Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I asked you to explain how MOrgan's actions were not a complete betrayal of his responsibility to the organization and it's stated mission.
Your answer is to tell me to write to them.
You know that you can't deny that he is abusing his power, but you lack the intellectual honesty to admit it.
Which is sad because this is a very small incident. Admitting that this guy abused his position doesn't mean you have to admit ANYTHING else.
And yet, you can't be honest even on this very small thing.
That reflects very poorly on you. You should really think about that.
Not my problem....he doesn't work for me
He is a free citizen working on an independent publication
Just like Milo working for Breitbart
Right. Because on this site we never discuss issues that don't directly impact us...
Why are you being like this? You have let your partisanship blind you.
Trump is not worth destroying yourself over. The panic mongering that has wound you up was completely bullshit.
Relax.
Do I think he should be fired from the Chicago Review?
Hell No!
I don't give a shit about the Chicago Review. Never heard of it and really don't care what they review or don't review
You see his actions in the OP and I have posted the stated mission of the Review.
It is only your blind partisanship that is preventing you from admitting that he has completely betrayed his responsibilities.
Do you realize how much your extreme partisanship is warping your perceptions?
For crying out loud.....
The guy works for Breitbart.....Who is he to whine about the journalistic standards of the Chicago Review?
Crickets Mamooth, crickets.
So, you got nothing...
Color me shocked.
You really thought that that troll will answer you?
Well, he might now, but he wont give his answer any more thought than the average trolls 2.5 nanoseconds.
Don't you snowflakes ever step away from the computer?
Just how late did you stay up whining?
I have a bad back from two herniated discs, and I was in pain almost all last night. I dont take the pain killers unless I have to because I dont want to become addicted tot he opioids and not much else really helps me.
And I dont hardly ever talk about it, much less 'whine about it', loser.
Crickets Mamooth, crickets.
So, you got nothing...
Color me shocked.
You really thought that that troll will answer you?
Well, he might now, but he wont give his answer any more thought than the average trolls 2.5 nanoseconds.
Don't you snowflakes ever step away from the computer?
Just how late did you stay up whining?
Get a life, losers.
Milo's racism is more subtle, more cowardly. He doesn't espouse the racism personally. He just steadfastly defends the worst racists on the planet, by viciously attacking anyone who is un-PC enough to point out that obvious racism is obvious racism. For example, when it gets pointed out that how his best pals are openly calling for the death of Jews, Milo responds how that's not really anti-semitism, and that only overly sensitive SJWs say it is antisemitism. Same goes with blacks, hispanics, muslims every group.
Very similar to P@triot, he is in that way, not being brave enough to admit to to his own racism, and endlessly trying to cover for the racism of others. I wonder if P@triot uses Milo's defense that he can't be a racist because he craves sexual attention from black men.
I called you a troll, not a coward.It still doesn't mean you should call others cowards because they didn't stay up all night.
Oh that wont stop them, with any luck.Blah, blah, blah, racism, blah, blah, blah, racism.
IF there is every a time, when white racism becomes relevant to something somehow, you need to travel in time to bitch at the lefties of the last 50 years.
Cause they killed that for you.
Not my problem....he doesn't work for me
He is a free citizen working on an independent publication
Just like Milo working for Breitbart
Right. Because on this site we never discuss issues that don't directly impact us...
Why are you being like this? You have let your partisanship blind you.
Trump is not worth destroying yourself over. The panic mongering that has wound you up was completely bullshit.
Relax.
Do I think he should be fired from the Chicago Review?
Hell No!
I don't give a shit about the Chicago Review. Never heard of it and really don't care what they review or don't review
You see his actions in the OP and I have posted the stated mission of the Review.
It is only your blind partisanship that is preventing you from admitting that he has completely betrayed his responsibilities.
Do you realize how much your extreme partisanship is warping your perceptions?
For crying out loud.....
The guy works for Breitbart.....Who is he to whine about the journalistic standards of the Chicago Review?
1. That in no way addressed anything I said.
2. There is NOTHING in the op or this thread about Milo addressing this at all. This is about our judgement on the man's actions, which clearing betray the publicly posted mission of the review, a fact that you cannot honestly admit.
3. AND the implications of his betrayal and your refusal to condemn it. ie, the the Left in general and you specifically place partisan politics ahead of professional responsibility and intellectual honesty.
Right. Because on this site we never discuss issues that don't directly impact us...
Why are you being like this? You have let your partisanship blind you.
Trump is not worth destroying yourself over. The panic mongering that has wound you up was completely bullshit.
Relax.
Do I think he should be fired from the Chicago Review?
Hell No!
I don't give a shit about the Chicago Review. Never heard of it and really don't care what they review or don't review
You see his actions in the OP and I have posted the stated mission of the Review.
It is only your blind partisanship that is preventing you from admitting that he has completely betrayed his responsibilities.
Do you realize how much your extreme partisanship is warping your perceptions?
For crying out loud.....
The guy works for Breitbart.....Who is he to whine about the journalistic standards of the Chicago Review?
1. That in no way addressed anything I said.
2. There is NOTHING in the op or this thread about Milo addressing this at all. This is about our judgement on the man's actions, which clearing betray the publicly posted mission of the review, a fact that you cannot honestly admit.
3. AND the implications of his betrayal and your refusal to condemn it. ie, the the Left in general and you specifically place partisan politics ahead of professional responsibility and intellectual honesty.
Betrayal?
Of a guy who writes for Breitbart? Save it for Hannity Snowflake
Who the fuck is Milo?And why are people afraid of him getting a book published?Yes...the left is not a supporter of freedom of expression or of the press......they only want it for themselves and you had better not try to write a book they don't like...
Chicago Review of Books Editor Says MILO's Words Could Inspire Terrorism - Breitbart
Adam Morgan, the Editor in Chief of the Chicago Review of Books, published an article today in The Guardian explaining why the Chicago Review of Books chose to boycott Simon & Schuster, the company publishing MILO’s new book, DANGEROUS.
The title of the Guardian article reads, “Publishing Milo Yiannopoulos’ book is wrong. My magazine is fighting back.” However the URL of the article and the Facebook sharing preview reveal the title, “Simon & Schuster is rewarding alt-right hate speech. We cannot stay silent.”
This may be a simple error but it is also likely that the title calling MILO’s book “alt-right hate speech” was the original tile of the article. The Guardian may have realised their error in calling MILO “alt-right”, a political movement which MILO has repeatedly stated he is not part of, despite the media’s various attempts to paint him as a “leader” of the movement, and changed the article title.
Do I think he should be fired from the Chicago Review?
Hell No!
I don't give a shit about the Chicago Review. Never heard of it and really don't care what they review or don't review
You see his actions in the OP and I have posted the stated mission of the Review.
It is only your blind partisanship that is preventing you from admitting that he has completely betrayed his responsibilities.
Do you realize how much your extreme partisanship is warping your perceptions?
For crying out loud.....
The guy works for Breitbart.....Who is he to whine about the journalistic standards of the Chicago Review?
1. That in no way addressed anything I said.
2. There is NOTHING in the op or this thread about Milo addressing this at all. This is about our judgement on the man's actions, which clearing betray the publicly posted mission of the review, a fact that you cannot honestly admit.
3. AND the implications of his betrayal and your refusal to condemn it. ie, the the Left in general and you specifically place partisan politics ahead of professional responsibility and intellectual honesty.
Betrayal?
Of a guy who writes for Breitbart? Save it for Hannity Snowflake
It was clear that my use of the word betrayal was in reference to his JOB DUTIES and his employer.
Are you drunk or playing stupid?
No, he is being censored by fascists, and those same fascists will cry their own river one day not too far from now, bet on it, Twinkle Toes.Oh cry me a river Snowflake...
Poor , poor Milo is being picked on by liberals
No, he is being censored by fascists, and those same fascists will cry their own river one day not too far from now, bet on it, Twinkle Toes.Oh cry me a river Snowflake...
Poor , poor Milo is being picked on by liberals
You see his actions in the OP and I have posted the stated mission of the Review.
It is only your blind partisanship that is preventing you from admitting that he has completely betrayed his responsibilities.
Do you realize how much your extreme partisanship is warping your perceptions?
For crying out loud.....
The guy works for Breitbart.....Who is he to whine about the journalistic standards of the Chicago Review?
1. That in no way addressed anything I said.
2. There is NOTHING in the op or this thread about Milo addressing this at all. This is about our judgement on the man's actions, which clearing betray the publicly posted mission of the review, a fact that you cannot honestly admit.
3. AND the implications of his betrayal and your refusal to condemn it. ie, the the Left in general and you specifically place partisan politics ahead of professional responsibility and intellectual honesty.
Betrayal?
Of a guy who writes for Breitbart? Save it for Hannity Snowflake
It was clear that my use of the word betrayal was in reference to his JOB DUTIES and his employer.
Are you drunk or playing stupid?
Oh cry me a river Snowflake...
Poor , poor Milo is being picked on by liberals
The Chicago Review is not being "betrayed" until they start losing money
.
For crying out loud.....
The guy works for Breitbart.....Who is he to whine about the journalistic standards of the Chicago Review?
1. That in no way addressed anything I said.
2. There is NOTHING in the op or this thread about Milo addressing this at all. This is about our judgement on the man's actions, which clearing betray the publicly posted mission of the review, a fact that you cannot honestly admit.
3. AND the implications of his betrayal and your refusal to condemn it. ie, the the Left in general and you specifically place partisan politics ahead of professional responsibility and intellectual honesty.
Betrayal?
Of a guy who writes for Breitbart? Save it for Hannity Snowflake
It was clear that my use of the word betrayal was in reference to his JOB DUTIES and his employer.
Are you drunk or playing stupid?
Oh cry me a river Snowflake...
Poor , poor Milo is being picked on by liberals
The Chicago Review is not being "betrayed" until they start losing money
.
NOpe. If you read their mission statement that I posted, they have been betrayed.
That partisan bile you feel that leads you to lie about this? That is what drove Morgan to NOT do his job.
We see this from liberals all the time, and we see liberals support this type of behavior all the time.
We have to accept that this is not an isolated case.
Liberals can't be trusted with ANY power or authority because they believe it is moral, according to their belief system to NOT do what they are supposed to do, but to abuse their power to advance the lefty agenda.
1. That in no way addressed anything I said.
2. There is NOTHING in the op or this thread about Milo addressing this at all. This is about our judgement on the man's actions, which clearing betray the publicly posted mission of the review, a fact that you cannot honestly admit.
3. AND the implications of his betrayal and your refusal to condemn it. ie, the the Left in general and you specifically place partisan politics ahead of professional responsibility and intellectual honesty.
Betrayal?
Of a guy who writes for Breitbart? Save it for Hannity Snowflake
It was clear that my use of the word betrayal was in reference to his JOB DUTIES and his employer.
Are you drunk or playing stupid?
Oh cry me a river Snowflake...
Poor , poor Milo is being picked on by liberals
The Chicago Review is not being "betrayed" until they start losing money
.
NOpe. If you read their mission statement that I posted, they have been betrayed.
That partisan bile you feel that leads you to lie about this? That is what drove Morgan to NOT do his job.
We see this from liberals all the time, and we see liberals support this type of behavior all the time.
We have to accept that this is not an isolated case.
Liberals can't be trusted with ANY power or authority because they believe it is moral, according to their belief system to NOT do what they are supposed to do, but to abuse their power to advance the lefty agenda.
Who cares?
If they are more concerned with their mission statement than their bottom line, they will fire the guy
They don't seem to be in any hurry to defend the rights of a Breitbart editor
Betrayal?
Of a guy who writes for Breitbart? Save it for Hannity Snowflake
It was clear that my use of the word betrayal was in reference to his JOB DUTIES and his employer.
Are you drunk or playing stupid?
Oh cry me a river Snowflake...
Poor , poor Milo is being picked on by liberals
The Chicago Review is not being "betrayed" until they start losing money
.
NOpe. If you read their mission statement that I posted, they have been betrayed.
That partisan bile you feel that leads you to lie about this? That is what drove Morgan to NOT do his job.
We see this from liberals all the time, and we see liberals support this type of behavior all the time.
We have to accept that this is not an isolated case.
Liberals can't be trusted with ANY power or authority because they believe it is moral, according to their belief system to NOT do what they are supposed to do, but to abuse their power to advance the lefty agenda.
Who cares?
If they are more concerned with their mission statement than their bottom line, they will fire the guy
They don't seem to be in any hurry to defend the rights of a Breitbart editor
Your support of Morgan putting politics ahead of professional responsibility and ethics demonstrates my point.
Morgan is an asshole.
It was clear that my use of the word betrayal was in reference to his JOB DUTIES and his employer.
Are you drunk or playing stupid?
Oh cry me a river Snowflake...
Poor , poor Milo is being picked on by liberals
The Chicago Review is not being "betrayed" until they start losing money
.
NOpe. If you read their mission statement that I posted, they have been betrayed.
That partisan bile you feel that leads you to lie about this? That is what drove Morgan to NOT do his job.
We see this from liberals all the time, and we see liberals support this type of behavior all the time.
We have to accept that this is not an isolated case.
Liberals can't be trusted with ANY power or authority because they believe it is moral, according to their belief system to NOT do what they are supposed to do, but to abuse their power to advance the lefty agenda.
Who cares?
If they are more concerned with their mission statement than their bottom line, they will fire the guy
They don't seem to be in any hurry to defend the rights of a Breitbart editor
Your support of Morgan putting politics ahead of professional responsibility and ethics demonstrates my point.
Morgan is an asshole.
You Snowflakes are driving me to drink
So life is not fair........let me find you and Milo a Safe Space full of unicorns and rainbows
Oh cry me a river Snowflake...
Poor , poor Milo is being picked on by liberals
The Chicago Review is not being "betrayed" until they start losing money
.
NOpe. If you read their mission statement that I posted, they have been betrayed.
That partisan bile you feel that leads you to lie about this? That is what drove Morgan to NOT do his job.
We see this from liberals all the time, and we see liberals support this type of behavior all the time.
We have to accept that this is not an isolated case.
Liberals can't be trusted with ANY power or authority because they believe it is moral, according to their belief system to NOT do what they are supposed to do, but to abuse their power to advance the lefty agenda.
Who cares?
If they are more concerned with their mission statement than their bottom line, they will fire the guy
They don't seem to be in any hurry to defend the rights of a Breitbart editor
Your support of Morgan putting politics ahead of professional responsibility and ethics demonstrates my point.
Morgan is an asshole.
You Snowflakes are driving me to drink
So life is not fair........let me find you and Milo a Safe Space full of unicorns and rainbows
All I'm doing is calling attention to your behavior, and not allowing you to rationalize it.
Here is some of the speech that Morgan considers inviting discrimination.
Crickets Mamooth, crickets.
So, you got nothing...
Color me shocked.
You really thought that that troll will answer you?
Well, he might now, but he wont give his answer any more thought than the average trolls 2.5 nanoseconds.
Don't you snowflakes ever step away from the computer?
Just how late did you stay up whining?
Get a life, losers.
Milo's racism is more subtle, more cowardly. He doesn't espouse the racism personally. He just steadfastly defends the worst racists on the planet, by viciously attacking anyone who is un-PC enough to point out that obvious racism is obvious racism. For example, when it gets pointed out that how his best pals are openly calling for the death of Jews, Milo responds how that's not really anti-semitism, and that only overly sensitive SJWs say it is antisemitism. Same goes with blacks, hispanics, muslims every group.
Very similar to P@triot, he is in that way, not being brave enough to admit to to his own racism, and endlessly trying to cover for the racism of others. I wonder if P@triot uses Milo's defense that he can't be a racist because he craves sexual attention from black men.
