Milo Yiannopolous gets a book deal...left wants him kept from publishing it...of course...

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,970
52,238
2,290
Yes...the left is not a supporter of freedom of expression or of the press......they only want it for themselves and you had better not try to write a book they don't like...

Chicago Review of Books Editor Says MILO's Words Could Inspire Terrorism - Breitbart

Adam Morgan, the Editor in Chief of the Chicago Review of Books, published an article today in The Guardian explaining why the Chicago Review of Books chose to boycott Simon & Schuster, the company publishing MILO’s new book, DANGEROUS.

The title of the Guardian article reads, “Publishing Milo Yiannopoulos’ book is wrong. My magazine is fighting back.” However the URL of the article and the Facebook sharing preview reveal the title, “Simon & Schuster is rewarding alt-right hate speech. We cannot stay silent.”

This may be a simple error but it is also likely that the title calling MILO’s book “alt-right hate speech” was the original tile of the article. The Guardian may have realised their error in calling MILO “alt-right”, a political movement which MILO has repeatedly stated he is not part of, despite the media’s various attempts to paint him as a “leader” of the movement, and changed the article title.
 
Wow. Just wow. And the left has the balls to continually turn around and declare that conservatives want to take away the First Amendment.
 
So Milo the twitter twit is playing the victim _again_?

He just can't stand everyone ignoring him.

I mean, the poor baby. People are criticizing his racist crap. Boohoo. What a snowflake pussy.
 
So Milo the twitter twit is playing the victim _again_?

He just can't stand everyone ignoring him.

I mean, the poor baby. People are criticizing his racist crap. Boohoo. What a snowflake pussy.
Sooo....you hate gay people?
 
So Milo the twitter twit is playing the victim _again_?

He just can't stand everyone ignoring him.

I mean, the poor baby. People are criticizing his racist crap. Boohoo. What a snowflake pussy.


Actually the snowflakes at universities try to shut him down when he comes to speak.......only marxists need apply, eh, comrade???
 
Snowflakes, Milo can talk wherever he wants. He just can't demand to get paid for it.

He can publish to whoever will take him. And we can punish those who try to make a buck off of him.

Aint' freedom grand? You can say all the stupid things you want, and we can make you suffer for it. We're fine with that arrangement, and you're crying.

So, what is it you love most about Milo?

Is it his prissy metrosexual pajama-boy looks?

Or is it the way he encourages his followers to stalk women with rape and death threats?
 
So Milo the twitter twit is playing the victim _again_?

He just can't stand everyone ignoring him.

I mean, the poor baby. People are criticizing his racist crap. Boohoo. What a snowflake pussy.



There is nothing in the op about milo saying anything. This is about the attempt to suppress his speech by liberals.


What are you talking about?
 
Snowflakes, Milo can talk wherever he wants. He just can't demand to get paid for it.

He can publish to whoever will take him. And we can punish those who try to make a buck off of him.

Aint' freedom grand? You can say all the stupid things you want, and we can make you suffer for it. We're fine with that arrangement, and you're crying.

So, what is it you love most about Milo?

Is it his prissy metrosexual pajama-boy looks?

Or is it the way he encourages his followers to stalk women with rape and death threats?


THe libs in the OP disagree, they want to stop him from getting published.


And if you ever watch any of his speaking events, you see that the lefties are constantly trying to stop him from speaking.

YOu are delusional.
 
So Milo the twitter twit is playing the victim _again_?

He just can't stand everyone ignoring him.

I mean, the poor baby. People are criticizing his racist crap. Boohoo. What a snowflake pussy.



There is nothing in the op about milo saying anything. This is about the attempt to suppress his speech by liberals.


What are you talking about?
S/he is just deflecting from the censorship leftists embrace.
 
THe libs in the OP disagree, they want to stop him from getting published.

No, they're punishing those who do publish him. There's a big difference. If you can't see it, it's becasue you don't grasp freedom.

And if you ever watch any of his speaking events, you see that the lefties are constantly trying to stop him from speaking.

YOu are delusional.

You poor conservatives. You can't force people to pay to be forced to watch your heroes. Censorship! Boohoo!

Good luck with that, snowflakes.
 
THe libs in the OP disagree, they want to stop him from getting published.

No, they're punishing those who do publish him. There's a big difference. If you can't see it, it's becasue you don't grasp freedom.

And if you ever watch any of his speaking events, you see that the lefties are constantly trying to stop him from speaking.

YOu are delusional.

You poor conservatives. You can't force people to pay to be forced to watch your heroes. Censorship! Boohoo!

Good luck with that, snowflakes.
Well, here is the crux of the matter. You idiots do not realize that giving extra publicity to your censorship attempts will entice more people to buy the book, therefore you idiots help him to sell more. (unintended consequences, huh? hahaha..)
 
THe libs in the OP disagree, they want to stop him from getting published.

No, they're punishing those who do publish him. There's a big difference. If you can't see it, it's becasue you don't grasp freedom.

And if you ever watch any of his speaking events, you see that the lefties are constantly trying to stop him from speaking.

YOu are delusional.

You poor conservatives. You can't force people to pay to be forced to watch your heroes. Censorship! Boohoo!

Good luck with that, snowflakes.


1. The point of punishing the publisher is to stop the book.

2. The lefties at milo's events are not not watching. THey are trying to prevent the event. YOur statement is completely disconnected from reality. Are you lying or stupid?
 
1. The point of punishing the publisher is to stop the book.

Boycotts are freedom of expression, and a way for the majority to hit a tyrannical minority where it hurts.

I can see why it bothers you so much.

We know how this ends up. Nobody except the conservative book-of-the-month club cares about the book, and it quickly goes into the dollar bin. Same as every Coulter book. Milo is just repeating her schtick.
 
1. The point of punishing the publisher is to stop the book.

Boycotts are freedom of expression, and a way for the majority to hit a tyrannical minority where it hurts.

I can see why it bothers you so much.

We know how this ends up. Nobody except the conservative book-of-the-month club cares about the book, and it quickly goes into the dollar bin. Same as every Coulter book. Milo is just repeating her schtick.


1. YOur accusations of tyranny is merely you smearing your enemies with your lies, you vile liar.

2. Censorship bothers me.

3. The book will be on the New York Time's best seller list, if they do their jobs. Your nonsensical ravings not withstanding. ANN?! Ann has had many books on the best seller list.

Ann Coulter - Wikipedia


"Coulter is the author of twelve books, many of which have appeared on The New York Times Best Seller list, with a combined 3 million copies sold as of May 2009"
 

Forum List

Back
Top