Of course. That's why he have them - and that's why our right to have them is protected by the most powerful words to that effect in the Constitution.the fact still remains that guns can kill people
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Of course. That's why he have them - and that's why our right to have them is protected by the most powerful words to that effect in the Constitution.the fact still remains that guns can kill people
Yes. But to try to stop those people is a form of prior restaint.Sometimes sane, law abiding people do insane things.
Because he had done done anything yet and he passed the gun law's.
Had he been but in a health care center in June 2010, he would not have been able to get a gun in Nov. 2010.
So no one bothers to perform a psychological or psychiatric evaluation on someone purchasing a gun, whether they've been committed or treated for it or not?
Until you are judged mentally infirm, you have every right to buy a gun.If it's a mental problem not a gun problem, could anyone tell me how he, a schizophrenic, got a gun in the first place?
Of course not. That would violate the Constitution.Because he had done done anything yet and he passed the gun law's.
Had he been but in a health care center in June 2010, he would not have been able to get a gun in Nov. 2010.
So no one bothers to perform a psychological or psychiatric evaluation on someone purchasing a gun, whether they've been committed or treated for it or not?
No, its not.It's not a violation of the constitution to get help for the mentally ill if they are a threat to society.
Yes. But to try to stop those people is a form of prior restaint.Sometimes sane, law abiding people do insane things.
Constitutionally, prior restraint is forbidden.
No... but prior restraint is.Constitutionally..the right to bear arms..is still not quite settled.Yes. But to try to stop those people is a form of prior restaint.Sometimes sane, law abiding people do insane things.
Constitutionally, prior restraint is forbidden.
Here we go again with more gun laws or speech laws.
Why do the left keep trying to make more gun laws instead of getting right to the problem,which is this guy has a mental problem.
It is not a gun problem, it's a mental disorder and gun laws will not keep guns out of their hands. They need to be sent to a Mental Health facility.
He is a schizophrenic.
"McGahee said Loughner sometimes shook, blurted things out in class and appeared to be under the influence of drugs at times, McGahee said."
I get the feeling these proclamations of his mental illnesses will lose much of their charm if his lawyers employ an insanity defense.
the fact still remains that guns can kill people
It is not a gun problem, it's a mental disorder and gun laws will not keep guns out of their hands. They need to be sent to a Mental Health facility.
He is a schizophrenic.
If we had Health Centers all across the nation, the college he went to could have gotten him into one of those places and away from the public.
Pima College has, as all schools and colleges, social workers and psychologist's.
If congress passed a law for schools, college's,hospital's so on and so forth to have more clout at assesing these type of mental problems, they could be sent to theses type of facalities and have gotten him away from harming anyone.
In other words, Make a law to protect the public from the mentality ill.
Not gun laws ,not speech laws.
It is not a gun problem, it's a mental disorder and gun laws will not keep guns out of their hands. They need to be sent to a Mental Health facility.
To my knowledge, Lougher had not done anything that would have warranted involuntary commitment.
He is a schizophrenic.
I can't find that Lougher has been diagnosed with schizophrenia anywhere. Most schizophrenics would lack the ability to concoct and carry out a plan of assassination. Their thought process is too disordered. Instead, Schizophrenics tend to act in the moment based on their delusions and hallucinations, which can make them a danger to themselves (mostly) or others (rarely).
Where do you get that he was schizoprhenic?
That's not how it works. We just don't lock away people at the first sign of oddness.
Pima College has, as all schools and colleges, social workers and psychologist's.
If congress passed a law for schools, college's,hospital's so on and so forth to have more clout at assesing these type of mental problems, they could be sent to theses type of facalities and have gotten him away from harming anyone.
Which creates a dangerous precedent and gives extraordinary power to a group of people who might not be trained to use them. As it stands, only a physician can involuntarily commit somebody. And they do so knowing that they will have to appear before a judge and explain their decision.
In other words, Make a law to protect the public from the mentality ill.
Not gun laws ,not speech laws.
Guns in the hands of the mentally ill (which I certainly think Lougher is) is a problem. Period.