Melting of Greenland's ice sheets accelerates dramatically

So what caused all the millennia of Ice Ages, then Tropical periods before Man existed, and before Man's industrialization? Nobody is disputing the climate changes. It always has, now big government, Statists, and Globalists want to use it as an excuse to confiscate yet more money from the poor, and middle income earners.
 
Of course it does...did you not read the articles...

Your deflection still had nothing to do with the dishonesty of pretending that the temperature of one spot in Greenland represents the temperature of the entire world. You're the only kook pretending it does, so stop lying and pretending that others are as dishonest as you. They're not.

We all know why you're behaving like this, xxxxxxxxxxx-edited Meister The global temperature data contradicts your cult's sacred scripture on global temperature, so you're forced to ignore the actual data and lie-by-cherrypicking. Everyone knows you're lying, but that's not the point. The point for you is to earn cult brownie points by demonstrating how you're willing to tell any lie on behalf of the cult. I don't blame you. Your cult is very violent and unstable, and they really hate apostates.

So no answer? Just another logical fallacy. How unsurprising is that?

How is it a fallacy to point out your deviant morality, a common feature of hardcore cultists?

Some Russian guy?

Stick to the topic. He's running a model, and the actual ice measurements disagree with his model output. His model failed, and yet you prefer that failed model over measured reality. With an attitude like that, of course you'll get laughed at. Harder.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So what caused all the millennia of Ice Ages, then Tropical periods before Man existed, and before Man's industrialization? Nobody is disputing the climate changes. It always has, now big government, Statists, and Globalists want to use it as an excuse to confiscate yet more money from the poor, and middle income earners.

Sure the climate changed, but once you use Manns Nature Trick to hide the decline and add back the heat trapped in the deep ocean, but caused by atmospheric CO2, you get unprecedented warming change climate, er, or something.
 
Why don't you come back when you have something real to tell us?
 
And such as the climate, and maps, and the South Africa, like, ummmm, and...…..like...….
 
If that was supposed to say something regarding the melting of Greenland's ice cap, I'm afraid it failed miserably.
 
OOPS!

“For this year, we calculated a total SMB of 517bn tonnes, which is almost 150bn tonnes above the average for 1981-2010, ranking just behind the 2016-17 season as sixth highest on record.”
E51ADA4C-1D6F-4C3F-97F2-5058100F1344.jpeg


How the Greenland ice sheet fared in 2018
 
From your link

"This budget takes into account the balance between snow that is added to the ice sheet and melting snow and glacier ice that runs off into the ocean. The ice sheet also loses ice by the breaking off, or "calving", of icebergs from its edge, but that is not included in this type of budget. As a result, the SMB will always be positive – that is, the ice sheet gains more snow than the ice it loses."
...
"The period 2003-2011 has seen ice sheet losses on Greenland averaging 234bn tonnes each year. The neutral mass change in the last two years does not – and cannot – begin to compensate for these losses."

SMB is Snow Mass Balance, a figure of net loss or gain. The topic is the increased melt rate that has been developing over the last decade or so. This last summer has been a rather cool one in Greenland. In addition, fresh snow increases the albedo of the ice sheet and slows melt rates.

Be that as it may, Greenland's, over the long term, is shrinking and its meltwater is adding significantly to global sea level rise.

Greenland-ice-mass-balance.jpg

fm Discover.com

GrnLndMassTrnd.png
 
We should be getting rid of the entire Trump administration by the fastest means possible, rejecting every single thing that Trump has put into place since the day he was elected and start court proceedings to see if, on top of campaign finance violations, he might be guilty of the simple crime of treason.

Then, we need to get hot and heavy reducing CO2 emissions to as near zero as we can physically do.
 
Just as soon as you move the world's coastal population to higher ground.

howhigh.png
 
Last edited:
Let's see, 5% of the world's population threatened by a 1-4 meter sea level rise. That'd be 385 MILLION people that will need to be relocated. New homes, new roads, new supporting businesses, new job sites, new infrastructure. Why don't you take a "wild ass guess" as to what that might cost, fool.
 

Forum List

Back
Top