Iran, Syria and anyone who allied themselves with them.
It'd be a bloodbath...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Iran, Syria and anyone who allied themselves with them.
The lack of critical thinking would be coming from you. You oppose anything that even be misconstrued as right or good, and do so blindly, only ensuring that you are disagreeing with whatever the conservative stance is.
It'd be a bloodbath...
Total, utter crap....
It'd be a bloodbath...
Yeah, I think they call it "war."
I personally think that regardless of what I think about how we got there the reality is that, unlike Vietnam, this particular war has the actual danger of reaching our shores if we are foolish enough to leave that nation in disarray. We must be smarter than that and leave when the leaving can be accomplished without handing total victory to the terrorists we do fight there... Not every person fighting our forces or even attacking their citizens are Iraqis and ignoring the danger would be foolish indeed.
Now that is the question of the hour, are WE willing to actually go to war? Europe isn't, not now and since they really haven't the capability, w/o nuclear weapons, I suppose the point is moot.
Are we willing? Right now, I don't think so-the will comes from the top, it's not there.
It's always been the question and the answer is no. America is hooked on comfort.
Bush went too far trying to rally the people but I'm glad he at least tried.
The irony here is I have maintained this stance from the beginning. I STILL recall some Republicans/conservatives jumping in my ass for daring to hold such an opinion a few years ago.
It's like time-lapse common sense.
He tried? Ha. Trying would be using rational arguements, not platitudes that any idiot, even liberals could knock down. Seriously.
Liberals haven't knocked down shit--seriously. They don't like war and claim there is an alternative. All they would have to do is vocally back our efforts and this would be over by now.
Now that is the question of the hour, are WE willing to actually go to war? Europe isn't, not now and since they really haven't the capability, w/o nuclear weapons, I suppose the point is moot.
Are we willing? Right now, I don't think so-the will comes from the top, it's not there.
So why doesn't he speak to the real message being sold in the Saudi funded schools in Detroit, Chicago, NY, LA, etc? Instead we here, "a religion of peace" and our 'stalwart friends, the Saudis'. We keep sending boatloads of $$$ to Egypt, Pakistan, and the Palestinians-now through 'alternative' means as Carter suggested, when they elected fing Hamas to leadership.
No one will listen--the jig is up---the politicians and bankers are going to step in.
Its not there because it was a bullshit war built on fear and lies from the start. It didn't help any that it was run by men who were way out of their depth either.
Why? I thought Bush made it 'clear' why it was worth it?
He had to convince more people than he did.
Nope, he said enough to keep the choir in place, but not enough to last. That is his fault and legacy. Now he's into cut and run.
Like he has a choice in the matter.