skookerasbil
Platinum Member
10 YEARS AGO TODAY - Al Gore Predicted North Pole Would Be COMPLETELY ICE FREE in Five Years
@www.whoarethest00pids.com
@www.whoarethest00pids.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What nobody cares about - particularly the science - is what YOU give a fuck about fool.
What nobody cares about - particularly the science - is what YOU give a fuck about fool.
Sure we are, dumb ass. And look at how fast Canada is cooling off.we're cooling off?The warming rate is now 33 times what it was 10,000 years ago. What the fuck do you think?
SSDD said:And yet, Greenland's ice mass is way above normal...It has gained about 500 gigatons since September 2017...leaving it about 150 gigatons above the 1981-2010 mean.
You left out a critical piece of information...alarmists will universally leave out this bit of information when talking about arctic ice.
You left out a critical piece of information...alarmists will universally leave out this bit of information when talking about arctic ice.
So, Willie Soon, the paid shill of the fossil fuel industry, quoting a Russian named Genrikh Alekseev. And how does that guy get it?
---
For instance, a strong correlation (a coefficient equal to -0.93) was found between the summer SAT in the marine Arctic and satellite-derived 1980-2014 September sea ice index (the average of SIE in the Arctic since 1978, in millions of km2). Based on this finding, anomalies of Arctic September SIE were reconstructed from the beginning of 20th century using a linear regression relationship
---
That is, he doesn't look at any actual historical ice measurements. He looks at nearby air temperature and RUNS A MODEL. His work has little connection to reality.
Meanwhile, here's what the actual historical Arctic Sea Ice levels look like, from actual ice measurements. The denier myth of "Ice was at a peak in 1979!" is exactly that, a myth.
This is taken from Meier 2012.
TC - A simple approach to providing a more consistent Arctic sea ice extent time series from the 1950s to present
You never fail to be a dupe....tell me hairball...what do you suppose the arctic looked like 10,000 years ago compared to today?
if Greenland is only a spot on the globe, why are we discussing it here? Isn't this your folks discussion point? I'm just saying, way to shit on your peer.You never fail to be a dupe....tell me hairball...what do you suppose the arctic looked like 10,000 years ago compared to today?
The dishonesty of pretending that one spot in Greenland is whole globe has been pointed out to you before. Yes, we get it, you've got a limited stable of lies to fall back on.
And again, you ran from the issue I brought up, like you always do. That issue was how you used a weird MODEL from an unknown Russian dude instead of actual historical sea ice measurements, because the actual measurements showed your cult was making it all up.
Care to address that? The hypocrisy of you relying on a model over hard data was the especially funny part, given your constant blubbering about models. I can see why you ran from that, being how you were so effective hoisted on your own petard.
But then, that's always the case. We rely on hard data, while you rely on unproven models and speculation, such as that weird ice model, or the UAH satellite temperature, or your bizarro-world physics in general.
The dishonesty of pretending that one spot in Greenland is whole globe has been pointed out to you before. Yes, we get it, you've got a limited stable of lies to fall back on.
And again, you ran from the issue I brought up, like you always do. That issue was how you used a weird MODEL from an unknown Russian dude instead of actual historical sea ice measurements, because the actual measurements showed your cult was making it all up.
Care to address that? The hypocrisy of you relying on a model over hard data was the especially funny part, given your constant blubbering about models. I can see why you ran from that, being how you were so effective hoisted on your own petard.
How long, and how many times has climate science told us
What the hell are you talking about hairball
What "wierd" model
How long, and how many times has climate science told us
That has nothing to do with the dishonesty of pretending that the temperature of one spot in Greenland represents the temperature of the entire world.
What the hell are you talking about hairball
Is everyone else in your cult also a predatory old queer? No wonder you're so cranky and frustrated. It must be really creepy there. I can see why you choose to do your cruising here.
What "wierd" model
First, if you're going to call others stupid, it's best to spellcheck.
As I explained in post #90, your graph of Arctic Ice levels in post #50 comes from a model from a Russian guy. In contrast, I posted the hard data on Arctic ice, data based on ice measurements instead of models.
The result? Your ran. But then, you always run, from everyone on every topic. And you're going to keep running here, since you won't want to explain why you embraced a model after screaming about the evils of models. So, I'll get to keep laughing. Ah, life is good.
Is that why Obama bought a mansion on the ocean beach?Climate change: Study shows 'off the charts' melting of Greenland's ice sheet - CNN
There is enough ice there to raise sea level by 23 feet. And this dump of cold, fresh water will impact the operation of the Gulf Stream and the Atlantic's MOC.
That has nothing to do with the dishonesty of pretending that the temperature of one spot in Greenland represents the temperature of the entire world.
Is everyone else in your cult also a predatory old queer? No wonder you're so cranky and frustrated. It must be really creepy there. I can see why you choose to do your cruising here.
IAs I explained in post #90, your graph of Arctic Ice levels in post #50 comes from a model from a Russian guy. In contrast, I posted the hard data on Arctic ice, data based on ice measurements instead of models.
The result? Your ran. But then, you always run, from everyone on every topic. And you're going to keep running here, since you won't want to explain why you embraced a model after screaming about the evils of models. So, I'll get to keep laughing. Ah, life is good.
Once again you showed us that you are ignorant and dishonest.