More Proof the skeptics are WINNING!!

[skookerasbil]

The Green Agenda

 

[PMZ]

Still, given a choice between science, and politically motivated conspiracy theories, go with the science. Politically motivated conspiracy theories have one source. Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.

 

[skookerasbil]

Still, given a choice between science, and politically motivated conspiracy theories, go with the science. Politically motivated conspiracy theories have one source. Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.

Of course.......well, clearly Im the asshole here. What was I thinking? There are no special interests associated with climate science and green energy!!! Motivated only by good intentions!!! Sorry.....doing the face palm on myself right now s0n!!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Still, given a choice between science, and politically motivated conspiracy theories, go with the science. Politically motivated conspiracy theories have one source. Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.

Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.

That's right, you can't choose a bigger car, liberals are entitled to make you drive a smaller, more dangerous car.

CAFE standards kill.

 

[PMZ]

Still, given a choice between science, and politically motivated conspiracy theories, go with the science. Politically motivated conspiracy theories have one source. Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.

Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.

That's right, you can't choose a bigger car, liberals are entitled to make you drive a smaller, more dangerous car.

CAFE standards kill.

Not liberals, reality. We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.

You can choose to avoid reality for yourself but not at our expense.

 

[PMZ]

Still, given a choice between science, and politically motivated conspiracy theories, go with the science. Politically motivated conspiracy theories have one source. Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.

Of course.......well, clearly Im the asshole here. What was I thinking? There are no special interests associated with climate science and green energy!!! Motivated only by good intentions!!! Sorry.....doing the face palm on myself right now s0n!!

Real science is never a special interest. It's merely reality.

Politics is always about special interests.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Still, given a choice between science, and politically motivated conspiracy theories, go with the science. Politically motivated conspiracy theories have one source. Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.

Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.

That's right, you can't choose a bigger car, liberals are entitled to make you drive a smaller, more dangerous car.

CAFE standards kill.

Not liberals, reality. We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.

You can choose to avoid reality for yourself but not at our expense.

Allowing people like you to put others at risk,

LOL! I'm for allowing people (and auto companies) to make their own decisions on what cars, trucks or SUVs to buy (or make), without government coercion making us less safe.

 

[PMZ]

Those who feel entitled to impose what's best for them on people for whom something different is best.

That's right, you can't choose a bigger car, liberals are entitled to make you drive a smaller, more dangerous car.

CAFE standards kill.

Not liberals, reality. We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.

You can choose to avoid reality for yourself but not at our expense.

Allowing people like you to put others at risk,

LOL! I'm for allowing people (and auto companies) to make their own decisions on what cars, trucks or SUVs to buy (or make), without government coercion making us less safe.

Good for you. Just remember: We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Not liberals, reality. We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.

You can choose to avoid reality for yourself but not at our expense.

Allowing people like you to put others at risk,

LOL! I'm for allowing people (and auto companies) to make their own decisions on what cars, trucks or SUVs to buy (or make), without government coercion making us less safe.

Good for you. Just remember: We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.

We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction.

Right, you're protecting us from death, by causing more deaths.

Liberals are funny. Not very smart, but funny.

 

[PMZ]

Allowing people like you to put others at risk,

LOL! I'm for allowing people (and auto companies) to make their own decisions on what cars, trucks or SUVs to buy (or make), without government coercion making us less safe.

Good for you. Just remember: We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.

We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction.

Right, you're protecting us from death, by causing more deaths.

Liberals are funny. Not very smart, but funny.

No evidence.

Many are killed every year by oversized cars because of their oversize. Take big cars off the road, those people live.

Still, not to mention those to be killed by extreme weather events made more frequent and more destructive by AGW.

Here's where costs are already showing up.

http://blogs.smithsonianmag.com/sci..._medium=email&utm_campaign=20130929-Weekender

Conservatives aren't necessarily stupid. But they are necessarily gullible.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Good for you. Just remember: We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction. Allowing people like you to put others at risk, today due to the oversized car, and tomorrow from dumping excess waste in our atmosphere, is not tolerable among responsible people.

We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction.

Right, you're protecting us from death, by causing more deaths.

Liberals are funny. Not very smart, but funny.

No evidence.

Many are killed every year by oversized cars because of their oversize. Take big cars off the road, those people live.

Still, not to mention those to be killed by extreme weather events made more frequent and more destructive by AGW.

Here's where costs are already showing up.

How the Insurance Industry Is Dealing With Climate Change | Surprising Science

Conservatives aren't necessarily stupid. But they are necessarily gullible.

Take big cars off the road, those people live.


It's not enough you want to force people into dangerous cars, now you want to outlaw safer cars?

Are you also going to outlaw trucks and single car crashes?

 

[SSDD]

A moot point s0n......a moot point. Only to the eco nutter can the world move forward based upon pure speculation. In the real world, people don't like to burn money hoping a genie falls out of the sky.

Guess he has no idea what happens to humanity when energy isn't available. These earth first wackos think that they want to live in a world where energy use is scarce, but it is a sure bet that they have never tried it and they are to damned stupid to look at the short brutal life spans in the third world to see what scarce energy looks like.

 

[SSDD]

Your reference demonstrates why AGW has already passed the tipping point and will, before we're done shooting ourselves in the foot, completely overwhelm the world, bringing about the goal of global conservatism, reversing progress.
Our grandchildren are going to be so proud of us.

There is no AGW. You talk like a religious zealot. Do show some actual proof of AGW. Lets see the smoking gun that would allow you to make such an assured statement.

 

[Abraham3]

Of course.......well, clearly Im the asshole here.

A quote to hang on to.

 

[Abraham3]

There is no AGW. You talk like a religious zealot. Do show some actual proof of AGW. Lets see the smoking gun that would allow you to make such an assured statement.

Do show some sort of connection with reality. The smoking gun appeared a good 20 years back.

And as has been clearly demonstrated, Mamooth's statement regarding the Second Law of Thermodynamics is correct.

The positions you've taken on the Second Law, on radiative heat transfer, on quantum mechanics and, here, on AGW, ALL indicate that what you claim to believe has nothing to do with evidence, logic or reason and, apparently, everything to do with you wanting to appear contrary and expecting some admiration for it.

I think you're a very-close-to-total doof.

 

[PMZ]

We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction.

Right, you're protecting us from death, by causing more deaths.

Liberals are funny. Not very smart, but funny.

No evidence.

Many are killed every year by oversized cars because of their oversize. Take big cars off the road, those people live.

Still, not to mention those to be killed by extreme weather events made more frequent and more destructive by AGW.

Here's where costs are already showing up.

How the Insurance Industry Is Dealing With Climate Change | Surprising Science

Conservatives aren't necessarily stupid. But they are necessarily gullible.

Take big cars off the road, those people live.


It's not enough you want to force people into dangerous cars, now you want to outlaw safer cars?

Are you also going to outlaw trucks and single car crashes?

I want people to drive cars that are safer for everyone. You don't?????

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

No evidence.

Many are killed every year by oversized cars because of their oversize. Take big cars off the road, those people live.

Still, not to mention those to be killed by extreme weather events made more frequent and more destructive by AGW.

Here's where costs are already showing up.

How the Insurance Industry Is Dealing With Climate Change | Surprising Science

Conservatives aren't necessarily stupid. But they are necessarily gullible.

Take big cars off the road, those people live.


It's not enough you want to force people into dangerous cars, now you want to outlaw safer cars?

Are you also going to outlaw trucks and single car crashes?

I want people to drive cars that are safer for everyone. You don't?????

Sounds good, repeal CAFE standards, now.

 

[PMZ]

A moot point s0n......a moot point. Only to the eco nutter can the world move forward based upon pure speculation. In the real world, people don't like to burn money hoping a genie falls out of the sky.

Guess he has no idea what happens to humanity when energy isn't available. These earth first wackos think that they want to live in a world where energy use is scarce, but it is a sure bet that they have never tried it and they are to damned stupid to look at the short brutal life spans in the third world to see what scarce energy looks like.

Tell us what happens to humanity from a different climate?

You are the first that I've read in favor of energy shortages. I know the liberal agenda is to avoid the shortages certain to happen as FF run out. Conservatives want to do nothing to prepare for that certainly. Of course doing nothing insures shortages.

 

[PMZ]

Your reference demonstrates why AGW has already passed the tipping point and will, before we're done shooting ourselves in the foot, completely overwhelm the world, bringing about the goal of global conservatism, reversing progress.
Our grandchildren are going to be so proud of us.

There is no AGW. You talk like a religious zealot. Do show some actual proof of AGW. Lets see the smoking gun that would allow you to make such an assured statement.

The smoking gun is a scientific certainty. What has zero support is any possible consequences of increased atmospheric GHG concentration other than AGW.

You people who deny science are a mystery to me.

 

[PMZ]

We, the people, have every right to protect our freedom from death and destruction.

Right, you're protecting us from death, by causing more deaths.

Liberals are funny. Not very smart, but funny.

No evidence.

Many are killed every year by oversized cars because of their oversize. Take big cars off the road, those people live.

Still, not to mention those to be killed by extreme weather events made more frequent and more destructive by AGW.

Here's where costs are already showing up.

How the Insurance Industry Is Dealing With Climate Change | Surprising Science

Conservatives aren't necessarily stupid. But they are necessarily gullible.

Take big cars off the road, those people live.


It's not enough you want to force people into dangerous cars, now you want to outlaw safer cars?

Are you also going to outlaw trucks and single car crashes?

Apparently the concept of safer, as compared to safe, is pretty slippery to the conservative ''mind''.