Marine could be kicked out of Corp for using RACIST ACRONYM!!!!

Says the white boy benefiting from 400 years of white male only AA. If there was no AA you wouldnt even be able to hold your job as head fry cook.

There has never been AA for white males. Black failure is due to black inferiority. If blacks are equal then explain why

1. Blacks come in last in all standardized tests. Asians do fine on all the tests so it's not due to cultural bias in the tests..

2. Africa is by far the poorest and most backward continent on the planet. All of black africa is now controlled by blacks and has been for decades so it's not due to racism.

3. No black has ever won a Science Nobel Prize unless you count one in 1979 for the semi-science of economics. They have won many nobels in non-brain fields like Peace and also in Literature so it is not due to racism.

4. Out of 1552 chess grandmasters in the world, only THREE are black.

Of course there was white AA. Thats why the founders of the US made it a law that Blacks were only 3/5ths human. .....

The "3/5ths" law had to do with counting heads for VOTING. The law was passed to WEAKEN the voting power of the slave states.

btw: Ever heard of Elijah Parish Lovejoy (1802 –1837 ?

I dont really care if it was passed to weaken the souths voting power.............

Right, ya don't care. Cause you are currently just a bigot ignoramous

(...... Someone who doesn't know how the world works, and doesn't CARE to know)
Urban Dictionary: ignoramous
.
 
2. Africa was colonized by whites. They continue to monetarily colonize it by taking ownership of all the resources like gold and diamonds. You want Africa to do better? Tell the white boys to really leave it alone and give back the resources.

Whites are in africa because the black governments INVITE them in.. Why don't blacks build their own gold mines and silver mines and oil fields? They can't. Blacks can't do tech Blacks don't become the engineers and businessmen and scientists that create wealth. THINK
 
[
The "3/5ths" law had to do with counting heads for VOTING. The law was passed to WEAKEN the voting power of the slave states.

Yes indeed. Liberals assume it was the south that said blacks are only 3/5ths of a person. But it was the north. The south wanted to count slaves as full humans to increase their representation in congress. Asclepyfag is too dumb to understand that.
 
2. Africa was colonized by whites. They continue to monetarily colonize it by taking ownership of all the resources like gold and diamonds. You want Africa to do better? Tell the white boys to really leave it alone and give back the resources.

Whites are in africa because the black governments INVITE them in.. Why don't blacks build their own gold mines and silver mines and oil fields? They can't. Blacks can't do tech Blacks don't become the engineers and businessmen and scientists that create wealth. THINK
Why should they have to build more gold mines when whites have the ones in their country?
I already challenged you to some tech questions from my engineering background and you ran like a little cur. :laugh:
 
[
The "3/5ths" law had to do with counting heads for VOTING. The law was passed to WEAKEN the voting power of the slave states.

Yes indeed. Liberals assume it was the south that said blacks are only 3/5ths of a person. But it was the north. The south wanted to count slaves as full humans to increase their representation in congress. Asclepyfag is too dumb to understand that.

And that was ONLY for the census for the purpose of voting. Neither the north nor the south ever said they were actually 3/5ths of a person.
 
[
The "3/5ths" law had to do with counting heads for VOTING. The law was passed to WEAKEN the voting power of the slave states.

Yes indeed. Liberals assume it was the south that said blacks are only 3/5ths of a person. But it was the north. The south wanted to count slaves as full humans to increase their representation in congress. Asclepyfag is too dumb to understand that.
Doesnt matter who said it. They were white.
 
[
The "3/5ths" law had to do with counting heads for VOTING. The law was passed to WEAKEN the voting power of the slave states.

Yes indeed. Liberals assume it was the south that said blacks are only 3/5ths of a person. But it was the north. The south wanted to count slaves as full humans to increase their representation in congress. Asclepyfag is too dumb to understand that.

And that was ONLY for the census for the purpose of voting. Neither the north nor the south ever said they were actually 3/5ths of a person.
The direct result of that decision was that people viewed the enslaved as less than human.
 
[
The "3/5ths" law had to do with counting heads for VOTING. The law was passed to WEAKEN the voting power of the slave states.

Yes indeed. Liberals assume it was the south that said blacks are only 3/5ths of a person. But it was the north. The south wanted to count slaves as full humans to increase their representation in congress. Asclepyfag is too dumb to understand that.

And that was ONLY for the census for the purpose of voting. Neither the north nor the south ever said they were actually 3/5ths of a person.
The direct result of that decision was that people viewed the enslaved as less than human.

They already viewed them as less than human. ShitSpeeder trots that figure out every so often and tries to make it look like the gov't claimed they were 3/5ths of a person. When you correct him he stops pushing it, and then uses it in another thread later. He knows it is meaningless.
 
[
The "3/5ths" law had to do with counting heads for VOTING. The law was passed to WEAKEN the voting power of the slave states.

Yes indeed. Liberals assume it was the south that said blacks are only 3/5ths of a person. But it was the north. The south wanted to count slaves as full humans to increase their representation in congress. Asclepyfag is too dumb to understand that.
The north was right, they shouldn't have been counted as part of the population in terms of representation since they couldn't vote. It's the same reason we don't count non-citizens today.
 
[
The "3/5ths" law had to do with counting heads for VOTING. The law was passed to WEAKEN the voting power of the slave states.

Yes indeed. Liberals assume it was the south that said blacks are only 3/5ths of a person. But it was the north. The south wanted to count slaves as full humans to increase their representation in congress. Asclepyfag is too dumb to understand that.

And that was ONLY for the census for the purpose of voting. Neither the north nor the south ever said they were actually 3/5ths of a person.
The direct result of that decision was that people viewed the enslaved as less than human.

They already viewed them as less than human. ShitSpeeder trots that figure out every so often and tries to make it look like the gov't claimed they were 3/5ths of a person. When you correct him he stops pushing it, and then uses it in another thread later. He knows it is meaningless.

Yeah but that pretty much cemented it. It wasnt challenged until the Dred Scott case and that was the reasoning behind the SC ruling.

"
In the opinion of the court, the legislation and histories of the times, and the language used in the Declaration of Independence, show, that neither the class of persons who had been imported as slaves, nor their descendants, whether they had become free or not, were then acknowledged as a part of the people, nor intended to be included in the general words used in that memorable instrument.

It is difficult at this day to realize the state of public opinion in relation to that unfortunate race, which prevailed in the civilized and enlightened portions of the world at the time of the Declaration of Independence, and when the Constitution of the United States was framed and adopted. But the public history of every European nation displays it in a manner too plain to be mistaken.

They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold, and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic, whenever a profit could be made by it. "
 
"Democracy" was an alternative to "king" experiment.

The experiment is over. We're back to having a "king."


The old kings openly claimed they were king directly due to the will of God [and Europeans kings meant God revealed in Bible].

Virtual king Obama would claim he's king due to will of people.


More specifically the will of people who were oppressed till he came along and set them free, while he now righteously punishes the former oppressors.


The dynamics of American politics.


From the founding, for good reason, White Protestants looked down on Roman Catholics and Blacks. Though imperfect, Protestant culture was superior to RC and Black culture.


RCs and Blacks could not help but notice, and could not refute, but naturally resented being looked down on.

Some RCs and Blacks sought to learn from Protestant culture .... but many just wallowed in resentment.


Jews were looked up to in regard to intellect, .... but looked down on as anti-Christ, which they were and are until converted. Jews looked down on and mistrusted due to the fact they put loyalty to their tribe ahead of any loyalty to the USA. Jews were more internationalist than nationalist. Also many Jewish elites were supportive of any kind of moral degradation of Gentiles via entertainment industry, especially if it were profitable.


Muslims seldom even thought of, and deemed deluded when thought of at all.


Sexual perversion looked down on,... kept in the closet.


The mid60s saw the emergence of an alliance of the "looked down on" against Protestant Culture.


In 2008 the Messiah of the "looked down on" became POTUS. Whites naively hoped in vain the glib mulatto would help bring about racial cultural reconciliation.


For 7 years, due to Barack Hussein Obama leadership, we have seen the growing certainty of the "looked down on" that their day of worldly triumph over the hated Protestant culture people is at hand. And it is. But it will be an hollow victory.


After they have served their purpose [as a battering ram against Protestantism and “sovereign” Constitutional America], the elites who have been using the "looked down on" will treat the "looked down on" far more harshly than the Protestants ever dreamed of doing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top