Media Matter Blames Beck!

[Oddball]

Lots of support for Beck's violence.

As soon as you come up with some verifiable examples, you'll be the first.

 

[Bfgrn]

Q: What is conservatism?
A: Conservatism is the domination of society by an aristocracy.

I love it when they start out with bullshit. You can discard the whole thing immediately.

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Really? What do you call THIS????

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/126894-tax-the-rich-lose-the-rich.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/127068-for-liberals-if-taxes-go-up-on-rich-how-will-you-feel-about-consequences.html

I hear it every day on this board...conservatives believe in the domination of society by an aristocracy. They believe in a hierarchy and a meritocracy.


'People who believe that the aristocracy rightfully dominates society because of its intrinsic superiority are conservatives; democrats, by contrast, believe that they are of equal social worth.'

 

[Liberty]

Q: What is conservatism?
A: Conservatism is the domination of society by an aristocracy.

I love it when they start out with bullshit. You can discard the whole thing immediately.

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Really? What do you call THIS????

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/126894-tax-the-rich-lose-the-rich.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/127068-for-liberals-if-taxes-go-up-on-rich-how-will-you-feel-about-consequences.html

I hear it every day on this board...conservatives believe in the domination of society by an aristocracy. They believe in a hierarchy and a meritocracy.


'People who believe that the aristocracy rightfully dominates society because of its intrinsic superiority are conservatives; democrats, by contrast, believe that they are of equal social worth.'

find me one conservative commintator that backs up your claim and calls out for what you call "aristocracy". find me one. i can find you liberals who say they literally they want socialism. find me one. go ahead.

also:

"Since 1776 there have been no American spokesmen for the European ideals of "conservatism": support for an established church and a hereditary aristocracy. Rather, American conservatism is a reaction against utopian ideas of progress.[22] Russell Kirk saw the American Revolution itself as "a conservative reaction, in the English political tradition, against royal innovation"[23]." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservatism_in_the_United_States

youre living in the 18th century, dumbfuck.

 

[Samson]

Lots of support for Beck's violence.

what a Dummie, Beck has comitted NO violence, and that makes you a liar now doesn't it?

Finally, willow is here to be the voice of reason.

 

[daveman]

Q: What is conservatism?
A: Conservatism is the domination of society by an aristocracy.

I love it when they start out with bullshit. You can discard the whole thing immediately.

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Really? What do you call THIS????

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/126894-tax-the-rich-lose-the-rich.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/127068-for-liberals-if-taxes-go-up-on-rich-how-will-you-feel-about-consequences.html

I call it zero proof of your assertion.

I hear it every day on this board...conservatives believe in the domination of society by an aristocracy. They believe in a hierarchy and a meritocracy.


'People who believe that the aristocracy rightfully dominates society because of its intrinsic superiority are conservatives; democrats, by contrast, believe that they are of equal social worth.'

Equal social worth? Oh, then you oppose Affirmative Action, hiring quotas, and relaxing hiring standards in the name of diversity?

Conservatives, who really do believe in the equality of all people, oppose those preferential practices.

 

[Bfgrn]

I love it when they start out with bullshit. You can discard the whole thing immediately.

WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Really? What do you call THIS????

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/126894-tax-the-rich-lose-the-rich.html

http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/127068-for-liberals-if-taxes-go-up-on-rich-how-will-you-feel-about-consequences.html

I hear it every day on this board...conservatives believe in the domination of society by an aristocracy. They believe in a hierarchy and a meritocracy.


'People who believe that the aristocracy rightfully dominates society because of its intrinsic superiority are conservatives; democrats, by contrast, believe that they are of equal social worth.'

find me one conservative commintator that backs up your claim and calls out for what you call "aristocracy". find me one. i can find you liberals who say they literally they want socialism. find me one. go ahead.

also:

"Since 1776 there have been no American spokesmen for the European ideals of "conservatism": support for an established church and a hereditary aristocracy. Rather, American conservatism is a reaction against utopian ideas of progress.[22] Russell Kirk saw the American Revolution itself as "a conservative reaction, in the English political tradition, against royal innovation"[23]." Conservatism in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

youre living in the 18th century, dumbfuck.

I'll do better...

How about the Bush White House?

Paul O'Neill, Bush's first Treasury Secretary...

Paul O'Neill, George Bush's first Treasury Secretary

The president had promised to cut taxes, and he did. Within six months of taking office, he pushed a trillion dollars worth of tax cuts through Congress. But O'Neill thought it should have been the end. After 9/11 and the war in Afghanistan, the budget deficit was growing. So at a meeting with the vice president after the mid-term elections in 2002, Suskind writes that O'Neill argued against a second round of tax cuts.

“Cheney, at this moment, shows his hand,” says Suskind. “He says, ‘You know, Paul, Reagan proved that deficits don't matter. We won the mid-term elections, this is our due.’ … O'Neill is speechless.”

”It was not just about not wanting the tax cut. It was about how to use the nation's resources to improve the condition of our society,” says O’Neill. “And I thought the weight of working on Social Security and fundamental tax reform was a lot more important than a tax reduction.”

Did he think it was irresponsible? “Well, it's for sure not what I would have done,” says O’Neill.

The former treasury secretary accuses Vice President Dick Cheney of not being an honest broker, but, with a handful of others, part of "a praetorian guard that encircled the president" to block out contrary views. "This is the way Dick likes it," says O’Neill.


“It's a huge meeting. You got Dick Cheney from the, you know, secure location on the video. The President is there,” says Suskind, who was given a nearly verbatim transcript by someone who attended the meeting.

He says everyone expected Mr. Bush to rubber stamp the plan under discussion: a big new tax cut. But, according to Suskind, the president was perhaps having second thoughts about cutting taxes again, and was uncharacteristically engaged.

“He asks, ‘Haven't we already given money to rich people? This second tax cut's gonna do it again,’” says Suskind.

“He says, ‘Didn’t we already, why are we doing it again?’ Now, his advisers, they say, ‘Well Mr. President, the upper class, they're the entrepreneurs. That's the standard response.’ And the president kind of goes, ‘OK.’ That's their response. And then, he comes back to it again. ‘Well, shouldn't we be giving money to the middle, won't people be able to say, ‘You did it once, and then you did it twice, and what was it good for?’"

But according to the transcript, White House political advisor Karl Rove jumped in.

“Karl Rove is saying to the president, a kind of mantra. ‘Stick to principle. Stick to principle.’ He says it over and over again,” says Suskind. “Don’t waver.”

In the end, the president didn't. And nine days after that meeting in which O'Neill made it clear he could not publicly support another tax cut, the vice president called and asked him to resign.

With the deficit now climbing towards $400 billion, O'Neill maintains he was in the right.

 

[Liberty]

Ok...where is the word "aristocracy" ??

also you basically say the entire wikipedia page on modern american conservatism is wrong? How do you explain that?

here:
"Since 1776 there have been no American spokesmen for the European ideals of "conservatism": support for an established church and a hereditary aristocracy. Rather, American conservatism is a reaction against utopian ideas of progress.[22] Russell Kirk saw the American Revolution itself as "a conservative reaction, in the English political tradition, against royal innovation"[23]."

"Since 1776 there have been no American spokesmen for the European ideals of "conservatism": support for an established church and a hereditary aristocracy. Rather, American conservatism is a reaction against utopian ideas of progress.[22] Russell Kirk saw the American Revolution itself as "a conservative reaction, in the English political tradition, against royal innovation"[23]."

"Since 1776 there have been no American spokesmen for the European ideals of "conservatism": support for an established church and a hereditary aristocracy. Rather, American conservatism is a reaction against utopian ideas of progress.[22] Russell Kirk saw the American Revolution itself as "a conservative reaction, in the English political tradition, against royal innovation"[23]."

"Since 1776 there have been no American spokesmen for the European ideals of "conservatism": support for an established church and a hereditary aristocracy. Rather, American conservatism is a reaction against utopian ideas of progress.[22] Russell Kirk saw the American Revolution itself as "a conservative reaction, in the English political tradition, against royal innovation"[23]."

get it? You are living in the 18th century british definition. get with the times.

 

[Samson]

It makes zero sense as beck has never ever recommended or promoted violent action against anyone.

You're making crap up and failing miserably at making a connection that doesn't exist.

We've been waiting for days for that...None of the moonbats seem to have come up with any of them.

I feel compelled to help the Moonbats:

From Bfrgn's Washington Post Op Ed:

Most every broadcast has some violent imagery:
"The clock is ticking. . . .
The war is just beginning. . . .
Shoot me in the head if you try to change our government. . . .
You have to be prepared to take rocks to the head. . . .
The other side is attacking. . . .
There is a coup going on. . . .
Grab a torch! . . .
Drive a stake through the heart of the bloodsuckers. . . .
They are taking you to a place to be slaughtered. . . .
They are putting a gun to America's head. . . . "

And, my personal favorite and the one that no doubt causes the most Moonbat-Panty-Wads:

"Hold these people responsible."

 

[Rinata]

Both sides have their douche bags..

Beck = Olbermann.

Maddow = Hannity.

Easy.

In your dreams, idiot. That's like saying Rosie O'Donnell and Jessica Simpson look the same in the identical dress. The only thing Olbermann and Maddow share with those other idiots is that they are all on tv.

 

[Rinata]

There is NO way Glenn can be blamed.

You folks are useful idiots to even try to.



"When bad men combine, The good must associate; Else they will fall, one by one..."

Edmund Burke 1766

When is it ok to ask Beck to be more careful? When more Police officers lose their lives, like in Pittsburgh?

He gets on his show every night, and convinces his audience that:

Obama is out to:
Kill your Grandparents
Take your guns
Turn America into nazi germany
Get the white people

Progressives are:
A "cancer"
Racist against whites
Baby killers
.. Shit, I'm not even gonna continue.. But you get the point.
With this kind of talk, at some point, he has to take responsibility for what happens.

Hey dumbass.... when are you going to realize that you, I, Glenn, nor FUCKING MICKEY MOUSE can make someone else do something.....

TAKE RESPONSIBLITY FOR YOUR OWN ACTIONS AND SHUT THE FUCK UP!


Gawd, that is what is wrong with this generation.... "It not my fault, I have sex addiction... its not my fault, I was tricked.... its not my fault, I was sexually abused as a child.... its not my fault, I was pulled over for being black"

HOLY SHIT PEOPLE..... WAKE THE HELL UP!!!!!

You don't get it, dumb ass.

 

[Rinata]

Lots of support for Beck's violence.

As soon as you come up with some verifiable examples, you'll be the first.

Bull. You've been given examples coming out of your ears. You are all too dumb to get it. And I notice a whole new group of bagheads in this thread. More idiots to set straight.

 

[Liberty]

Lots of support for Beck's violence.

As soon as you come up with some verifiable examples, you'll be the first.

Bull. You've been given examples coming out of your ears. You are all too dumb to get it. And I notice a whole new group of bagheads in this thread. More idiots to set straight.

oh no, are you the reinforcement to represent the land of dumbassery? run for yer lives!

 

[Bfgrn]

Lots of support for Beck's violence.

As soon as you come up with some verifiable examples, you'll be the first.

Bull. You've been given examples coming out of your ears. You are all too dumb to get it. And I notice a whole new group of bagheads in this thread. More idiots to set straight.

Rinata...you are dealing with 'word bound' pea brains...Beck DID say:

"The clock is ticking. . . .
The war is just beginning. . . .
Shoot me in the head if you try to change our government. . . .
You have to be prepared to take rocks to the head. . . .
The other side is attacking. . . .
There is a coup going on. . . .
Grab a torch! . . .
Drive a stake through the heart of the bloodsuckers. . . .
They are taking you to a place to be slaughtered. . . .
They are putting a gun to America's head. . . . "
"Hold these people responsible."

BUT, because Beck didn't say or use the 'word' 'violence' it's all benign and totally harmless...

It is a general popular error to suppose the loudest complainers for the public to be the most anxious for its welfare.
Edmund Burke

 

[The Infidel]

When is it ok to ask Beck to be more careful? When more Police officers lose their lives, like in Pittsburgh?

He gets on his show every night, and convinces his audience that:

Obama is out to:
Kill your Grandparents
Take your guns
Turn America into nazi germany
Get the white people

Progressives are:
A "cancer"
Racist against whites
Baby killers
.. Shit, I'm not even gonna continue.. But you get the point.
With this kind of talk, at some point, he has to take responsibility for what happens.

Hey dumbass.... when are you going to realize that you, I, Glenn, nor FUCKING MICKEY MOUSE can make someone else do something.....

TAKE RESPONSIBLITY FOR YOUR OWN ACTIONS AND SHUT THE FUCK UP!


Gawd, that is what is wrong with this generation.... "It not my fault, I have sex addiction... its not my fault, I was tricked.... its not my fault, I was sexually abused as a child.... its not my fault, I was pulled over for being black"

HOLY SHIT PEOPLE..... WAKE THE HELL UP!!!!!

You don't get it, dumb ass.

Oh do tell..... what did I not get?

 

[The Infidel]

Rinata...you are dealing with 'word bound' pea brains...Beck DID say:

"The clock is ticking. . . .
The war is just beginning. . . .
Shoot me in the head if you try to change our government. . . .
You have to be prepared to take rocks to the head. . . .
The other side is attacking. . . .
There is a coup going on. . . .
Grab a torch! . . .
Drive a stake through the heart of the bloodsuckers. . . .
They are taking you to a place to be slaughtered. . . .
They are putting a gun to America's head. . . . "
"Hold these people responsible."

BUT, because Beck didn't say or use the 'word' 'violence' it's all benign and totally harmless...

It is a general popular error to suppose the loudest complainers for the public to be the most anxious for its welfare.
Edmund Burke

He also says that blood is going to shoot out of his eyes... or his head is going to explode.

Does that mean those things are really going to happen???? Holy crap you liberals are stupid!



Oh, and you forgot the pitchforks



BTW.... It is a general popular error to suppose the loudest complainers for the public to be the most anxious for its welfare.
Edmund Burke

/\/\/\/\ That can also be used to describe the left /\/\/\

 

[Samson]

As soon as you come up with some verifiable examples, you'll be the first.

Bull. You've been given examples coming out of your ears. You are all too dumb to get it. And I notice a whole new group of bagheads in this thread. More idiots to set straight.

Rinata...you are dealing with 'word bound' pea brains...Beck DID say:


"Hold these people responsible."

He said, "Hold these people responsible!"


Tell me you're panties aren't so wadded that you've been permanently crippled.

 

[The T]

As soon as you come up with some verifiable examples, you'll be the first.

Bull. You've been given examples coming out of your ears. You are all too dumb to get it. And I notice a whole new group of bagheads in this thread. More idiots to set straight.

Rinata...you are dealing with 'word bound' pea brains...Beck DID say:

"The clock is ticking. . . .
The war is just beginning. . . .
Shoot me in the head if you try to change our government. . . .
You have to be prepared to take rocks to the head. . . .
The other side is attacking. . . .
There is a coup going on. . . .
Grab a torch! . . .
Drive a stake through the heart of the bloodsuckers. . . .
They are taking you to a place to be slaughtered. . . .
They are putting a gun to America's head. . . . "
"Hold these people responsible."

BUT, because Beck didn't say or use the 'word' 'violence' it's all benign and totally harmless...

It is a general popular error to suppose the loudest complainers for the public to be the most anxious for its welfare.
Edmund Burke

And why the HELL don't you write the context in which they were said? The ENTIRE Context. You are doing nothing but hurting your case by short choppy sentences that do not really convey the context in which he was speaking.

Pea Brain indeed. You are their KING by whay you just did here.
You are being 100% disingenuous, and 100% Dishonest as HELL.

 

[Big Fitz]

Of course you'll never hear Beck take responsibility for his words..

You obviously don't know a damn thing about what he says beyond what the administration and media matters tells you. STFU and listen to his radio show for a week. Hear what he says with your own ears.

 

[Big Fitz]

Lots of support for Beck's violence.

And no evidence he encouraged it.

Lots of evidence he has discouraged it.

But as he has ALSO pointed out, the left NEEDS the violence and will manufacture it if they have to all in the advancement of the reich.

 

[Big Fitz]

WOW...I couldn't have scripted the replies any better...vile and filled with aggressiveness in the defense of Glenn Beck's vile and filled with aggressiveness...

I don't call you pea brains for nothing...

The most used phrase in my administration if I were to be President would be "What the hell you mean we're out of missiles?"

Glenn Beck

Damn that's SOOOOOOOOOO SCARY!!!!



I wish you hadn't said anything: Bfgrn's peed himself.

And another case of not being able to tell the difference between a joke and a serious statement for political purposes.