- Thread starter
- #61
Shackled Nation, in response to my writing The proportional extent of minimum rates affect is inversely related to the wages amounts you responded my statement makes no sense whatsoever.
You contend that a $150,000 executives salary is not to some extent less affected by the minimum wage as a $60,000 per year technicians salary, or that technicians salary is not to some extent less affected than that of a $35,000 wage of a hotel clerk, and that clerks wages are not less affected than that of a $10/Hr. truck helper and that helpers income is not affected by the federal minimum wage?
Your contention cannot be valid unless the federal minimum wage rate has absolutely no indirect affect upon the incomes of any of those who do not earn precisely the minimum rate.
Thats an illogical contention.
Respectfully, Supposn
You contend that a $150,000 executives salary is not to some extent less affected by the minimum wage as a $60,000 per year technicians salary, or that technicians salary is not to some extent less affected than that of a $35,000 wage of a hotel clerk, and that clerks wages are not less affected than that of a $10/Hr. truck helper and that helpers income is not affected by the federal minimum wage?
Your contention cannot be valid unless the federal minimum wage rate has absolutely no indirect affect upon the incomes of any of those who do not earn precisely the minimum rate.
Thats an illogical contention.
Respectfully, Supposn