woman, the union of the two opposite sexes, for the purpose of creating new family units, which is the foundation of society--children who ideally have both mother and father. (Don't bother arguing other arrangements, it was understood alternate arrangements have always existed along with the ideal. I'm merely pointing out that at this point Gays recognized and honored all of this--and many still do. There is the ideal, and then there is the rest that is acceptable as well.)
Why is that an ideal? I've known gay couples who are great parents, and I know straight people who have the parenting skills of feral wolves. The fact is, 50% of marriages end in divorce and 40% of children are born to unmarried women. That would seem to be a much more serious problem than gays who want to say they are married, but won't have kids unless they adopt or use some kind of artificial means (insemination, surrogacy).
So other than getting close to the "God" argument, this is a non-starter. Families have much bigger problems than gays getting married.
Okay, back to the politicians ignoring us. Since the politicians would not give equal rights to unmarried couples, the anger and frustration built and so began the demand for gay marriage. While the gay community lost those of us who supported them on the civil rights issues for unmarried couples, they did capture the attention of the politicians, particularly those on the left. Thanks very much to our inept government officials, the lack of civil rights for unmarried couples still remains...and we inherited Gay Marriage.
again, not seeing how any of that is a problem. You really didn't make an argument about why gay marriage is bad, you just wonder why the won't accept the second class water fountain you've set up for them.
Most homosexuals are very much aware of the risks they take in engaging in sex with a same sex partner. There are above average health risks (even leaving out HIV) and mental health risks are higher as well. Knowing this, many gays and lesbians don't want the "approval" of heterosexuals, which they see as often patronizing. These people jump on the bandwagon of supporting gays to feel cool and open-minded about themselves, waving waved away health concerns as unimportant or even non-existent. (Not cool and open-minded to push people into ill health.) Simply respect their decision, recognizing the risks they face, and at least be happy (though it didn't go as originally intended) that as a couple the government is now willing to give them the rights and benefits they should have had to begin with.
Okay, it took you four whole paragraphs to get to the "I think it's Icky" argument, so I'll give you a little credit for that. In most of the world, HIV is a heterosexual disease, of course. Made a lot worse by the fact that YOUR CHURCH, the one you love so much, told people in developing countries that using a rubber was a sin. So maybe instead of blaming homosexuality for AIDS, we should blame religious stupidity. (Which, admittedly, is my default setting, anyway.)
To the point, besides the fact that LESBIANS have a much lower chance of transmitting HIV that straight couples, is that gay marriage would probably reduce the amount of multiple partners gays have, and reduce the spread of the disease, if that was really a concern.
Final Point- there's a whole shitload of behaviors that cause "ill-health" in this society, such as poor diet, smoking, drinking, and so on, and you moral busybodies don't seem to want to spend any time on that. It's them icky, icky gays having the butt sex.
People are entitled to their religious beliefs. Couples are entitled to equal rights under the law, be they a married couple or an unmarried couple. The Constitution is clear on equal rights and on religious freedoms. So what has our government done? They began trampling on religious freedom while still discriminating against unmarried couples. The stupid way government conducts business....
Your religious freedom only applies to you. The problem with you guys is you want to impose your religion on everyone else.
again, if your churches were preaching racism as a tenant of religion, no one would be defending you. You'd lose your tax exemptions and no one would invite your group to the Interfaith Pancake Breakfast where you all pretend the other guys are going to Hell. We need to treat homophobia the same way.