- Thread starter
- #61
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Still, given a choice between science, and politically motivated conspiracy theories, go with the science. Politically motivated conspiracy theories have one source. Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.
Still, given a choice between science, and politically motivated conspiracy theories, go with the science. Politically motivated conspiracy theories have one source. Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.
Still, given a choice between science, and politically motivated conspiracy theories, go with the science. Politically motivated conspiracy theories have one source. Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.
Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.
That's right, you can't choose a bigger car, liberals are entitled to make you drive a smaller, more dangerous car.
CAFE standards kill.
Still, given a choice between science, and politically motivated conspiracy theories, go with the science. Politically motivated conspiracy theories have one source. Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.
Of course.......well, clearly Im the asshole here. What was I thinking? There are no special interests associated with climate science and green energy!!! Motivated only by good intentions!!! Sorry.....doing the face palm on myself right now s0n!!
Still, given a choice between science, and politically motivated conspiracy theories, go with the science. Politically motivated conspiracy theories have one source. Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.
Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.
That's right, you can't choose a bigger car, liberals are entitled to make you drive a smaller, more dangerous car.
CAFE standards kill.
Not liberals, reality. We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.
You can choose to avoid reality for yourself but not at our expense.
Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.
That's right, you can't choose a bigger car, liberals are entitled to make you drive a smaller, more dangerous car.
CAFE standards kill.
Not liberals, reality. We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.
You can choose to avoid reality for yourself but not at our expense.
Allowing people like you to put others at risk,
LOL! I'm for allowing people (and auto companies) to make their own decisions on what cars, trucks or SUVs to buy (or make), without government coercion making us less safe.
Not liberals, reality. We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.
You can choose to avoid reality for yourself but not at our expense.
Allowing people like you to put others at risk,
LOL! I'm for allowing people (and auto companies) to make their own decisions on what cars, trucks or SUVs to buy (or make), without government coercion making us less safe.
Good for you. Just remember: We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.
Allowing people like you to put others at risk,
LOL! I'm for allowing people (and auto companies) to make their own decisions on what cars, trucks or SUVs to buy (or make), without government coercion making us less safe.
Good for you. Just remember: We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.
We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction.
Right, you're protecting us from death, by causing more deaths.
Liberals are funny. Not very smart, but funny.
Good for you. Just remember: We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.
We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction.
Right, you're protecting us from death, by causing more deaths.
Liberals are funny. Not very smart, but funny.
No evidence.
Many are killed every year by oversized cars because of their oversize. Take big cars off the road, those people live.
Still, not to mention those to be killed by extreme weather events made more frequent and more destructive by AGW.
Here's where costs are already showing up.
How the Insurance Industry Is Dealing With Climate Change | Surprising Science
Conservatives aren't necessarily stupid. But they are necessarily gullible.
A moot point s0n......a moot point. Only to the eco nutter can the world move forward based upon pure speculation. In the real world, people don't like to burn money hoping a genie falls out of the sky.
Your reference demonstrates why AGW has already passed the tipping point and will, before we're done shooting ourselves in the foot, completely overwhelm the world, bringing about the goal of global conservatism, reversing progress.
Our grandchildren are going to be so proud of us.
Of course.......well, clearly Im the asshole here.
There is no AGW. You talk like a religious zealot. Do show some actual proof of AGW. Lets see the smoking gun that would allow you to make such an assured statement.
We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction.
Right, you're protecting us from death, by causing more deaths.
Liberals are funny. Not very smart, but funny.
No evidence.
Many are killed every year by oversized cars because of their oversize. Take big cars off the road, those people live.
Still, not to mention those to be killed by extreme weather events made more frequent and more destructive by AGW.
Here's where costs are already showing up.
How the Insurance Industry Is Dealing With Climate Change | Surprising Science
Conservatives aren't necessarily stupid. But they are necessarily gullible.
Take big cars off the road, those people live.
It's not enough you want to force people into dangerous cars, now you want to outlaw safer cars?
Are you also going to outlaw trucks and single car crashes?
No evidence.
Many are killed every year by oversized cars because of their oversize. Take big cars off the road, those people live.
Still, not to mention those to be killed by extreme weather events made more frequent and more destructive by AGW.
Here's where costs are already showing up.
How the Insurance Industry Is Dealing With Climate Change | Surprising Science
Conservatives aren't necessarily stupid. But they are necessarily gullible.
Take big cars off the road, those people live.
It's not enough you want to force people into dangerous cars, now you want to outlaw safer cars?
Are you also going to outlaw trucks and single car crashes?
I want people to drive cars that are safer for everyone. You don't?????
A moot point s0n......a moot point. Only to the eco nutter can the world move forward based upon pure speculation. In the real world, people don't like to burn money hoping a genie falls out of the sky.
Guess he has no idea what happens to humanity when energy isn't available. These earth first wackos think that they want to live in a world where energy use is scarce, but it is a sure bet that they have never tried it and they are to damned stupid to look at the short brutal life spans in the third world to see what scarce energy looks like.
Your reference demonstrates why AGW has already passed the tipping point and will, before we're done shooting ourselves in the foot, completely overwhelm the world, bringing about the goal of global conservatism, reversing progress.
Our grandchildren are going to be so proud of us.
There is no AGW. You talk like a religious zealot. Do show some actual proof of AGW. Lets see the smoking gun that would allow you to make such an assured statement.
We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction.
Right, you're protecting us from death, by causing more deaths.
Liberals are funny. Not very smart, but funny.
No evidence.
Many are killed every year by oversized cars because of their oversize. Take big cars off the road, those people live.
Still, not to mention those to be killed by extreme weather events made more frequent and more destructive by AGW.
Here's where costs are already showing up.
How the Insurance Industry Is Dealing With Climate Change | Surprising Science
Conservatives aren't necessarily stupid. But they are necessarily gullible.
Take big cars off the road, those people live.
It's not enough you want to force people into dangerous cars, now you want to outlaw safer cars?
Are you also going to outlaw trucks and single car crashes?