Military victory is no longer possible in Iraq

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by Bullypulpit, Nov 20, 2006.

  1. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    <blockquote>"If you mean by 'military victory,' an Iraqi government that can be established and whose writ runs across the whole country, that gets the civil war under control and sectarian violence under control in a time period that the political processes of the democracies will support, I don't believe that is possible," - Henry Kissinger, 11/19/06</blockquote>

    Hmmmm...Let me think now...Wasn't that the reason Poppy Bush didn't march into Baghdad in 1991?

    <blockquote>I think for us to get American military personnel involved in a civil war inside Iraq would literally be a quagmire. Once we got to Baghdad, what would we do? Who would we put in power? What kind of government would we have? Would it be a Sunni government, a Shia government, a Kurdish government? Would it be secular along the lines of the Ba’ath Party? Would it be fundamentalist Islamic? I do not think the United States wants to have U.S. military forces accept casualties and accept the responsibility of trying to govern Iraq. I think it makes no sense at all. - Dick Cheney, 4/7/91</blockquote>

    We knew in 1991 what would happen if US forces toppled Saddam Hussein. The wargaming of an invasion of Iraq in 1999 showed that what we see in Iraq now was the likely outcome even with far larger numbers of troops than what we went into Iraq with in 2003.

    Hank went on to further state that, "...he would have preferred a post-invasion policy that installed a strong Iraqi leader from the military or some other institution and deferred the development of democracy until later. "If we had done that right away, that might have been the best way to proceed,". But isn't that what was in place prior to Chimpy and Co's invasion of Iraq? Why don't we just dust off Saddam and re-install him as the leader of Iraq? It wouldn't be the first time a US administration has propped him up.

    As more and more neo-con's jump ship on the policy in Iraq, which they pushed for...Despite the repudiation of the Administration policy in Iraq on November 7th, Chimpy and Co seem to have little interest in making any changes to policy in Iraq. Their grip on the reality of the situation in Iraq is tenuous at best, and their policy is still "Stay the course...". So the profligate spending of American blood and treasure will continue unabated until this Administration leaves office. Then, the real work will begin...Cleaning up the mess they have left behind.
     
  2. CSM
    Offline

    CSM Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2004
    Messages:
    6,907
    Thanks Received:
    708
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Northeast US
    Ratings:
    +708
    Ah, getting your excuses ready early, eh?
     
  3. no1tovote4
    Offline

    no1tovote4 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2004
    Messages:
    10,294
    Thanks Received:
    616
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Location:
    Colorado
    Ratings:
    +616
    I notice that you ignored the part where the same guy stated that we cannot leave Iraq at this time without putting the US in danger....

    I guess it's all good to pretend he didn't say that rather than be honest, it wouldn't support your assertion that this is "exactly like Vietnam".

    It isn't. Vietnam had no way to reach our shores, these people have already proven that they can. Leaving before there is some kind of stability would be more than foolish, it would provide them a stanchion whereon to build future direct attacks.
     
  4. dmp
    Offline

    dmp Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    13,088
    Thanks Received:
    741
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Enterprise, Alabama
    Ratings:
    +741
    Bully - do you get ALL your info from 'talking points' of various organizations? Have you personally SPOKEN to any Iraqi War Vets?
     
  5. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    There was no need to belabor the obvious...You've already done that for me. but think, what a horrible thing to say to our soldiers in Iraq. "There's no way to win militarily, but we're going to leave you in harm's way anyways." What a horrible betrayal of the trust our troops have that their sacrifices won't be in vain.

    And, while there are few similarites to Viet Nam militarily, it is in the political arena that the similarities are most striking. Just as Lyndon Johnson advocated a "stay the course" policy, I won't dignify it with the term "strategy", so too does this President advocate staying the course, with no real strategy apparent. Just as in Viet Nam, it is the politicians who are driving the policy, not the generals on the ground. Just as in Viet Nam, our troops will be left in harm's way until the politicians have decided that they have saved enough face. How can Bush, Cheney, or anyone else in this failed administration, ask any of our soldiers to be the last one to die for a mistake?
     
  6. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    Hate to pull the rug out from under one of your rants, but we ALREADY won our military victory, and quite convincingly.

    While you attempt to lay all blame at the feet of President Bush, as usual, it is bureaucracy, political correctness, and/or appeasement that is making the democratization of Iraq such a chore. Maybe if you libs would lay off the rhetoric and insisting on fighting by some arbitrary set of rules/morals -- y'all always seem to have a lot of compassion for the enemies of the US but NONE for unborn babies here at home -- we might be able to get somewhere.

    You're dreaming if you think some politician -- regardless the party -- is going to come in after this administration and suddenly have a clue. Anyone with a brain ALREADY knows the answers, and NONE are conducive to geopolitics.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. 1549
    Offline

    1549 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2006
    Messages:
    676
    Thanks Received:
    59
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    New Jersey
    Ratings:
    +59
    Hahahaha...oh wait, you are serious?

    Lets do it the old way!!! Lets blow 'em away and install a brutal pro-American dictator!!!! Then, 50 years from now Iraqis can take over our embassy and hold U.S. citizens hostage. Of course Americans are rather clueless when it comes to historical cause and effect, so we can all ask: "why would they do such a thing?"

    Great idea Gunny...where can I sign up?
     
  8. Gunny
    Offline

    Gunny Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2004
    Messages:
    44,689
    Thanks Received:
    6,753
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    The Republic of Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,770
    What would you know about "the old way" other than what you've read in a book, punk?

    I'm sure you're naive enough to believe that if we leave Islamic extremists alone they will leave us alone because you've proven yourself just dumb enough to, but you're wrong.

    I guarantee you that if US forces start aggressively hunting these idiots down and blowing them away, sooner or later they're going to wake up to the fact they're outmatched and the mortality rate isn't worth the occupation.

    But as long as pussies like you permeate our society, standing and fighting long enough to outlast an enemy won't happen. Thank God people like you either didn't exist or hid under your beds quivering during WW II.
     
  9. shepherdboy
    Offline

    shepherdboy Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2006
    Messages:
    234
    Thanks Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Location:
    The occupied zone(CA.)
    Ratings:
    +34
    I wish our military was allowed to fight its enemies without the kid gloves on. The enemies of the United State has yet to see the full capabilities of the Armed Forces of the United States. What a wake up call that would be to the critic's.
     
  10. Bullypulpit
    Offline

    Bullypulpit Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2004
    Messages:
    5,849
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Columbus, OH
    Ratings:
    +379
    Then get the political hacks in the Bush administration out of the way. If they had actually listened to ANYTHING anyone in the military told them in the run up to the invasion of Iraq, we wouldn't have gone there to begin with.
     

Share This Page