Marxist
Senior Member
Read into how previous anarchist areas functioned, I imagine we can put some new modern context onto it.How would you in vision an anarchy in the United States?Yes, I've heard of the Paris commune. It ruled Paris for less than a month but as with all anarchy, it failed. Anarchy is not a form of government but rather the absence of it. In an anarchy there can't be one man more powerful than another because then that man and his disciples will eventually over time rise to a higher and higher power thus forming a monarchy or some other form of government. This is why anarchy is destined to fail.Have you heard of the paris commune? The anarchists in spain? The free ukraine territories? Check out my signature.Don't need capitalist? Let's here your plan.Yeah, that's clearly working, not like CEO'S are raking in massive bonuses, productivity is massively high and not going down to the workers in terms of wages, which are stagnant.. The problem for me is, we don't need capitalists to achieve any of this.More then just the commune, and it didn't fail due to being anarchy.. It failed due to mass slaughter by the french armed forces, as with the other examples of anarchism. The free territory of ukraine? Killed and slaughtered. Of course it's the absence of it, but many anarchists have a democratic platform with worker cooperation, without the state. It's not destined to fail, you can say anything you want, I don't think the people will allow that to happen.18 March to 28 May 1871.